On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Chris Hill wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Chris Hill wrote:
>
> I'm looking to set up some sort of revision control system at work.
>>
>
> Thank you to everyone who replied. Based on what I've found out, I think I
> will be setting up git on a test server so I can
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Chris Hill wrote:
I'm looking to set up some sort of revision control system at work.
Thank you to everyone who replied. Based on what I've found out, I think I
will be setting up git on a test server so I can get familiar with it.
Thanks again, and a happy $HOLIDAY to
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 09:23:22AM +1030, William Brown wrote:
> On 22/12/2011, at 20:06, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> >
> > svn vs git vs mercurial
> >
> > svn has the model of a central repository that everything has to
> > communicate with. This can be attractive in a commercial environment as
> >
Absolutely go distributed vcs over centralized. Keeping code always under
version control, even when local in your sandbox, is extremely powerful. And
since a distributed vcs can be used as a centralized vcs, there's really no
technical reason to use a centralized vcs.
- Original Message --
On 22/12/2011 22:53, William Brown wrote:
Again, git wins here. It has good support on windows, as well as with
graphical tools on windows.
Is there a git equivalent of TortoiseSVN then? That's the best VC
integration I've seen on any platform...
One small but cosmetic thing with git vs svn: y
On 22/12/2011, at 20:06, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 22/12/2011 04:53, Rob Byrnes wrote:
Yeah I would second what Mr Rock says. Set up a single repo where
>> folders can be used for projects. Since svn lets you checkout sub
>> folders of a repo, each developer can check out the fold
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 08:24:01PM -0700, ss griffon wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Da Rock
> wrote:
> > On 12/22/11 11:37, Chris Hill wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello list,
> >>
> >> I apologize for this posting being not-much-on-topic, but my other
> >> resources have come to naught and I thi
On 22/12/2011 04:53, Rob Byrnes wrote:
>>> Yeah I would second what Mr Rock says. Set up a single repo where
>>> >> folders can be used for projects. Since svn lets you checkout sub
>>> >> folders of a repo, each developer can check out the folder that
>>> >> corresponds to their project. Also,
On 22 December 2011 15:07, Outback Dingo wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:24 PM, ss griffon wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Da Rock
>> wrote:
>>> On 12/22/11 11:37, Chris Hill wrote:
Hello list,
I apologize for this posting being not-much-on-topic, but my other
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:24 PM, ss griffon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Da Rock
> wrote:
>> On 12/22/11 11:37, Chris Hill wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello list,
>>>
>>> I apologize for this posting being not-much-on-topic, but my other
>>> resources have come to naught and I think you folks ma
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Da Rock
wrote:
> On 12/22/11 11:37, Chris Hill wrote:
>>
>> Hello list,
>>
>> I apologize for this posting being not-much-on-topic, but my other
>> resources have come to naught and I think you folks may have some experience
>> in this area.
>>
>> I'm looking to se
On 12/22/11 11:37, Chris Hill wrote:
Hello list,
I apologize for this posting being not-much-on-topic, but my other
resources have come to naught and I think you folks may have some
experience in this area.
I'm looking to set up some sort of revision control system at work.
Simple enough, e
Hello list,
I apologize for this posting being not-much-on-topic, but my other
resources have come to naught and I think you folks may have some
experience in this area.
I'm looking to set up some sort of revision control system at work. Simple
enough, except that our situation is approximat
13 matches
Mail list logo
