Re: Samba 3.2 & FreeBSD

2009-02-10 Thread Jerry
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:04:52 +0300 Proskurin Kirill wrote: >Odhiambo Washington wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Proskurin Kirill >>> >>> Just wondering - why samba 3.2+ is not in a ports? >> net/samba3-devel ?? > >Oh. But why it is "devel"? >Samba 3.3 is officially stable. Have you t

Re: Samba 3.2 & FreeBSD

2009-02-10 Thread Michael Powell
Proskurin Kirill wrote: > Odhiambo Washington wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Proskurin Kirill >>> >>> Just wondering - why samba 3.2+ is not in a ports? >> net/samba3-devel ?? > > Oh. But why it is "devel"? > Samba 3.3 is officially stable. > Look in the subdirectory called "files"

Re: Samba 3.2 & FreeBSD

2009-02-10 Thread Proskurin Kirill
Odhiambo Washington wrote: On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Proskurin Kirill Just wondering - why samba 3.2+ is not in a ports? net/samba3-devel ?? Oh. But why it is "devel"? Samba 3.3 is officially stable. -- Best regards, Proskurin Kirill ___ f

Re: Samba 3.2 & FreeBSD

2009-02-10 Thread Odhiambo Washington
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Proskurin Kirill wrote: > Hello all. > > Just wondering - why samba 3.2+ is not in a ports? net/samba3-devel ?? -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ "The only time a woman

Samba 3.2 & FreeBSD

2009-02-10 Thread Proskurin Kirill
Hello all. Just wondering - why samba 3.2+ is not in a ports? -- Best regards, Proskurin Kirill ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questio