RE: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-18 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Steve Bertrand >Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 4:52 PM >To: 'David Kirchner' >Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' >Subject: RE: Release engineering confusion > > &g

Re: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread David Kirchner
On 11/16/05, Steve Bertrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of David Kirchner D'oh. I had no idea my From header looked like that. Another gmail frustration. > I do only have a handful of servers, ho

RE: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread Steve Bertrand
> > In production (at an ISP), what is the best to > follow...RELENGX_X or > > RELENG_X? I have 4.x, 5.x boxes in production, and this > >> 6.x box is > > being prepared for the same. > > See the Handbook: > > 20.2.2.2 Who Needs FreeBSD-STABLE? > >>> > >>> Than

RE: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread Steve Bertrand
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of David Kirchner > Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 7:45 PM > To: Steve Bertrand > Cc: RW; FreeBSD Questions > Subject: Re: Release engineering confusion > > On 11/16

Re: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread David Kirchner
On 11/16/05, Steve Bertrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you. However, that entire page out of the handbook pretty much > clarifies that a production environment should *not* track either STABLE > or CURRENT. > > So I'm assuming I'm best off with RELENG_6_0 etc, etc? Does anyone here > actual

Re: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
On Nov 16, 2005, at 5:45 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote: In production (at an ISP), what is the best to follow...RELENGX_X or RELENG_X? I have 4.x, 5.x boxes in production, and this 6.x box is being prepared for the same. See the Handbook: 20.2.2.2 Who Needs FreeBSD-STABLE? Thank you. How

RE: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread Steve Bertrand
> >>> In production (at an ISP), what is the best to > >> follow...RELENGX_X or > >>> RELENG_X? I have 4.x, 5.x boxes in production, and this > 6.x box is > >>> being prepared for the same. > >> > >> See the Handbook: > >> > >> 20.2.2.2 Who Needs FreeBSD-STABLE? > > > > Thank you. However, tha

RE: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread Steve Bertrand
> -Original Message- > From: Dan O'Connor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 7:31 PM > To: Steve Bertrand > Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' > Subject: Re: Release engineering confusion > > > Thank you. However, that enti

Re: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
On Nov 16, 2005, at 5:18 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote: In production (at an ISP), what is the best to follow...RELENGX_X or RELENG_X? I have 4.x, 5.x boxes in production, and this 6.x box is being prepared for the same. See the Handbook: 20.2.2.2 Who Needs FreeBSD-STABLE? Thank you. Howeve

RE: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread Steve Bertrand
> > In production (at an ISP), what is the best to > follow...RELENGX_X or > > RELENG_X? I have 4.x, 5.x boxes in production, and this 6.x box is > > being prepared for the same. > > See the Handbook: > > 20.2.2.2 Who Needs FreeBSD-STABLE? Thank you. However, that entire page out of the hand

Re: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread RW
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 23:38, Steve Bertrand wrote: > In production (at an ISP), what is the best to follow...RELENGX_X or > RELENG_X? I have 4.x, 5.x boxes in production, and this 6.x box is being > prepared for the same. See the Handbook: 20.2.2.2 Who Needs FreeBSD-STABLE? _

RE: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread Steve Bertrand
> -Original Message- > From: J.D. Bronson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 6:33 PM > To: Steve Bertrand > Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' > Subject: Re: Release engineering confusion > > At 05:16 PM 11/16/2005, Steve Bertrand wro

RE: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread Steve Bertrand
> -Original Message- > From: J.D. Bronson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 6:33 PM > To: Steve Bertrand > Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' > Subject: Re: Release engineering confusion > > At 05:16 PM 11/16/2005, Steve Bertrand wro

Re: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread J.D. Bronson
At 05:16 PM 11/16/2005, Steve Bertrand wrote: Hi all, I'm a little confused about which tags to use in my supfiles for cvsup. I've installed 6.0-RELEASE, and really want to stay with STABLE. AFAICT, in my supfile, I should have the following to do so: *default tag=RELENG_6_0 ...is that correc

Re: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 06:16:31PM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm a little confused about which tags to use in my supfiles for cvsup. > > I've installed 6.0-RELEASE, and really want to stay with STABLE. AFAICT, > in my supfile, I should have the following to do so: > > *default t

Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread Steve Bertrand
Hi all, I'm a little confused about which tags to use in my supfiles for cvsup. I've installed 6.0-RELEASE, and really want to stay with STABLE. AFAICT, in my supfile, I should have the following to do so: *default tag=RELENG_6_0 ...is that correct? I used this, and after a buildworld I got an