Re: VirtualBox: reproductible panic

On 20.08.2013 11:21, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: > Le Fri, 09 Aug 2013 23:06:01 +0200, > David Demelier a écrit : > >> Hello, >> >> I can reproduce a panic by just starting a virtual machine with >> VirtualBox 4.2.16_2. >> >> Unfortunately, as the kmod driver is not built with debug symbols I >> co

Re: VirtualBox: reproductible panic

Le Fri, 09 Aug 2013 23:06:01 +0200, David Demelier a écrit : > Hello, > > I can reproduce a panic by just starting a virtual machine with > VirtualBox 4.2.16_2. > > Unfortunately, as the kmod driver is not built with debug symbols I > could not provide much information. Debug symbols are in op

Re: virtualbox-ose fails to build on FreeBSD 9.2-BETA2 #0 r253698

How to svn to 9-stable, make world (etc)? How to delete all installed ports? And then rm -rf /usr/local/*? Nice hints! Felix 发自我的 iPad 在 2013-8-5，3:53，John 写道： > On 02/08/2013 16:54, John wrote: >> Hello list, >> >> I'm trying to install virtualbox on a new machine running >> FreeBSD 9.2-BETA

Re: virtualbox-ose fails to build on FreeBSD 9.2-BETA2 #0 r253698

On 02/08/2013 16:54, John wrote: > Hello list, > > I'm trying to install virtualbox on a new machine running > FreeBSD 9.2-BETA2 #0 r253698. The ports version is 324162. Is it a > problem with the port or my machine? This was fixed by: commenting everything out of /etc/make.conf svn to 9-stable,

Re: VirtualBox 4.1.22 and Bridged Network problems

I have built 4.2.6 and its working again! Thank you! :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd

Re: VirtualBox 4.1.22 and Bridged Network problems

Le Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:03:36 +0100, CeDeROM a écrit : Hello, > I cannot get Bridged Network setup in VBox 4.1.22 on my 9.1RC3 AMD64 - > I get no traffic to the host interface at all. Did anyone noticed this > or related problems? Works fine here (9.1-STABLE/amd64, virtual box 4.2.6). Be sure th

Re: VirtualBox 4.1.22 and Bridged Network problems

This was brought up a few weeks/months ago and I seem to recall that setting the interface in *promiscuous* mode (monitoring) in the Host configuration (read, in your hypervisor) was mandatory. See if that helps. On Feb 6, 2013, at 3:03 PM, CeDeROM wrote: > Hello :-) > > I cannot get Bridge

Re: virtualbox with FreeBSD as host

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: > On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 20:07:44 -0500 > Fbsd8 wrote: > > Snip ... > > > So how can I run rpd on the freebsd host running the virtualbox > > server system so I can access the configured vm? I this > > configuration even possible? > > > > I'll gi

Re: virtualbox with FreeBSD as host

On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 20:07:44 -0500 Fbsd8 wrote: Snip ... > So how can I run rpd on the freebsd host running the virtualbox > server system so I can access the configured vm? I this > configuration even possible? > I'll give it one last shot. CREATE/RUNNING <> ACCESSING ! CREATE/RUN guests

Re: virtualbox with FreeBSD as host

On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: > One word answers have no meaning. > That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. > As I understand the VB manual there is only 2 ways to CREATE virtual > machines on a freebsd host. Launch VB from the host x11 de

Re: virtualbox with FreeBSD as host

andrew clarke wrote: On Sun 2012-11-18 08:50:34 UTC-0500, Fbsd8 (fb...@a1poweruser.com) wrote: By design virtualbox requires a desktop on the host to use the virtualbox built in config screens and the only way to access a configured and installed guest VM is from a remote PC with a desktop. N

Re: virtualbox with FreeBSD as host

Adam Vande More wrote: On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Fbsd8 wrote: So I was barking up the wrong tree. By design virtualbox requires a desktop on the host to use the virtualbox built in config screens False One word answers have no meaning. As I understand the VB manual there is only 2

Re: virtualbox with FreeBSD as host

On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:08:01 +1100 andrew clarke wrote: > On Sun 2012-11-18 08:50:34 UTC-0500, Fbsd8 (fb...@a1poweruser.com) wrote: > > > By design virtualbox requires a desktop on the host to use the > > virtualbox built in config screens and the only way to access a > > configured and installe

Re: virtualbox with FreeBSD as host

On Sun 2012-11-18 08:50:34 UTC-0500, Fbsd8 (fb...@a1poweruser.com) wrote: > By design virtualbox requires a desktop on the host to use the > virtualbox built in config screens and the only way to access a > configured and installed guest VM is from a remote PC with a desktop. No, you can create a

Re: virtualbox with FreeBSD as host

On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Fbsd8 wrote: > > So I was barking up the wrong tree. By design virtualbox requires a > desktop on the host to use the virtualbox built in config screens False > So the bottom line is virtualbox=desktop. > Since you can access it only by traditional server me

Re: virtualbox with FreeBSD as host

Mario Lobo wrote: On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 01:10:23 -0800 per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: Adam Vande More wrote: On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: I do not run x11 or any desktop on my 9.0 host. This would be your problem. How so? Surely virtualbox _should_ be able to hand off a VT t

Re: virtualbox with FreeBSD as host

On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 01:10:23 -0800 per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Adam Vande More wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Fbsd8 > > wrote: > > > I do not run x11 or any desktop on my 9.0 host. > > > > This would be your problem. > > How so? Surely virtualbox _should_ be able to hand off a

Re: virtualbox with FreeBSD as host

On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 01:10:23 -0800 per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: > XP itself, when running directly on the hardware, provides its own > graphics environment. It should be able to do the same running on > a VM with a virtualized keyboard, mouse, and display. Yes, but the virtualised displa

Re: virtualbox with FreeBSD as host

On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 3:10 AM, wrote: > Adam Vande More wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: > > > I do not run x11 or any desktop on my 9.0 host. > > > > This would be your problem. > > How so? Surely virtualbox _should_ be able to hand off a VT to the > XP guest, for it

Re: virtualbox with FreeBSD as host

Adam Vande More wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: > > I do not run x11 or any desktop on my 9.0 host. > > This would be your problem. How so? Surely virtualbox _should_ be able to hand off a VT to the XP guest, for it to use as a keyboard, mouse, and display. (This suppose

Re: virtualbox with FreeBSD as host

On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:18:10 -0500 Fbsd8 wrote: > > Section 23.3 of the handbook speaks about FreeBSD as a host. > No where in that section does it say anything about virtualbox > running from the FreeBSD host command line or from A Desktop. > > Do I need a Desktop f

Re: virtualbox with FreeBSD as host

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: > > I read the UserManual and think I am barking up the wrong tree. > It's called the XY problem, and it's resolved by asking better questions. > So lets start over again with what the wanted desired result is. > I have 9.0 installed on my 200g

Re: virtualbox with FreeBSD as host

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: > > Section 23.3 of the handbook speaks about FreeBSD as a host. > No where in that section does it say anything about virtualbox > running from the FreeBSD host command line or from A Desktop. > > Do I need a Desktop for virtualbo

Re: virtualbox with FreeBSD as host

Section 23.3 of the handbook speaks about FreeBSD as a host. No where in that section does it say anything about virtualbox running from the FreeBSD host command line or from A Desktop. Do I need a Desktop for virtualbox to run under? NOPE !! VBoxHeadless -startvm "vm name" Issueing Virtua

Re: virtualbox with FreeBSD as host

On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 10:44:54 -0500 Fbsd8 wrote: > Mario Lobo wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:57:53 -0500 > > Fbsd8 wrote: > > > >> Section 23.3 of the handbook speaks about FreeBSD as a host. > >> No where in that section does it say anything about virtualbox > >> running from the FreeBSD hos

Re: virtualbox with FreeBSD as host

On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 10:44:54 -0500 Fbsd8 wrote: > Mario Lobo wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:57:53 -0500 > > Fbsd8 wrote: > > > >> Section 23.3 of the handbook speaks about FreeBSD as a host. > >> No where in that section does it say anything about virtualbox > >> running from the FreeBSD hos

Re: virtualbox with FreeBSD as host

Mario Lobo wrote: On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:57:53 -0500 Fbsd8 wrote: Section 23.3 of the handbook speaks about FreeBSD as a host. No where in that section does it say anything about virtualbox running from the FreeBSD host command line or from A Desktop. Do I need a Desktop for virtualbox to run

Re: virtualbox with FreeBSD as host

On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:57:53 -0500 Fbsd8 wrote: > Section 23.3 of the handbook speaks about FreeBSD as a host. > No where in that section does it say anything about virtualbox > running from the FreeBSD host command line or from A Desktop. > > Do I need a Desktop for virtualbox to run under? > _

Re: VirtualBox Guest Addons

On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 10:58:54 +1100, Lachlan Holmes wrote: > Hey all, > > If you can help 'd really appreciate it. > > I have a 9.0 release 64bit freebsd. I've done a Portsnap fetch extract and > freebsd-update. > > I can't get virtualbox-ose-additions to install I get this error message. > > >

Re: VirtualBox Guest Addons

On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Lachlan Holmes wrote: Hey all, If you can help 'd really appreciate it. I have a 9.0 release 64bit freebsd. I've done a Portsnap fetch extract and freebsd-update. I can't get virtualbox-ose-additions to install I get this error message. # make install clean ===> virtual

Re: Virtualbox

2012-10-09 03:05, Michael Hughes skrev: On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 05:49:19 +0200 Bernt Hansson wrote: Hello list! When I try to start a virtual os in virtualbox i get an error. kldload vboxdrv.ko kldload: can't load vboxdrv.ko: Exec format error Rebuilt VB and still this error 8.2-STABLE FreeB

Re: Virtualbox

On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 05:49:19 +0200 Bernt Hansson wrote: > Hello list! > > When I try to start a virtual os in virtualbox i get an error. > > kldload vboxdrv.ko > kldload: can't load vboxdrv.ko: Exec format error > > Rebuilt VB and still this error > > 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Thu Jan

Re: Virtualbox

At 10:49 PM 10/6/2012, Bernt Hansson wrote: Hello list! When I try to start a virtual os in virtualbox i get an error. kldload vboxdrv.ko kldload: can't load vboxdrv.ko: Exec format error Rebuilt VB and still this error 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Thu Jan 12 15:13:06 CET 2012 GENERIC am

Re: Virtualbox

On Sun, 7 Oct 2012, Bernt Hansson wrote: Hello list! When I try to start a virtual os in virtualbox i get an error. kldload vboxdrv.ko kldload: can't load vboxdrv.ko: Exec format error Rebuilt VB and still this error 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Thu Jan 12 15:13:06 CET 2012 GENERIC amd6

Re: Virtualbox

On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Bernt Hansson wrote: > When I try to start a virtual os in virtualbox i get an error. > > kldload vboxdrv.ko > kldload: can't load vboxdrv.ko: Exec format error > > Rebuilt VB and still this error > > 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Thu Jan 12 15:13:06 CET 2012

Re: VirtualBox USB support

27.12.2011 19:55, Alain G. Fabry wrote: Hello in the FreeBSD handbook it mentions there's USB support in Virtualbox. In other sources I read however that the VBoxPuelMain module is not supported in FreeBSD. VirtualBox comes with basic USB support, extension pack provides USB2.0 support.

Re: virtualbox 4.0

On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 07:38:23AM -0600, Warren Block wrote: Recent versions of VirtualBox claim to be able to run a 64-bit VM on a 32-bit host if the host CPU is 64-bit and has hardware virtualization support: http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewto

Re: virtualbox 4.0

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 07:38:23AM -0600, Warren Block wrote: > Recent versions of VirtualBox claim to be able to run a 64-bit VM on a > 32-bit host if the host CPU is 64-bit and has hardware virtualization > support: http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?p=33940 > (search for "64-bit gues

Re: virtualbox 4.0

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Warren Block wrote: > Recent versions of VirtualBox claim to be able to run a 64-bit VM on a > 32-bit host if the host CPU is 64-bit and has hardware virtualization > support: http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?p=33940 > (search for "64-bit guest") > > So

Re: virtualbox 4.0

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 01:18:15PM +0200, Ross Cameron wrote: > > You have more than likely configured a 32bit virtual machine and not a 64bit > one. > Make that change to you're VM config and you will more than likely come > right. > > Is you're host operating system also 64bit? It has been

Re: virtualbox 4.0

On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 21/07/2011 09:48, Minipot Gregg wrote: It installed fine but when I got to the boot menu and pressed [enter] x2 it said CPU doesnt support longmode This indicates trying to run an amd64 (64bit) kernel on an i386 (32bit) processor. That's a synthe

Re: virtualbox 4.0

Hi there Gregg You have more than likely configured a 32bit virtual machine and not a 64bit one. Make that change to you're VM config and you will more than likely come right. Is you're host operating system also 64bit? Regards,... Ross Cameron eMail : ross.came...@unix.net Phone : +27 (0

Re: virtualbox 4.0

On 21/07/2011 09:48, Minipot Gregg wrote: > It installed fine but when I got to the boot menu and pressed [enter] x2 it > said CPU doesnt support longmode This indicates trying to run an amd64 (64bit) kernel on an i386 (32bit) processor. That's a synthetic processor inside VirtualBox, so unlike t

Re: Virtualbox on 8.2 64-bit (cont)

On Jun 14, 2011, at 3:40 PM, Rob wrote: > When 8.3 comes out, what do I need to do to update the src tree? This may be > documented in the UPDATING docs, but having never messed with the source tree > I haven't had cause to look. If so just tell me to go read the respective > doc. :) Read the

Re: Virtualbox on 8.2 64-bit (cont)

On 6/14/11 4:52 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: Also, do you know the difference between pre-built packages on the freebsd ftp server in packages-8.2-release vs packages-8-stable? Well, IF you installed the source tree from the SAME cd which you installed the FreeBSD you have now, there won't be any pr

Re: Virtualbox on 8.2 64-bit (cont)

On 6/14/11 8:06 AM, Ondrej Majerech wrote: On 06/09/2011 15:49, Rob wrote: On 6/6/11 8:39 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: You need to rebuild your kernel with options COMPAT_FREEBSD32 # Compatible with i386 binaries included. I noticed that when I tried to build the ports, but I don't have anythi

Re: Virtualbox on 8.2 64-bit (cont)

On Monday 13 June 2011 21:14:05 Rob wrote: > On 6/9/11 4:55 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: > > On Thursday 09 June 2011 10:49:37 Rob wrote: > >> On 6/6/11 8:39 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: > >>> On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote: > I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this

Re: Virtualbox on 8.2 64-bit (cont)

On 06/09/2011 15:49, Rob wrote: On 6/6/11 8:39 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: You need to rebuild your kernel with options COMPAT_FREEBSD32 # Compatible with i386 binaries included. I noticed that when I tried to build the ports, but I don't have anything in /usr/src and no information was given

Re: Virtualbox on 8.2 64-bit (cont)

On 6/9/11 4:55 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: On Thursday 09 June 2011 10:49:37 Rob wrote: On 6/6/11 8:39 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote: I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this weekend, and hit a rather curious situation. The pre-package

Re: Virtualbox on 8.2 64-bit (cont)

On Thursday 09 June 2011 10:49:37 Rob wrote: > On 6/6/11 8:39 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: > > On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote: > >> I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this > >> weekend, and hit a rather curious situation. The pre-packaged version > >> of virtualb

Re: Virtualbox on 8.2 64-bit (cont)

On 6/6/11 8:39 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote: I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this weekend, and hit a rather curious situation. The pre-packaged version of virtualbox retrievable by pkg_add is 3.2.12 (which looks in ports/amd64

Re: Virtualbox on 8.2 64-bit

On Monday 06 June 2011 22:31:30 Rob wrote: > On 6/6/11 8:13 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: > > On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote: > >> I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this > >> weekend, and hit a rather curious situation. The pre-packaged version > >> of virtualbox

Re: Virtualbox on 8.2 64-bit (cont)

On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote: > I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this > weekend, and hit a rather curious situation. The pre-packaged version > of virtualbox retrievable by pkg_add is 3.2.12 (which looks in > ports/amd64/packages-8.2-release). Poking

Re: Virtualbox on 8.2 64-bit

On 6/6/11 8:13 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote: I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this weekend, and hit a rather curious situation. The pre-packaged version of virtualbox retrievable by pkg_add is 3.2.12 (which looks in ports/amd64

Re: Virtualbox on 8.2 64-bit

On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote: > I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this > weekend, and hit a rather curious situation. The pre-packaged version > of virtualbox retrievable by pkg_add is 3.2.12 (which looks in > ports/amd64/packages-8.2-release). Poking

Re: Virtualbox - no /dev/acd0 in VM even if it's booting from CD [SOLVED]

On 01/24/11 21:44, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: 24.01.2011 15:22, Arthur Chance wrote: I just upgraded to virtualbox-ose-3.2.12 (ditto the vbox kmod port), and then tried to install a new VM. It booted from the CD fine but sysinstall reported that it couldn't find a CD drive to install from. Bootin

Re: Virtualbox - no /dev/acd0 in VM even if it's booting from CD

24.01.2011 15:22, Arthur Chance wrote: I just upgraded to virtualbox-ose-3.2.12 (ditto the vbox kmod port), and then tried to install a new VM. It booted from the CD fine but sysinstall reported that it couldn't find a CD drive to install from. Booting another VM that already existed showed the s

Re: Virtualbox - no /dev/acd0 in VM even if it's booting from CD

On 01/24/11 14:19, Chris Brennan wrote: On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Arthur Chance wrote: I just upgraded to virtualbox-ose-3.2.12 (ditto the vbox kmod port), and then tried to install a new VM. It booted from the CD fine but sysinstall reported that it couldn't find a CD drive to install

Re: Virtualbox - no /dev/acd0 in VM even if it's booting from CD

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Arthur Chance wrote: > I just upgraded to virtualbox-ose-3.2.12 (ditto the vbox kmod port), and > then tried to install a new VM. It booted from the CD fine but sysinstall > reported that it couldn't find a CD drive to install from. Booting another > VM that alrea

Re: virtualbox-ose port broken?

Quoth Beat Gaetzi on Tuesday, 30 November 2010: > On 30.11.2010 19:54, Chip Camden wrote: > > As of this morning's portsnap (Tue Nov 30 10:35:59 PST 2010), > > virtualbox-ose no longer builds: > > > > # cd /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose && make install clean 2>&1 | tail > > -n 25 > > kBuild:

Re: virtualbox-ose port broken?

On 30.11.2010 19:54, Chip Camden wrote: > As of this morning's portsnap (Tue Nov 30 10:35:59 PST 2010), > virtualbox-ose no longer builds: > > # cd /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose && make install clean 2>&1 | tail -n > 25 > kBuild: Adjusting BCC Assembly PcBiosBin - > /usr/ports/emulators/vi

Re: VirtualBox: Pressing some key few times fast causes an event storm

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Yuri wrote: > But I have this problem with guest additions. > I can't reproduce it. Does you CPU support virtualization extensions eg VT and is it turned on? Is your guest additions in sync with your VBox version? Are you running the latest VBox? -- Adam Van

Re: VirtualBox: Pressing some key few times fast causes an event storm

On 10/07/2010 17:29, Adam Vande More wrote: On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Yuri > wrote: On 10/06/2010 16:33, Adam Vande More wrote: Yes, it is not specific to FreeBSD and really not even specific to VirtualBox since VMware guests can also experience

Re: VirtualBox: Pressing some key few times fast causes an event storm

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Yuri wrote: > On 10/06/2010 16:33, Adam Vande More wrote: > >> >> Yes, it is not specific to FreeBSD and really not even specific to >> VirtualBox since VMware guests can also experience the issue. There are >> resolutions to it, if you bother to look. >> > > I fo

Re: VirtualBox: Pressing some key few times fast causes an event storm

On 10/06/2010 16:33, Adam Vande More wrote: Yes, it is not specific to FreeBSD and really not even specific to VirtualBox since VMware guests can also experience the issue. There are resolutions to it, if you bother to look. -- Adam Vande More I found some references with recommendations

Re: VirtualBox: Pressing some key few times fast causes an event storm

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Yuri wrote: > I run Ubuntu guest on FreeBSD host. > I am in Open Accessories/Terminal app > > I get this quite often: when I press some button fast few times it gets > pressed endless number of times. This can be Enter after some command. Or > Up/Down on some large

Re: VirtualBox: out of swap space

On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 17:37:39 +0200, Samuel Martín Moro wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm trying to have a few BSD VMs (4.7, 5.5, 6.2, 7.2, 8.1) > running under VirtualBox-OSE / FreeBSD-8.1-RELEASE-amd64 > > > First problem: > Sometimes, when I start a VM, all other running VM stop, > their status swit

Re: virtualbox

Quoth Adam Vande More on Sunday, 08 August 2010: > On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Chip Camden > wrote: > > > Just to follow up, as part of my Bugathon participation I created a VM with > > 8.1-RELEASE as a guest for testing. The i386 version is running like a > > champ. I > > couldn't get the

Re: virtualbox

On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, Chip Camden wrote: When running Xorg under VirtualBox, I had to add the following to xorg.conf to get the keyboard and mouse to respond: Section "ServerFlags" Option "AutoAddDevices" "off" EndSection As with a physical machine, that is only needed to disable hal i

Re: virtualbox

On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Chip Camden wrote: > Just to follow up, as part of my Bugathon participation I created a VM with > 8.1-RELEASE as a guest for testing. The i386 version is running like a > champ. I > couldn't get the amd64 iso to boot under VirtualBox, though. It just > appeared

Re: virtualbox

Quoth Chip Camden on Thursday, 05 August 2010: > Quoth Brandon Gooch on Thursday, 05 August 2010: > > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:53 PM, kalin m wrote: > > > > > > > > > hi all.. > > > > > > just wondering how mature is virtualbox to be used with freebsd - either > > > as > > > host or as guest. is

Re: virtualbox

On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 06:19:51PM +0200, Samuel Martín Moro wrote: > Very powerfull, indeed > too bad vrdp doesn't work on OSE... It works great with the VNC server replacement. I've got this running on 8-STABLE/amd64. -- Jonathan Chen ---

Re: virtualbox

segfaults... gdb's backtrace speak about nanosleep, or XDisplayCodes, ... lambda:~/package# pkg_info | grep -i sdl sdl-1.2.14_1,2 Cross-platform multimedia development API lambda:~/package# pkg_info | grep -i virtualbox virtualbox-ose-3.2.6 A general-purpose full virtualizer for x86 hardwar

Re: virtualbox

On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Samuel Martín Moro wrote: > Very powerfull, indeed > too bad vrdp doesn't work on OSE... > True, but a VNC server was recently added to the OSE edition instead: http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/6020 -Noah ___ freebsd-que

Re: virtualbox

Very powerfull, indeed too bad vrdp doesn't work on OSE... Samuel Martín Moro {EPITECH.} tek4 CamTrace S.A.S (+033) 1 41 38 37 60 1 Allée de la Venelle 92150 Suresnes FRANCE "Nobody wants to say how this works. Maybe nobody knows ..." Xorg.conf(5) On Fri, Aug 6,

Re: virtualbox

Quoth Adam Vande More on Thursday, 05 August 2010: > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:17 PM, kalin m wrote: > > > > > > > awesome... i will. i'm basically intending to use it for production > > servers. i'll give it try... > > > > was reading something about not supporting usb... how about serial por

Re: virtualbox

On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:17 PM, kalin m wrote: > > > awesome...  i will.  i'm basically intending to use it for production > servers. i'll give it try... > > was reading something about not supporting usb...  how about serial ports? Unfortunately, the OSE edition of VirtualBox doesn't support US

Re: virtualbox

On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:17 PM, kalin m wrote: > > > awesome... i will. i'm basically intending to use it for production > servers. i'll give it try... > > was reading something about not supporting usb... how about serial ports? > > i was reading the documentation. not much there... how abo

Re: virtualbox

awesome... i will. i'm basically intending to use it for production servers. i'll give it try... was reading something about not supporting usb... how about serial ports? i was reading the documentation. not much there... how about management, data backup and recovery? real time vm swap

Re: virtualbox

Quoth Brandon Gooch on Thursday, 05 August 2010: > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:53 PM, kalin m wrote: > > > > > > hi all.. > > > > just wondering how mature is virtualbox to be used with freebsd - either as > > host or as guest. is viable to be used in production environment? > > > > >From my experi

Re: virtualbox

On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:53 PM, kalin m wrote: > > > hi all.. > > just wondering how mature is virtualbox to be used with freebsd - either as > host or as guest. is viable to be used in production environment? > >From my experience (running the latest 3.2.6 on 8.1-RELEASE, 8-STABLE, and 9-CURREN

Re: Virtualbox Networking Issues

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Chris Maness wrote: > Things I tried: > > With all three vbox module inserted into the kernel > > NAT, Bridge, with the PC-Net FAST Not able to ping anything (even the > gateway) I also tried ifconfig by hand > NAT, Bridge, and Host-only with the first intel car

Re: Virtualbox Networking Issues

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Remko Lodder wrote: > > On Jul 16, 2010, at 12:05 AM, Chris Maness wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Remko Lodder wrote: >>> On Jul 15, 2010, at 11:57 PM, Chris Maness wrote: >>> I tried the second Intel adapter in the list and it worked under brid

Re: Virtualbox Networking Issues

On Jul 16, 2010, at 12:05 AM, Chris Maness wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Remko Lodder wrote: >> On Jul 15, 2010, at 11:57 PM, Chris Maness wrote: >> >>> I tried the second Intel adapter in the list and it worked under bridge >>> mode. >> >> >> This is really unsatisfying, can you

Re: Virtualbox Networking Issues

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Remko Lodder wrote: > On Jul 15, 2010, at 11:57 PM, Chris Maness wrote: > >> I tried the second Intel adapter in the list and it worked under bridge mode. > > > This is really unsatisfying, can you generate an ifconfig -a and report it > back so that we can see wh

Re: Virtualbox Networking Issues

On Jul 15, 2010, at 11:57 PM, Chris Maness wrote: > I tried the second Intel adapter in the list and it worked under bridge mode. This is really unsatisfying, can you generate an ifconfig -a and report it back so that we can see what you did? did you assign multiple interfaces to the machine? a

Re: Virtualbox Networking Issues

I tried the second Intel adapter in the list and it worked under bridge mode. Thanks, Chris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-uns

Re: Virtualbox Networking Issues

> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:35:23 -0700 > From: Chris Maness > Subject: Re: Virtualbox Networking Issues > > I am not able to ping anything. I cannot ping the gateway or the > host. I tried bridge, NAT, and host only. > Really, not _anything_ ?? how about 127.0.0.1 ? H

Re: Virtualbox Networking Issues

On Jul 15, 2010, at 11:35 PM, Chris Maness wrote: > I am not able to ping anything. I cannot ping the gateway or the > host. I tried bridge, NAT, and host only. > > Chris OK, and what does tcpdump tell you about the interface? is it passing traffic at all? -- /"\ Best regards,

Re: Virtualbox Networking Issues

On 15 July 2010 17:35, Chris Maness wrote: > I am not able to ping anything.  I cannot ping the gateway or the > host.  I tried bridge, NAT, and host only. Can you provide the output of ifconfig and the contents of rc.conf from the virtual machine? (Purpose - to see if the interface exists, wha

Re: Virtualbox Networking Issues

> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Jul 15 16:22:58 2010 > Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:20:50 -0700 > From: Chris Maness > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Virtualbox Networking Issues > > I have all the pertinent kernel modules loaded, and I have tried all > different combina

Re: Virtualbox Networking Issues

I am not able to ping anything. I cannot ping the gateway or the host. I tried bridge, NAT, and host only. Chris On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Remko Lodder wrote: > > On Jul 15, 2010, at 11:20 PM, Chris Maness wrote: > >> I have all the pertinent kernel modules loaded, and I have tried all

Re: Virtualbox Networking Issues

On Jul 15, 2010, at 11:20 PM, Chris Maness wrote: > I have all the pertinent kernel modules loaded, and I have tried all > different combination of network settings in virtualbox. This is a > FreeBSD host running on a FreeBSD client. > > Any suggestions appreciated. > > Suggestion 1: What ar

Re: Virtualbox installation failed at Cmake on 8.0 Stable

On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Xihong Yin wrote: > There's the culprit right there. Have you tried executing java -version to >> see if you have a problem with your java runtime? >> > > You are right. The 'java -version' returns an error. I installed the > diablo-jdk1.6 for Freebsd 7x. So which

Re: Virtualbox installation failed at Cmake on 8.0 Stable

There's the culprit right there. Have you tried executing java -version to see if you have a problem with your java runtime? You are right. The 'java -version' returns an error. I installed the diablo-jdk1.6 for Freebsd 7x. So which java shall I install for 8 Stable? On Sun, 23 May 2010, Rei

Re: Virtualbox installation failed at Cmake on 8.0 Stable

On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Xihong Yin wrote: > I am trying to install Virutalbox on my Freebsd 8.0 Stable #2. However, > the installation failed at cmake-2.8.1. Here is the error message I got. > Could you help? > > c++ -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott > -I/usr/ports/devel/c

Re: VirtualBox: no network

I'm using the default adapter, that's the intel desktop one I think. Establishing the connection with DHCP is indeed a bit inconsistent. Sometimes it's there just after boot, sometimes it scans for half a minute before making the connection. No problems with DNS. So far I tested browsing and softwa

Re: VirtualBox: no network

Ondrej Majerech wrote: Anselm Strauss wrote: I switched to NAT networking for now. It doesn't require any modules to load besides the vboxdrv.ko and runs stable so far. Only strange that ICMP is not working ... NAT networking doesn't work for me. Which Adapter Type are you using? And did y

Re: VirtualBox: no network

Anselm Strauss wrote: I switched to NAT networking for now. It doesn't require any modules to load besides the vboxdrv.ko and runs stable so far. Only strange that ICMP is not working ... NAT networking doesn't work for me. Which Adapter Type are you using? And did you have to do any further

Re: VirtualBox: no network

I switched to NAT networking for now. It doesn't require any modules to load besides the vboxdrv.ko and runs stable so far. Only strange that ICMP is not working ... On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Anselm Strauss wrote: > Okay, so it works with the stock kernel when I don't load the module and

  1   2   >