;
> > backup.xxx.fr kernel log messages:
> >> dc0: TX underrun -- increasing TX threshold
> Any idea ?
man 4 dc
dc%d: TX underrun -- increasing TX threshold The device generated a
transmit underrun error while attempting to DMA and transmit a packet.
This happen
I have this message that has showed up in the "security run output"
I don't really know what It means ?
> backup.xxx.fr kernel log messages:
>> dc0: TX underrun -- increasing TX threshold
Any idea ?
___
[EMAIL PROT
Jason Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What does this mean?
>
> dc0: TX underrun -- increasing TX threshold
Is the answer in the dc(4) manual insufficient?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
What does this mean?
dc0: TX underrun -- increasing TX threshold
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
- Original Message -
From: "default013" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 13:42:45 -0600
To: "FreeBSD-Questions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: TX underrun
> I recently moved my server from a 384 SDSL line to a colocation facility.
> Sin
Hello,
I recently moved my server from a 384 SDSL line to a colocation facility.
Since the move, I've been receiving these messages about once a week (just
one message, about once a week):
dc0: TX underrun -- resetting
This is a guess but I believe this is when I am SSHing into the s
hi
i get the following error
l0: transmissions error: 90
xl0: tx underrun, increasing tx start threshold to 120 bytes
when trying to ftp a large tar.gz file to a dell poweredge network storage appli
ance.
the commands i'm using to upload this large tar.gz file are:
ftp
Doug Reynolds wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003 03:17:01 +0100 (CET), Marc Schneiders wrote:
[ ... ]
xl1: tx underrun, increasing tx start threshold to 180 bytes
xl1: transmission error: 90
xl1: tx underrun, increasing tx start threshold to 240 bytes
does that mean it is increasing or decreasing
t;
> >> does anyone know of a way to automatically increase the buffers to say
> >> like 256 bytes?
> >
> >Mine automatically DEcreases at an underrun.
> >
> >It's a 3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL.
>
> > xl1: tx underrun, increasing tx start t
gt; like 256 bytes?
>
>Mine automatically DEcreases at an underrun.
>
>It's a 3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL.
> xl1: tx underrun, increasing tx start threshold to 180 bytes
> xl1: transmission error: 90
> xl1: tx underrun, increasing tx start threshold to 240 bytes
doe
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, at 22:27 [=GMT-0500], Doug Reynolds wrote:
> On 17 Jan 2003 00:08:11 +, Stacey Roberts wrote:
> does anyone know of a way to automatically increase the buffers to say
> like 256 bytes?
Mine automatically DEcreases at an underrun.
It's a 3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL.
On 17 Jan 2003 00:08:11 +, Stacey Roberts wrote:
>> I only had one message like this, so I think it would be best to wait and
>> see if i get message mor often. I think my cables are OK.
>
>Is this a Linksys nic? I only ask because the only occasion that *I*
>have heard of this becoming a prob
Marco Beishuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, the wise Marc Schneiders spoke, and said:
>
> > On 16 Jan 2003, at 22:35 [=GMT-], Stacey Roberts wrote:
> >
> > > Nothing to worry about, but either reducing system load .., or buying a
> > > more efficient nic would see thes
Hi Marco,
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 23:51, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, the wise Marc Schneiders spoke, and said:
>
> > On 16 Jan 2003, at 22:35 [=GMT-], Stacey Roberts wrote:
> >
> > > Nothing to worry about, but either reducing system load .., or buying a
> > > more efficient
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, the wise Marc Schneiders spoke, and said:
> On 16 Jan 2003, at 22:35 [=GMT-], Stacey Roberts wrote:
>
> > Nothing to worry about, but either reducing system load .., or buying a
> > more efficient nic would see these messages off.
>
> Could it also be the cable? I once had
On 16 Jan 2003, at 22:35 [=GMT-], Stacey Roberts wrote:
> Nothing to worry about, but either reducing system load .., or buying a
> more efficient nic would see these messages off.
Could it also be the cable? I once had these messages on a colocated
machine, occasionally, and they went away w
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, the wise Stacey Roberts spoke, and said:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 22:22, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Recently, I noticed a kernel message on one of my machines:
> >
> > dc0: TX underrun -- increasing TX threshold
>
At 11:22 PM 1.16.2003 +0100, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>Recently, I noticed a kernel message on one of my machines:
>
>dc0: TX underrun -- increasing TX threshold
>
>It doesn't seem to be very important. I'm just curious what it means. Does
>anyone kn
Hi,
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 22:22, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently, I noticed a kernel message on one of my machines:
>
> dc0: TX underrun -- increasing TX threshold
>
> It doesn't seem to be very important. I'm just curious what it means. Does
> any
Hi,
Recently, I noticed a kernel message on one of my machines:
dc0: TX underrun -- increasing TX threshold
It doesn't seem to be very important. I'm just curious what it means. Does
anyone know what it means?
Thanks,
Marco
--
"Might as well be frank, monsieur. It would ta
- Original Message -
From: "bowen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 17:54:48 -0700
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dc0: TX underrun
> question 1:) I keep getting this message??
>
> dc0: TX underrun -- increasing TX threshold
>
>
question 1:) I keep getting this message??
dc0: TX underrun -- increasing TX threshold
Is this normal or do I need to buy a better nic? It's currently a Linksys
10/100 pci nic ?
question 2:) Also any newer links to using freebsd as a router/firewall
using 4.7-RELEASE ?
question 3:) is tri
24 matches
Mail list logo
