Re: sh script code to get file size.

2013-01-18 Thread Robert Bonomi
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Jan 18 17:30:31 2013 > Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:26:54 -0500 > From: Fbsd8 > To: FreeBSD questions > Subject: sh script code to get file size. > > In a script in am working on I need to find out the allocated > size of a sparse file. > The only comm

Re: sh script code to get file size.

2013-01-18 Thread Chris Hill
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, Fbsd8 wrote: In a script in am working on I need to find out the allocated size of a sparse file. The only command that comes to mind is "ls -lh" The "du -h" command is not appropriate because it will show the occupied size and not the allocated size. I don't know how to pa

Re: sh script code to get file size.

2013-01-18 Thread Fbsd8
Chris Hill wrote: On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, Fbsd8 wrote: In a script in am working on I need to find out the allocated size of a sparse file. The only command that comes to mind is "ls -lh" The "du -h" command is not appropriate because it will show the occupied size and not the allocated size. I d

Re: sh script code to get file size.

2013-01-18 Thread Fbsd8
In a script in am working on I need to find out the allocated size of a sparse file. The only command that comes to mind is "ls -lh" The "du -h" command is not appropriate because it will show the occupied size and not the allocated size. I don't know how to parse out to the position in the ou

Re: sh script code to get file size.

2013-01-18 Thread Vincent Hoffman
On 18/01/2013 23:26, Fbsd8 wrote: > In a script in am working on I need to find out the allocated > size of a sparse file. > The only command that comes to mind is "ls -lh" > The "du -h" command is not appropriate because it will show > the occupied size and not the allocated size. > > I don't know

Re: sh script code to get file size.

2013-01-18 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jan 18), Fbsd8 said: > In a script in am working on I need to find out the allocated > size of a sparse file. > The only command that comes to mind is "ls -lh" > The "du -h" command is not appropriate because it will show > the occupied size and not the allocated size. > > I d