On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 10:00:16PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>>> well last night i tested it with SCHED_4BSD instead of sched_ule, reduced
>>> quantum to 2 from 10 and for now - no voice chopping under high
>>> load. but i will test it more.
>>
>> What version of FreeBSD are you using f
well last night i tested it with SCHED_4BSD instead of sched_ule, reduced
quantum to 2 from 10 and for now - no voice chopping under high
load. but i will test it more.
What version of FreeBSD are you using for this? Yes, it matters.
got RELENG_7 yesterday by cvs, now SCHED_ULE works
quantum to 2 from 10 and for now - no voice chopping under high
load. but i will test it more.
What version of FreeBSD are you using for this? Yes, it matters.
7.0
please give me few days to make more precise reports from my users and me
being on place today (not just testing this t
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 11:18:32AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>> Well, basically you are the only one who can answer that. And that's not
>> a paradox or an attempt at humor. You should investigate. Maybe
>> interrupts aren't processed fast enough (hardware sharing an
>> interrupt?), or memory o
Well, basically you are the only one who can answer that. And that's not
a paradox or an attempt at humor. You should investigate. Maybe
interrupts aren't processed fast enough (hardware sharing an
interrupt?), or memory or kernel resources are low.
well last night i tested it with SCHED_4BSD in
for example when lots of spam comes to server and lots of resource hungry
spamassassin processes are spawned our calls starts to be crappy.
And that's why I always have isolated my telephony servers from
normal-ISP tasks: They provide real-time tasks and should be running
in memory only.
i know
> for example when lots of spam comes to server and lots of resource hungry
> spamassassin processes are spawned our calls starts to be crappy.
And that's why I always have isolated my telephony servers from
normal-ISP tasks: They provide real-time tasks and should be running
in memory only.
Edwi
--- On Tue, 10/7/08, Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Wojciech
> is it possible on FreeBSD
>
Its soft RT. Try to use the latest ULE scheduler.
> i run asterisk with realtime priority. it works perfectly
> no matter how
> much CPU is loaded by other non-telephony tasks.
>
> bu
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 10:21:01PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> is it possible on FreeBSD
No, I think.
> i run asterisk with realtime priority. it works perfectly no matter how
> much CPU is loaded by other non-telephony tasks.
>
> but with lots of VM pressure it starts to so... like like t
is it possible on FreeBSD
i run asterisk with realtime priority. it works perfectly no matter how
much CPU is loaded by other non-telephony tasks.
but with lots of VM pressure it starts to so... like like tha..that...
what causes it to behave like that and how to fix it.
for example when lot
10 matches
Mail list logo
