On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 20:25:11 -0700 (MST), Warren Block
wrote:
> Labels just provide an alternate way to refer to a slice, or partition,
> or filesystem. They don't replace the normal device names.
It's worth mentioning that the /etc/fstab mechanisms for
mounting can work with ANY of the "ident
Rem P Roberti writes:
> To tell the truth, I'm content to leave things as they are, but
> unfortunately one of the side effects of all this is that I can't
> figure out how create and entry in the fstab which will again allow me
> to mount my other hard drive. The former fstab entry for that wa
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Rem P Roberti wrote:
To tell the truth, I'm content to leave things as they are, but unfortunately
one of the side effects of all this is that I can't figure out how create and
entry in the fstab which will again allow me to mount my other hard drive.
The former fstab entr
I need to ask this question again in the hopes that something will come
of it. In the process of going through an update (I finally got that
sorted out) all of my partitions were renamed. Here they are:
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity
Mounted on
On 14 February 2011 19:24, Rem P Roberti wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:38:28 -0800, Rem P Roberti wrote:
>>>
>>> I need to ask this question again in the hopes that something will come
>>> of it. In the process of going through an update (I finally got that
>>> sorted out) all of my partiti
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:38:28 -0800, Rem P Roberti wrote:
I need to ask this question again in the hopes that something will come
of it. In the process of going through an update (I finally got that
sorted out) all of my partitions were renamed. Here they are:
Filesystem 1K-blo
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:38:28 -0800, Rem P Roberti wrote:
> I need to ask this question again in the hopes that something will come
> of it. In the process of going through an update (I finally got that
> sorted out) all of my partitions were renamed. Here they are:
>
> Filesystem
I need to ask this question again in the hopes that something will come
of it. In the process of going through an update (I finally got that
sorted out) all of my partitions were renamed. Here they are:
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity
Mounted on
[Originally from freebsd-hackers@ / Feb 2008; freebsd-net Jun 2010]
All:
pf conf/63700 got the ball rolling on fixing cloned/VLAN
interface management with rc.d/netif, but a very specific problem
still remains.
For example, adding an alias to a VLAN and running:
/etc/rc.d/netif restart
On 08/23/10 16:59, Glen Barber wrote:
On 8/23/10 7:53 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
First, let's try the "vesa" thing.
Eureka! I changed Driver to "vesa" in both of the "Device" sections and
X now loads. I doubt that "vesa" is the ideal entry in the
configuration, but at this point I'm not going
On 8/23/10 7:53 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
>> First, let's try the "vesa" thing.
>>
>
> Eureka! I changed Driver to "vesa" in both of the "Device" sections and
> X now loads. I doubt that "vesa" is the ideal entry in the
> configuration, but at this point I'm not going to complain.
>
Great. It
On 08/23/10 16:33, Glen Barber wrote:
On 8/23/10 7:01 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
Ok, one quick question. When your screen goes blank, can you
[ctrl][alt][fN] to a different TTY, where N is anything between 2-7?
I'm curious about the machine's state when you start X.
No, when the screen goes bl
On 8/23/10 7:33 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> In addition, it might be helpful to build debugging options into your
> GENERIC kernel. If you're willing to go down this path, I'll help you
> get set up,
I should mention, though - I used to have issues with the nVidia driver
putting my machine in an unu
On 8/23/10 7:01 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
>> Ok, one quick question. When your screen goes blank, can you
>> [ctrl][alt][fN] to a different TTY, where N is anything between 2-7?
>> I'm curious about the machine's state when you start X.
>>
>
> No, when the screen goes blank the whole computer free
On 08/23/10 15:31, Glen Barber wrote:
On 8/23/10 5:51 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
On 08/23/10 14:34, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
I forgot. The version of PCBSD that I had installed on the Thinkpad
was the legacy version. The latest version, PCBSD 8.1, won't
On 8/23/10 5:51 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
> On 08/23/10 14:34, Warren Block wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
>>>
>>> I forgot. The version of PCBSD that I had installed on the Thinkpad
>>> was the legacy version. The latest version, PCBSD 8.1, won't
>>> install. The screen goe
On 08/23/10 14:34, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
I forgot. The version of PCBSD that I had installed on the Thinkpad
was the legacy version. The latest version, PCBSD 8.1, won't
install. The screen goes blank and the computer freezes, just as
happens when
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
I forgot. The version of PCBSD that I had installed on the Thinkpad
was the legacy version. The latest version, PCBSD 8.1, won't
install. The screen goes blank and the computer freezes, just as
happens when trying to install X11 with FreeBSD 8.1
On 08/23/10 12:11, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
I forgot to mention that previous to my installing 8.1 I had PCBSD
8.1 installed just to check it out (no likee), and the PCBSD
installer had no problem configuring X. Unfortunately, I don't have
a copy of that
On 08/23/10 12:14, Glen Barber wrote:
On 8/23/10 3:08 PM, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
Section "Device"
Identifier "Card0"
Driver "intel"
VendorName "Intel Corporation"
BoardName "82852/855GM Integrated Graphics Dev
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:08:24 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block
wrote:
Interesting, two device sections. Some notebooks actually do have two
video cards, although the R51 might not and this might just be
misdetected.
Doesn't have to be - maybe it's one VGA and
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
On 08/23/10 10:51, Glen Barber wrote:
On 8/23/10 1:44 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
Here is the xorg.conf that was created by Xorg -configure:
Section "ServerLayout"
Identifier
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:08:24 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block
wrote:
> Interesting, two device sections. Some notebooks actually do have two
> video cards, although the R51 might not and this might just be
> misdetected.
Doesn't have to be - maybe it's one VGA and one DVI output? It's also
possible
On 8/23/10 3:08 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
>
>> Section "Device"
>> Identifier "Card0"
>> Driver "intel"
>> VendorName "Intel Corporation"
>> BoardName "82852/855GM Integrated Graphics Device"
>> BusID
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
I forgot to mention that previous to my installing 8.1 I had PCBSD 8.1
installed just to check it out (no likee), and the PCBSD installer had
no problem configuring X. Unfortunately, I don't have a copy of that
xorg.conf.
PCBSD has a live mode to ru
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
Section "Device"
Identifier "Card0"
Driver "intel"
VendorName "Intel Corporation"
BoardName "82852/855GM Integrated Graphics Device"
BusID "PCI:0:2:0"
EndSection
Section "Device"
Identifier
On 08/23/10 10:59, Glen Barber wrote:
On 8/23/10 1:51 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
On 8/23/10 1:44 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
The R51 should have Mobility Radeon 7500 or 9000 graphics. Here's the
xorg.conf from my T42 with a 7500:
http://laptop.bsdgroup.de/freebsd/index.html?action=show_config&confi
On 08/23/10 10:51, Glen Barber wrote:
On 8/23/10 1:44 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
The R51 should have Mobility Radeon 7500 or 9000 graphics. Here's the
xorg.conf from my T42 with a 7500:
http://laptop.bsdgroup.de/freebsd/index.html?action=show_config&config=xconfig&laptop=12947
Here is the xo
On 8/23/10 1:51 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> On 8/23/10 1:44 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
>>
>>> The R51 should have Mobility Radeon 7500 or 9000 graphics. Here's the
>>> xorg.conf from my T42 with a 7500:
>>>
>>> http://laptop.bsdgroup.de/freebsd/index.html?action=show_config&config=xconfig&laptop=12947
On 8/23/10 1:44 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
>
>> The R51 should have Mobility Radeon 7500 or 9000 graphics. Here's the
>> xorg.conf from my T42 with a 7500:
>>
>> http://laptop.bsdgroup.de/freebsd/index.html?action=show_config&config=xconfig&laptop=12947
>>
>>
>
> Here is the xorg.conf that was cre
The R51 should have Mobility Radeon 7500 or 9000 graphics. Here's the
xorg.conf from my T42 with a 7500:
http://laptop.bsdgroup.de/freebsd/index.html?action=show_config&config=xconfig&laptop=12947
Here is the xorg.conf that was created by Xorg -configure:
---
On 08/23/10 09:21, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
Thanks to the list X11 is now running perfectly on my desktop; not so
on my Thinkpad R51. Here's what's happening. I installed xorg on
this new 8.1 installation, and have run the xorg configure program,
copyin
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
Thanks to the list X11 is now running perfectly on my desktop; not so on my
Thinkpad R51. Here's what's happening. I installed xorg on this new 8.1
installation, and have run the xorg configure program, copying the
xorg.conf.new file to /etc/X11 as x
On 8/23/10 11:53 AM, Glen Barber wrote:
> On 8/23/10 11:44 AM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
>> Thanks to the list X11 is now running perfectly on my desktop; not so
>> on my Thinkpad R51. Here's what's happening. I installed xorg on this
>> new 8.1 installation, and have run the xorg configure program,
On 8/23/10 11:44 AM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
> Thanks to the list X11 is now running perfectly on my desktop; not so
> on my Thinkpad R51. Here's what's happening. I installed xorg on this
> new 8.1 installation, and have run the xorg configure program, copying
> the xorg.conf.new file to /etc/X11
Thanks to the list X11 is now running perfectly on my desktop; not so
on my Thinkpad R51. Here's what's happening. I installed xorg on this
new 8.1 installation, and have run the xorg configure program, copying
the xorg.conf.new file to /etc/X11 as xorg.conf. I have both hald and
dbus enabl
Hi,
My CD burning woes continue. I've replaced a power supply that was
almost certainly marginal (kernel page fault failures during fsck on
two drives at once, but not on one at a time) and put a brand new
SATA DVD burner on the machine (LITE-ON iHAS124-04).
uname -a reports
FreeBSD silver.loc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> yay. i found it. in case you're ever need a visual map of your
> keyboard, give the following a try...
>
> xkbprint -color -nkg 2 -lg 1 :0 - | gv -seascape -scale 4 -
>
> naturally the man pages will give you more info regarding the
> tunable settings.
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> Ok. I hand-modified the linux-flashplugin6 shared library to remove all
> of the DT_NEEDED entries. I then modified flashpluginwrapper to add the
> following functions:
[ ... snip wrapper functions ... ]
> I installed this new version of flashpluginwrap
Ok. I hand-modified the linux-flashplugin6 shared library to remove all
of the DT_NEEDED entries. I then modified flashpluginwrapper to add the
following functions:
void __assert_fail(const char *assertion, const char *file,
unsigned int line, const char *function)
{
fprin
40 matches
Mail list logo
