On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 05:02:03PM -0500, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
> On Jun 4, 2007, at 4:08 PM, Roland Smith wrote:
>
> > This is probably due to the new structure of xorg. On my system, mplayer
> > now depenws on 104 other ports (pkg_info -rx mplayer|grep Dependency:|wc
> > -l).
>
> Some depe
Ghirai wrote:
Hello Vlad,
Monday, June 4, 2007, 11:09:39 PM, you wrote:
Hello,
"Registering installation for mplayer-0.99.10_9" took about 8 minutes
(at 97% CPU-core load) of CPU time on one of the two cores on my
Pentium D 820 on a system with 1 GiB of RAM and Barr
On Jun 4, 2007, at 4:08 PM, Roland Smith wrote:
This is probably due to the new structure of xorg. On my system,
mplayer
now depenws on 104 other ports (pkg_info -rx mplayer|grep
Dependency:|wc -l).
Some dependencies will be counted multiple times that way, try
pkg_info -rx mplayer|grep
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:09:39PM +0300, Vlad GURDIGA wrote:
> Hello,
>
> "Registering installation for mplayer-0.99.10_9" took about 8 minutes
> (at 97% CPU-core load) of CPU time on one of the two cores on my
> Pentium D 820 on a system with 1 GiB of RAM and Ba
Hello Vlad,
Monday, June 4, 2007, 11:09:39 PM, you wrote:
> Hello,
> "Registering installation for mplayer-0.99.10_9" took about 8 minutes
> (at 97% CPU-core load) of CPU time on one of the two cores on my
> Pentium D 820 on a system with 1 GiB of RAM and Barracuda SAT
Hello,
"Registering installation for mplayer-0.99.10_9" took about 8 minutes
(at 97% CPU-core load) of CPU time on one of the two cores on my
Pentium D 820 on a system with 1 GiB of RAM and Barracuda SATA drive.
It looks "a little" too long to me...
Is it OK that pkg_cre
