Re: Samba between Mac and BSD

2003-07-11 Thread Chuck Swiger
Jim Xochellis wrote: [ ... ] For some definitions of "transparent". If the client uses the AppleDouble format, that wraps the resource fork and works fine against a normal NFS server. Some Mac NFS implementations do that, some don't. Very interesting, thanks! I would like to try this solution.

Re: Samba between Mac and BSD

2003-07-11 Thread Jim Xochellis
Hi Chuck, hi list, On Thursday, July 10, 2003, at 07:59 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote: Jim Xochellis wrote: Hi Chuck, hi list, Hi, Jim-- Chuck Swiger wrote: NFS is an entirely reasonable choice for filesharing against OS X; netatalk would be a comparitively better choice for MacOS 9 and previous ver

Re: Samba between Mac and BSD

2003-07-10 Thread Chuck Swiger
Jim Xochellis wrote: Hi Chuck, hi list, Hi, Jim-- Chuck Swiger wrote: NFS is an entirely reasonable choice for filesharing against OS X; netatalk would be a comparitively better choice for MacOS 9 and previous versions. People who have laptops or other network roaming environments will probably

Re: Samba between Mac and BSD

2003-07-10 Thread Jim Xochellis
Hi Chuck, hi list, Chuck Swiger wrote: Joel Rees wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 09:11:11PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ... ] >> I would think that NFS would be a better choice between two Unix >> systems than Samba. > > To which I might add that netatalk would seem to me to be a better >

Re: Samba between Mac and BSD

2003-07-10 Thread Chuck Swiger
Joel Rees wrote: On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 09:11:11PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ... ] I would think that NFS would be a better choice between two Unix systems than Samba. To which I might add that netatalk would seem to me to be a better option than Samba if the only client is a Mac. But th

Re: Samba between Mac and BSD

2003-07-09 Thread Joel Rees
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 09:11:11PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > FreeBSD Question Answerer- > > First of all thank you for your help and time. I have a question about > >running a Samba server where the server is a FreeBSD machine and the client > >is a Macintosh ibook running max

Re: Samba between Mac and BSD

2003-07-09 Thread Loz
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-09 05:08]: > First of all thank you for your help and time. I have a question about > running a Samba server where the server is a FreeBSD machine and the client > is a Macintosh ibook running max os X. I can't help much except to say that t

Re: Samba between Mac and BSD

2003-07-08 Thread Chuck Swiger
Bill Campbell wrote: On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 09:11:11PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FreeBSD Question Answerer- First of all thank you for your help and time. I have a question about running a Samba server where the server is a FreeBSD machine and the client is a Macintosh ibook

Re: Samba between Mac and BSD

2003-07-08 Thread Bill Campbell
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 09:11:11PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > FreeBSD Question Answerer- > First of all thank you for your help and time. I have a question about >running a Samba server where the server is a FreeBSD machine and the client >is a Macintosh ibook running max os X.

Samba between Mac and BSD

2003-07-08 Thread esayer1
FreeBSD Question Answerer- First of all thank you for your help and time. I have a question about running a Samba server where the server is a FreeBSD machine and the client is a Macintosh ibook running max os X. The client would have a wireless PC card connection that runs through