Re: using 5.0-RELEASE

2002-11-24 Thread Roman Neuhauser
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-11-25 00:26:32 +0100: > just a question to the possibilies using 5.0-RELEASE. In the "early > adopters guide" (chapter 1) it's written, that 5.0-RELEASE should be as > stable as possible to "getting a large number of users to test". But if > it's not recommented to use

Re: using 5.0-RELEASE

2002-11-24 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 12:26:32AM +0100, Jens Rehsack wrote: > Hi, > > just a question to the possibilies using 5.0-RELEASE. In the "early > adopters guide" (chapter 1) it's written, that 5.0-RELEASE should be as > stable as possible to "getting a large number of users to test". But if > it's

Re: using 5.0-RELEASE

2002-11-24 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
Please do not cross-post to lists! On 2002-11-25 00:26, Jens Rehsack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > just a question to the possibilies using 5.0-RELEASE. In the "early > adopters guide" (chapter 1) it's written, that 5.0-RELEASE should be as > stable as possible to "getting a large number

Re: using 5.0-RELEASE

2002-11-24 Thread Scott Robbins
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 12:26:32AM +0100, Jens Rehsack wrote: > Hi, > > just a question to the possibilies using 5.0-RELEASE. In the "early > adopters guide" (chapter 1) it's written, that 5.0-RELEASE should be as > stable as possible to "getting a large number of users to test". But if > it's