On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 04:20:49PM +0200, Mel wrote:
> On Saturday 13 October 2007 02:22:31 Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> > Mel wrote:
> > > On Saturday 13 October 2007 01:15:45 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > >> Mel wrote:
> > >>> On Friday 12 October 2007 23:15:32 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > Per olof Lj
On Saturday 13 October 2007 02:22:31 Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> Mel wrote:
> > On Saturday 13 October 2007 01:15:45 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >> Mel wrote:
> >>> On Friday 12 October 2007 23:15:32 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Just out of curiosity, why did
Mel wrote:
On Saturday 13 October 2007 01:15:45 Kris Kennaway wrote:
Mel wrote:
On Friday 12 October 2007 23:15:32 Kris Kennaway wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Hi,
Just out of curiosity, why did I fail to notice the branching of
RELENG_7 and 8-CURRENT? I'm subscribed to -stable, -current an
On Saturday 13 October 2007 01:15:45 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Mel wrote:
> > On Friday 12 October 2007 23:15:32 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >> Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>> Just out of curiosity, why did I fail to notice the branching of
> >>> RELENG_7 and 8-CURRENT? I'm subscribed to -stable,
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Mel wrote:
On Friday 12 October 2007 23:15:32 Kris Kennaway wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Hi,
Just out of curiosity, why did I fail to notice the branching of
RELENG_7 and 8-CURRENT? I'm subscribed to -stable, -current and
-announce.
Because it's an administrative chan
Mel wrote:
On Friday 12 October 2007 23:15:32 Kris Kennaway wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Hi,
Just out of curiosity, why did I fail to notice the branching of
RELENG_7 and 8-CURRENT? I'm subscribed to -stable, -current and
-announce.
Because it's an administrative change that is just a norm
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 12:52:00AM +0200, Mel wrote:
> On Friday 12 October 2007 23:15:32 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > Just out of curiosity, why did I fail to notice the branching of
> > > RELENG_7 and 8-CURRENT? I'm subscribed to -stable, -current and
> > > -
Mel wrote:
On Friday 12 October 2007 23:15:32 Kris Kennaway wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Hi,
Just out of curiosity, why did I fail to notice the branching of
RELENG_7 and 8-CURRENT? I'm subscribed to -stable, -current and
-announce.
Because it's an administrative change that is just a norm
On Friday 12 October 2007 23:15:32 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Just out of curiosity, why did I fail to notice the branching of
> > RELENG_7 and 8-CURRENT? I'm subscribed to -stable, -current and
> > -announce.
>
> Because it's an administrative change that is just
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Hi,
Just out of curiosity, why did I fail to notice the branching of
RELENG_7 and 8-CURRENT? I'm subscribed to -stable, -current and -announce.
Because it's an administrative change that is just a normal part of the
release engineering process. i.e. 7.0 is not relea
>
> Just out of curiosity, why did I fail to notice the branching of
> RELENG_7 and 8-CURRENT? I'm subscribed to -stable, -current and
> -announce.
It seems it was not announced anywhere just word of mouth kind of thing
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Hi,
Just out of curiosity, why did I fail to notice the branching of
RELENG_7 and 8-CURRENT? I'm subscribed to -stable, -current and -announce.
Thanks,
Per olof
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/
12 matches
Mail list logo