On Wed, Aug 21, 2013, at 1:54, Antonio Kless wrote:
> Is there any way to be noticed, when security updates or new releases are
> available?
>
> https://twitter.com/freebsd nearly would be a solution, if it did not
> repostquestions from its
> subscribers and other information t
e:
>> Is there any way to be noticed, when security updates or new releases are
>> available?
>>
>> https://twitter.com/freebsd nearly would be a solution, if it did not
>> repostquestions from its
>> subscriber
http://www.freebsd.org/security/rss.xml
?
Peter
On 21/08/2013 09:54, Antonio Kless wrote:
> Is there any way to be noticed, when security updates or new releases are
> available?
>
> https://twitter.com/freebsd nearly would be a solution, if it did not
> repostquestions from it
On 21/08/2013 08:10, dgmm wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 August 2013 07:54:06 Antonio Kless wrote:
>> Is there any way to be noticed, when security updates or new releases are
>> available?
>>
>> https://twitter.com/freebsd nearly would be a solution, if it did not
On Wednesday 21 August 2013 07:54:06 Antonio Kless wrote:
> Is there any way to be noticed, when security updates or new releases are
> available?
>
> https://twitter.com/freebsd nearly would be a solution, if it did not
> repostquestions from its
> subscribers and other infor
Is there any way to be noticed, when security updates or new releases are
available?
https://twitter.com/freebsd nearly would be a solution, if it did not
repostquestions from its
subscribers and other information that is not related to updates.
--
Best regards,
Antonio
On 03/07/13 19:53, Kris Sridhar wrote:
Gentlemen,
The library (/lib/libz.so.6) in FreeBSD 9.1R does seem to have Zlib 1.2.4 based
on the complaints from the following at least:
libarchive.so.*
libssh.so.*
grep
gzip
I've provided objdump -p output from my machine:
-
Gentlemen,
The library (/lib/libz.so.6) in FreeBSD 9.1R does seem to have Zlib 1.2.4 based
on the complaints from the following at least:
libarchive.so.*
libssh.so.*
grep
gzip
I've provided objdump -p output from my machine:
fBSD9
On 2013-03-06 08:06, Arthur Chance wrote:
> On 03/05/13 16:12, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> >On 2013-03-04 07:28, KrisUniverse wrote:
> >>The Zlib baked into FreeBSD is Zlib 1.2.4 even on 9.1R.
> >>
> >>However, Zlib has gone to 1.2.7 sometime ago after stepping through
> >>1.2.5, 1.2.6 and 1.2.7 w
On 03/05/13 16:12, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2013-03-04 07:28, KrisUniverse wrote:
The Zlib baked into FreeBSD is Zlib 1.2.4 even on 9.1R.
However, Zlib has gone to 1.2.7 sometime ago after stepping through
1.2.5, 1.2.6 and 1.2.7 with bug fixes.
Is there any reason for not using Zlib 1.2.7?
On 2013-03-04 07:28, KrisUniverse wrote:
> The Zlib baked into FreeBSD is Zlib 1.2.4 even on 9.1R.
>
> However, Zlib has gone to 1.2.7 sometime ago after stepping through
> 1.2.5, 1.2.6 and 1.2.7 with bug fixes.
>
> Is there any reason for not using Zlib 1.2.7?
I don't have a 9.1-RELEASE system
The Zlib baked into FreeBSD is Zlib 1.2.4 even on 9.1R.
However, Zlib has gone to 1.2.7 sometime ago after stepping through 1.2.5,
1.2.6 and 1.2.7 with bug fixes.
Is there any reason for not using Zlib 1.2.7?
Thanks.
Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebs
d as "legacy" in the home and here:
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/.
I guess it should go away there too.
bye
av.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscr
On Mar 2, 2013, at 4:59 PM, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote:
> On 2 Mar 2013 09:47, "Andrea Venturoli" wrote:
>> Just a quick question on EOL dates.
>>
>> According to http://www.freebsd.org/security/security.html#sup, 7.4R
> support should have ended two days ago. Did it?
>> Is Feb 28 2013 date con
On 2 Mar 2013 09:47, "Andrea Venturoli" wrote:
> Just a quick question on EOL dates.
>
> According to http://www.freebsd.org/security/security.html#sup, 7.4R
support should have ended two days ago. Did it?
> Is Feb 28 2013 date confirmed?
>
> Next, 9.0 should reach EOL at the end of this month.
>
Hello.
Just a quick question on EOL dates.
According to http://www.freebsd.org/security/security.html#sup, 7.4R
support should have ended two days ago. Did it?
Is Feb 28 2013 date confirmed?
Next, 9.0 should reach EOL at the end of this month.
Is this confirmed too?
bye & Thanks
av.
w stopped in mid-2011.
>
> From time to time it comes in very handy for testing purposes, to have
> snapshot releases available.
>
The RE team has been busy with actual releases since about that date:
first 9.0 and at the moment 8.3. Even so, this does seem to have fallen
by the waysid
purposes, to have snapshot
releases available.
Kai.
BTW: If replying, please CC me, as I am not on this
list.___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
m: Vong Bui
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 3:00 PM
Subject: Legacy releases of freeBSD
Hello,
I am trying to learn Unix by using freeBSD and wanted to obtain an "older"
version of freeBSD, such as version 3.5, to accompany a book about freeBSD
publi
d, if they are available for download.
Thank you
ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/old-releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/
Regards,
Michael
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-qu
Hello,
I am trying to learn Unix by using freeBSD and wanted to obtain an
"older" version of freeBSD, such as version 3.5, to accompany a book
about freeBSD published around 1999. Can you point me to where the iso
images can be found, if they are available for download.
Thank you
--
Vong Bui
ad/jail_build.txt
or
http://druidbsd.sf.net/download/jail_build.gz
or
http://druidbsd.sf.net/
For those not familiar, my jail_build(8) script can be used to unpack a binary
release (found at ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases or
ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/ol
Dear Manolis,
Sorry to ask but are there any releases for 8.2 in the works?
http://freebsd-custom.wikidot.com/
I have checked here:
http://freebsd-custom.wikidot.com/downloads-page
but it stil points to 8.1 release. I have an 8.1 version running
beautifully thanks to you and all the members
ote:
> HI, Freebsd-questions.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/ru/releases/
> on this page is wrong information about releases.
>
> Old release is 6.0 and last is 8.1 on march 2006!! year.
Please file a change request:
man send-pr
send-pr
Which both:
- lodges
HI, Freebsd-questions.
http://www.freebsd.org/ru/releases/
on this page is wrong information about releases.
Old release is 6.0 and last is 8.1 on march 2006!! year.
--
С уважением,
Коньков mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:02:01 +0200, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> Thank you. I will follow RELEASE than. Also a thanks to Svein. ;-) Is
> RELEASE automaticaly set in a fresh FreeBSD install or do I need to
> change anything?
The freebsd-update program will track RELEASE-p because this is
what it can
On 8/12/2010 2:02 PM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
On 12-8-2010 22:53, Polytropon wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 22:46:18 +0200, Dick Hoogendijk
wrote:
I'm running 8.1-RELEASE now, but what about security issues found?
Which brach do I follow?
In this case, use "freebsd-update" to track -RELEASE; you
On 12-8-2010 22:53, Polytropon wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 22:46:18 +0200, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
I'm running 8.1-RELEASE now, but what about security issues found?
Which brach do I follow?
In this case, use "freebsd-update" to track -RELEASE; you will
get the security patches by binary updati
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 22:46:18 +0200, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> My years of OpenSolaris made me forget the use of releases and branches.
> I'm not into too much compiling anymore. I want a stable, but also safe
> server.
> I'm running 8.1-RELEASE now, but what about securit
On 12.08.2010 22:46, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> My years of OpenSolaris made me forget the use of releases and branches.
> I'm not into too much compiling anymore. I want a stable, but also safe
> server.
> I'm running 8.1-RELEASE now, but what about security issues found?
&
My years of OpenSolaris made me forget the use of releases and branches.
I'm not into too much compiling anymore. I want a stable, but also safe
server.
I'm running 8.1-RELEASE now, but what about security issues found?
What do I need to run if I want the lates and needed security
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 10:27:19AM +, Giorgos Tsiapaliokas wrote:
> hello,
>
> i was using gentoo linux and i have install FBSD 8.0 in my second machine..
>
> i have read the handbooks but i cannot understand which version of FBSD i
> have.
> i mean i know that i have 8.0 but i have the stab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/06/2010 12:30:53, Reko Turja wrote:
> From: "Matthew Seaman"
>> STABLE is a development branch: it's called 'STABLE' because it is
>> expected to run stably. STABLE generally receives continual fixes and
>> updates, but these will previously h
--
From: "Matthew Seaman"
Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2010 2:03 PM
To:
Subject: Re: freebsd releases?!?!?!(confused)
STABLE is a development branch: it's called 'STABLE' because it is
expected to run stably. STABLE generally
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/06/2010 11:27:19, Giorgos Tsiapaliokas wrote:
> hello,
>
> i was using gentoo linux and i have install FBSD 8.0 in my second machine..
>
> i have read the handbooks but i cannot understand which version of FBSD i
> have.
> i mean i know that i
On 06/06/2010 1:27 μ.μ., Giorgos Tsiapaliokas wrote:
> hello,
>
> i was using gentoo linux and i have install FBSD 8.0 in my second machine..
>
> i have read the handbooks but i cannot understand which version of FBSD i
> have.
> i mean i know that i have 8.0 but i have the stable or the unstable
>
hello,
i was using gentoo linux and i have install FBSD 8.0 in my second machine..
i have read the handbooks but i cannot understand which version of FBSD i
have.
i mean i know that i have 8.0 but i have the stable or the unstable
version???
and what is going on with the mirrors?
>
> Since I am new to FreeBSD, what am I obviously missing? Is there a place that
> states the releases? Is there an 8.1 or 8.2 out now that has even a new
> version of ZFS?
>
Have a look at the DESCRIPTION section of the freebsd-update(8) man page,
which explains why you cannot u
the releases? Is there an 8.1 or 8.2 out now that has even a new version
of ZFS?
Best,
-Jason
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ques
rises. It will also contain announcements for
new releases.
Thanks for your support!
Manolis Kiagias
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAko9DZsACgkQZ/MxGm4PtJSd6wCfYPtQ1MLH1ttDXF5C3lR
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Jason Nordwick wrote:
> I'm a previous FreeBSD user that used to track current and returning after a
> few years. If my memory is correct, the definition of -stable, -release, and
> -current seems to have changed? (but my memory sucks so excuse me if I'm
> wrong).
I'm a previous FreeBSD user that used to track current and returning
after a few years. If my memory is correct, the definition of -stable,
-release, and -current seems to have changed? (but my memory sucks so
excuse me if I'm wrong).
Can you no longer track -release, but instead -stable is
) have grown so much that it make
me feel guilty to waste the FreeBSD Project's donated resources! :[
Thus, I looked for any documentation about setup a FreeBSD builder machine
which will track sources and build binaries for all the hardware platform and
OS releases I need to support in my ne
> > B. Add functionality to the installer to list the available
> > releases if it can't find the release it's looking for.
...
> So Kevin, your rant is completely based on BETAs, Snapshots,
> and probably RC's if we had any available.
>
> All thr
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Tim Judd wrote:
So Kevin, your rant is completely based on BETAs, Snapshots, and probably
RC's if we had any available.
All three of those ARE NOT RELEASES.
Those are come-n-go folders/directories on the ftp servers.
For the most part, fair enough. I do realize t
all from the
> 7.0-STABLE-200807 ISO I have handy. I get to the same point and it
> complains that it can't find release 7.0-STABLE-200807 on the FTP server.
> Fortunately after a few tries I was able to do a better job of jogging my
> poor memory and made the installer happy
better job
of jogging my poor memory and made the installer happy using 7.0-RELEASE
as the release name. Would someone please:
A. Keep the releases available on the FTP servers for a reasonable amount
of time.
and/or
B. Add functionality to the installer to list the available releases
Or use bittorrent if you're way out in the cut
~BAS
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Bryan Bonifacio wrote:
Why don't you just download the CD image and burn that
onto a CD?
Go to
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/6.1/
--- Stojance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
Jason C. Wells writes:
> Ports astonish me more often than FreeBSD to be sure. If one
> uses a port that was built on a 6.0 system, can one trust that no
> bit rot will occur by the time 6.9 rolls around.
If you mean "Is it guaranteed a binary built under x.0 will
run, even with rema
Jason C. Wells wrote:
Ports astonish me more often than FreeBSD to be sure. If one uses a
port that was built on a 6.0 system, can one trust that no bit rot will
occur by the time 6.9 rolls around. Will all of FreeBSDs interfaces and
features remain backward compatible? While the developer
Erik Norgaard wrote:
Jason C. Wells wrote:
Where is the policy regarding compatibility between releases documented?
I recall reading once upon a time that FreeBSD won't break
compatibility for the duration of a major point release. If a third
party wrote software for 6.0 it wou
Jason C. Wells wrote:
Where is the policy regarding compatibility between releases documented?
I recall reading once upon a time that FreeBSD won't break compatibility
for the duration of a major point release. If a third party wrote
software for 6.0 it would be perfectly compatible wit
Where is the policy regarding compatibility between releases documented?
I recall reading once upon a time that FreeBSD won't break compatibility
for the duration of a major point release. If a third party wrote
software for 6.0 it would be perfectly compatible with 6.1, 6.2 and on.
Why don't you just download the CD image and burn that
onto a CD?
Go to
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/6.1/
--- Stojance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear FreeBSD
> Can I make my own bootable CD from FreeBSD, actually
> from the
Dear FreeBSD
Can I make my own bootable CD from FreeBSD, actually from the ftp
server: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/6.1-RELEASE ?
I really need it. I can't pay for your CD ROM so any help would be very
much appreciated.
I'll download everything and put it on a CD a
Pavel Duda wrote:
Justin T. Wert wrote:
To Whom It May Concern:
Are there any plans to release a DVD version of all 3 of your
media CDs combined? I tried searching the web on how to combine the
media
into one DVD, but have failed to find a site that has a working
method. My
pe
Justin T. Wert wrote:
To Whom It May Concern:
Are there any plans to release a DVD version of all 3 of your
media CDs combined? I tried searching the web on how to combine the media
into one DVD, but have failed to find a site that has a working method. My
personal attempts have t
To Whom It May Concern:
Are there any plans to release a DVD version of all 3 of your
media CDs combined? I tried searching the web on how to combine the media
into one DVD, but have failed to find a site that has a working method. My
personal attempts have the same issue, where it
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:39:41AM +0100, martinko wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 01:00:03AM +0100, martinko wrote:
> >
> >
> >>but where is the schedule published ??
> >>i fail to locate it on the web site. all i can find a
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 01:00:03AM +0100, martinko wrote:
but where is the schedule published ??
i fail to locate it on the web site. all i can find are current and old
releases and an incomplete schedule for "upcoming" 6.0 (about which i
just "compl
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 01:00:03AM +0100, martinko wrote:
> but where is the schedule published ??
> i fail to locate it on the web site. all i can find are current and old
> releases and an incomplete schedule for "upcoming" 6.0 (about which i
> just "complained&q
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 12:07:09AM +0100, martinko wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:01:32AM +0300, Casper wrote:
Hi,
I`m trying to make little schedule for upgrading and wanted to know
when approximate will be new FreeBSD releases...
How I
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 12:07:09AM +0100, martinko wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:01:32AM +0300, Casper wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I`m trying to make little schedule for upgrading and wanted to know
> >>when ap
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:01:32AM +0300, Casper wrote:
Hi,
I`m trying to make little schedule for upgrading and wanted to know
when approximate will be new FreeBSD releases...
How I understand in few weeks must be FreeBSD 5.5 release, but I can`t
find schedule for
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:01:32AM +0300, Casper wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I`m trying to make little schedule for upgrading and wanted to know
> when approximate will be new FreeBSD releases...
> How I understand in few weeks must be FreeBSD 5.5 release, but I can`t
> find
Hi,
I`m trying to make little schedule for upgrading and wanted to know
when approximate will be new FreeBSD releases...
How I understand in few weeks must be FreeBSD 5.5 release, but I can`t
find schedule for upcoming 5.5 version... Or it is delayed?
Or in few weeks will be maybe
: Re: Differences between FreeBSD 5.4 and 6.0 releases
Justin Franks wrote:
I've been using FreeBSD since the 3.x trains and run 5.4 now.
Can someone please bullet point the main features of 6.0, specifically the
features that 6.0 will have that 5.4 does not?
Thanks.
Hello Justin,
the re
ftp://ftp2.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/6.0-BETA1/RELNOTES.HTM
Regards Björn
--
Björn König ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
student at the Technische Universität Berlin
http://bkoenig.alpha-tierchen.de/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
I've been using FreeBSD since the 3.x trains and run 5.4 now.
Can someone please bullet point the main features of 6.0, specifically the
features that 6.0 will have that 5.4 does not?
Thanks.
-Justin Franks
Ph: 415.261.0706
Fx: 925-935-6096
http://www.sfcolocation.com
__
Werner Schalk wrote:
Hi,
where can I get FreeBSD 4.1 as ISO image? I know it is *not* the latest
version but I need it to test something.
There you'll find all releases and some iso images in the ISO-IMAGES
subdirectory:
ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/old-rel
can do a network install
from. Actually there are ISOs available from those same sites. Not
sure why that page didn't find them.
ftp://ftp8.tw.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/4.1-RELEASE
ftp://ftp9.tw.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-i386/4.1.1-RELEASE
--
Dan
Hi,
where can I get FreeBSD 4.1 as ISO image? I know it is *not* the latest
version but I need it to test something.
Thanks and bye,
Werner
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To un
Stevan Tiefert wrote:
> Am Freitag, 15. April 2005 14:44 schrieb Chris:
>
>>Stevan Tiefert wrote:
>>
>>>Hello list,
>>>
>>>I have problems understanding a base concept :-(
>>>
>>>Is that right, when I install 5.2.1-RELEASE and I install the
>>>ports-distribution with cvsup and keep them up to date
Am Freitag, 15. April 2005 14:44 schrieb Chris:
> Stevan Tiefert wrote:
> > Hello list,
> >
> > I have problems understanding a base concept :-(
> >
> > Is that right, when I install 5.2.1-RELEASE and I install the
> > ports-distribution with cvsup and keep them up to date, that the ports I
> > bui
Stevan Tiefert wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I have problems understanding a base concept :-(
>
> Is that right, when I install 5.2.1-RELEASE and I install the
> ports-distribution with cvsup and keep them up to date, that the ports I
> build afterwards with "make install" are newer than the
> rele
Hello list,
I have problems understanding a base concept :-(
Is that right, when I install 5.2.1-RELEASE and I install the
ports-distribution with cvsup and keep them up to date, that the ports I
build afterwards with "make install" are newer than the
release-precompiled-packages distributed w
Stevan Tiefert wrote:
I have a small question to you! Is UTF-8 planned to be integrated in the
system like in SuSE Linux ? Maybe in the next releases or never???
What do you mean by UTF-8 integration? Many of the system utilities have been
internationalized via things like gettext and libintl
Hello list,
I have a small question to you! Is UTF-8 planned to be integrated in the
system like in SuSE Linux ? Maybe in the next releases or never???
With regards
Stevan Tiefert
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
In a message dated 11/9/04 5:24:53 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I'm not saying that's how it works, but when this thread started, that's how
> it was depicted.
>It most certainly wasn't. SInce it was me who said that releases are 'p
It most certainly wasn't. SInce it was me who said that releases are 'points
in time', which is what you have built your arguments upon since then, let me
add that the releases are 'points in time extracted from the STABLE branch'.
There is only *ONE* exception to this rul
of features
and
objectives, and when they were "done" (ie fully tested) they released it.
Personally
I think BSDi took it to extremes by making releases way too comprehensive and
would have preferred sub-relreases rather than their annoying patch system,
but
it illustrates the differe
this somewhere else (was RE: difference between
releases)
Can you please shut the fuck up and mind your own business?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[
Hello there,
For some people bandwidth is a valuable resource! Can you
please take your discussion somewhere else (e.g. freebsd-chat).
Thank you!
Manfred Riem
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questio
In a message dated 11/8/04 4:46:25 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>So we went from three losers to four bozos
Well I had to add you now, didn't I, Mrs. Butterworth? Now this is something
we can discuss. What is more insulting, being called a Loser or a Bozo?
_
In a message dated 11/8/04 5:31:33 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>So when will you switch to decaf? Seriously though, in case you didn't
>notice this IS an open source discussion list, FreeBSD 5 is not just
>another snapshot it has undergone qualification and is in my experi
ains several links that provide good
information regarding its features and bugs, such as both are known after
an extended period of real-world testing. See http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/relnotes.html> and http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/errata.html>. With this and other
>
> In a message dated 11/8/04 2:41:38 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >As far as open-open source being the only one in beta, I work in
> >development where our code is closed-source. Even we have to admit that
> >our releases fit better int
admit that
> >our releases fit better into the category of BETA than RELEASE.
> Which is pretty-much why I haven't bought or recommended anything from
> HP since the LaserJet Plus. I wonder how they feel about you revealing that?
>
I do not represent anyone but myself on thi
At 01:57 PM 11/8/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the 4 bozos who jump on everything I say will
just cut back on the coffee there wouldn't be so much BS.
In a previous message, you indicated that you were sure some people
found your posts valuable. The point you seem to be missing entirely
is that
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 12:58 PM
To: Butterworth, Thaddaeus (Manpower Contract)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: difference between releases
In a message dated 11/8/04 2:41:38 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] write
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 12:47:30PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
> I notice the same 3 losers answering over and over.
They're probably among the last people who haven't put you on their
kill-list yet. Congratulations, you're on mine now. Goodbye.
__
In a message dated 11/8/04 2:41:38 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>As far as open-open source being the only one in beta, I work in
>development where our code is closed-source. Even we have to admit that
>our releases fit better into the category of BETA than RELEA
Message: 18
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 12:47:30 EST
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: difference between releases
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
In a message dated 11/8/04 11:54:37 AM Eastern Standard
n conventional terms, yes, FreeBSD releases are something like
snapshots, so you're right in that respect. However, these
"snapshots"/releases are not really as much of a piece of beta software
as you make it out to be. Many people download, use, and test the
release prior to its
On Nov 8, 2004, at 12:47 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/8/04 11:54:37 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
on the "release", which should be a known, completed code base.
All part of the experience I suppose.
The whole world is in beta. Get over it.
Only the o
In a message dated 11/8/04 11:54:37 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> on the "release", which should be a known, completed code base.
>
> All part of the experience I suppose.
>The whole world is in beta. Get over it.
Only the open-source world.
I notice the same 3 loser
>
> In a message dated 11/8/04 10:49:14 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >> How discouraging for you not to understand that.
> >
> > Its "discouraging", because a "Release" should be " a completed set of
> > features that have been tested and thought to be bug-free"
>
> >Y
In a message dated 11/8/04 10:49:14 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> How discouraging for you not to understand that.
>
> Its "discouraging", because a "Release" should be " a completed set of
> features that have been tested and thought to be bug-free"
>You know that this i
On 2004-11-08 10:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>In a message dated 11/8/04 10:12:47 AM Eastern Standard Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>In a message dated 11/8/04 5:46:59 AM Eastern Standard Time,
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>> Releases are fixed points in time
In a message dated 11/8/04 10:12:47 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> In a message dated 11/8/04 5:46:59 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >Releases are fixed points in time. They are marked on their respective
> branch
> >o
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
