On 2006-09-13 17:56, Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hosts.allow triggers special behaviour with sendmail. Unlike other
> services which just close the connection immediately, with sendmail
> what happens is that it will accept the connection, let the sender
> attempt to send e-mail, b
On 2006-09-13 19:37, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2006-09-13 11:14, Kevin Kinsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I am attempting to block an SMTP server with /etc/hosts.allow:
> >
> > --
> > Received: f
Robert Huff wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas writes:
I don't think you can have the hostnames in a separate "map file"
and then reference this file from /etc/hosts.allow.
The port security/denyhosts does exactly that. (And it seems
to work.)
Robert Huff
I
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2006-09-13 11:14, Kevin Kinsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am attempting to block an SMTP server with /etc/hosts.allow:
>>
>> --
>> Received: from 241net251.net.zeork.com.pl (241net251.net.zeo
Giorgos Keramidas writes:
> I don't think you can have the hostnames in a separate "map file"
> and then reference this file from /etc/hosts.allow.
The port security/denyhosts does exactly that. (And it seems
to work.)
Robert Huff
On 2006-09-13 11:14, Kevin Kinsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am attempting to block an SMTP server with /etc/hosts.allow:
>
> --
> Received: from 241net251.net.zeork.com.pl (241net251.net.zeork.com.pl
> [194.117.241.251] (
