I've got a gateway machine running routed. If I use ifconfig to
temporarily add a /32 alias to an interface to give it an alternate
identity on that interface's network, and then delete the alias, it
reappears in the routing table shortly after. Use "route delete" to
clear
/i386/include/_types.h so that
__time_t is defined as __int64_t, I received a warning when compiling
sbin/routed/if.c that complained about passing a time_t for %ld. The following
patch illustrates the change I made to fix this:
--- orig/if.c 2011-03-05 14:25:47.0 -0800
+++ new
Hi all,
I stumbled on this while trying to track down an mbuf leak on a new server.
It seems that routed corrupts the arp table on FreeBSD 6.2 when
there are more than one ip alias on an interface. The behaviour differs
depending on whether routed is enable in rc.d or manually started after
boot
On Saturday 03 February 2007 22:08, Thiago Esteves de Oliveira wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using "FreeBSD 6.2 Stable" with routed to connect networks(gateway)
>
>
>THE INTERNET
> |
> |
>
> The top interface address is wrong. It cant be eee.eee.eee.11 with /26
> mask.
> The lowest address with this mask is 193.
Ops... I'm wrong here ofcourse... The address is correct ;]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.
makes little sense...
Sorry if im wrong. Please explain more!
Cheers,
greg
> Hi,
>
> I'm using "FreeBSD 6.2 Stable" with routed to connect
> networks(gateway)
>
>
>THE INTERNET
> |
> |
> -
Hi,
I'm using "FreeBSD 6.2 Stable" with routed to connect networks(gateway)
THE INTERNET
|
|
| eee.eee.eee.0/26 |
|
|
eee.eee.eee.11/26
ROUTER
dharam paul wrote:
Hi,
I want to to implement mails sent from my network from
outlook express be routed through sendmail to their
destined address.
Come pointers please!
Thanks in advance.
Well, how are they being routed at the present time? Sendmail is an
SMTP server (MTA-Mail Transport
Hi,
I want to to implement mails sent from my network from
outlook express be routed through sendmail to their
destined address.
Come pointers please!
Thanks in advance.
__
Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn
x27;t see it go through.
I'm trying to set up a routed vpn between two freebsd 5.4 machines.
Currently they're on the same physical subnet, 192.168.0.x to make testing
easier and for vpn they're using 10.8.0.x. My first problem, although both
server and client start, i can onl
Hello,
My apologies if this is a repost i didn't see it go through.
I'm trying to set up a routed vpn between two freebsd 5.4 machines.
Currently they're on the same physical subnet, 192.168.0.x to make testing
easier and for vpn they're using 10.8.0.x. My first pr
Jim Pazarena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can the routed daemon co-exist with a CISCO router which, by default,
> also responds to routing requests?
>
> The reason I ask, is that I accidentally installed routed, and it
> was running, and my whole network came to a grindi
Can the routed daemon co-exist with a CISCO router which, by default,
also responds to routing requests?
The reason I ask, is that I accidentally installed routed, and it
was running, and my whole network came to a grinding halt, until
I de-activated routed. I had not set up *any* configuration
Hello everyone,
I'm trying to get past a sticky routing situation by running routed on
all of my machines in my server cluster. I've been instructed by
several sources of authority that the best solution for a multi-homed
ip address scenario is bind the ip addresses to the loopback
Try to put two lines in /etc/gateways
if=fxp2 passive
if=fxp3 passive
Cheers Tom
> Is it possible to have routed(8) ignore certain ethernet interfaces.
>
> For example, on a device with fxp[0-3], I only need routed to
> interact with fxp[0-1], and to ignore the existence of fxp[2
Is it possible to have routed(8) ignore certain ethernet interfaces.
For example, on a device with fxp[0-3], I only need routed to
interact with fxp[0-1], and to ignore the existence of fxp[2-3].
TIA,
rip
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http
Hi
When i boot my firewall i get a permission denied from routed when it tries to sendto
the second nic.
What could be causing this?
Med vänliga hälsningar
Stefan Midjich, Swebase AB
Tel: 042-20 15 00
Fax: 042-20 15 03
E-post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Webb: http://swebase.com
when i run netstat -r, i
> dont see that. When i want to get again the routing
> table, i run routed (probably this is what i need for
> regetting the routing table) and when i try a web page
> on the web browser, it shows me the same eror as in
> the case of the deleted routing table.
great, however it works for me know so I'm pleased again! ;)
On Sat, 2003-06-28 at 00:04, freeBSD wrote:
> I have run into a strange problem:
>
> Suddenly has my nic no routingtables so name lookups etc doesn't work.
>
> The only solution is to SU and kill
I have run into a strange problem:
Suddenly has my nic no routingtables so name lookups etc doesn't work.
The only solution is to SU and kill routed and then start it again.
Everything will then work for an hour or so and then I'm back on step
one again.
I have laborated with cvs
Hello,
I would like to what are the advantiges and disadvantiges of using the
routed daemon.
Should I small web and mail server run this daemon?
Thanks..
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
metric 3 passive
net subnet-pazin/24 gateway 192.168.1.1 metric 3 passive
net subnet-labin/24 gateway 192.168.1.1 metric 3 passive
box# routed
box# routed: duplicate /etc/gateways entry "net subnet-rovinj/24 gateway pix met
Hi,
how can I prevent automatic updating of routing tables where one of the
flags has "D" (Dynamic). I tried to put
routed: ALL: deny in /etc/hosts.allow, but somehow I still got entries in
routing table.
Thank you!
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsu
gateway 172.16.4.11 <--- This should not be here
(dynamic flag)
I don't have routed daemon running. Who is updating my routing table?
Thanks!
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
24 matches
Mail list logo
