On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:22:08AM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Do you need mapi? You can build gnome without it. Otherwise, you'll
> need to install 3.x to a non-standard prefix, or use 4.0.
>
Hi,
Thanks much for the hints. In the meantime I was (almost) settled with
going for 4.0alpha, b
Ewald Jenisch writes:
> For quite some time now I'm trying to get samba 3.x installed on my
> FreeBSD 7.2 System.
>
> The symptoms in short:
>
> o) 3.0 - doesn't compile
>
> o) 3.2, 3.3 - can't be installed because of installation dependencies
> to samba4-devel-4.0.0.a8_2, talloc-1.3.1 and tdb-1.
On Wednesday 23 December 2009 04:51:24 Ewald Jenisch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For quite some time now I'm trying to get samba 3.x installed on my
> FreeBSD 7.2 System.
>
> The symptoms in short:
>
> o) 3.0 - doesn't compile
>
> o) 3.2, 3.3 - can't be installed because of installation dependencies
> to
Ewald Jenisch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For quite some time now I'm trying to get samba 3.x installed on my
> FreeBSD 7.2 System.
>
> The symptoms in short:
>
> o) 3.0 - doesn't compile
>
> o) 3.2, 3.3 - can't be installed because of installation dependencies
> to samba4-devel-4.0.0.a8_2, talloc-1.3.1
hi,
> Where did you get samba4? How did you download?
> How did you compile on FreeBSD? You can share your ./configure args?
have a look into the mail I just posted on freebsd-questions, it
includes links to the samba wiki where installation is explained in
detail.
> And your smb.conf and loop
lf Of Mister Olli
> Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 7:18 AM
> To: Tim Judd
> Cc: Olivier Nicole; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; redt...@sbcglobal.net
> Subject: Re: Samba3 domain controller howto?
>
> hi,
>
> > yes, you are mis-understanding
> >
> > samba itself
hi,
> yes, you are mis-understanding
>
> samba itself is a NT4-type domain.
not quite right. It depends on the samba version your using.
- samba3 only provides NT4-type domains
- samba4 provides active directory domain types including GPO (I have
such a setup running in 7. with around 10 users. I
yes, you are mis-understanding
samba itself is a NT4-type domain.
samba can use authentication backends that include passwd files, LDAP
and kerberos. Active directory is a requirement to use LDAP, whereas
samba is offering it as a auth backend only.
fine line, I know.
IOW, whereas Active Direc
Hi,
> Samba is still only a NT4-type
> DC, no Active Directory type of function (Group Policies, u...@domain
> logins, kerberos, ldap, etc)
I am not sure if I understand you well, but my samba is authenticating
users agaiinst LDAP.
Best regards,
Olivier
_
On 6/7/09, Mark Busby wrote:
>
>
>
> --- On Sun, 6/7/09, Dave wrote:
>
>> From: Dave
>> Subject: Samba3 domain controller howto?
>> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>> Date: Sunday, June 7, 2009, 6:28 AM
>> Hello,
>> I've found a lot of this for LInux, but
>> am looking for something
>> Fre
--- On Sun, 6/7/09, Dave wrote:
> From: Dave
> Subject: Samba3 domain controller howto?
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Date: Sunday, June 7, 2009, 6:28 AM
> Hello,
> I've found a lot of this for LInux, but
> am looking for something
> FreeBSD specific. I'm wanting to set up a FreeB
On Mar 23, 2007, at 3:51 PM, Vizion wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 11:29 AM
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: samba3 compile failure
On
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Vizion wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vizion
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 8:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: samba3 compile failure
Vizion wrote:
I am trying to compile
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vizion
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 10:31 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: samba3 compile failure
>
>
>
> > -Original Messag
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Garrett Cooper
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 7:55 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: samba3 compile failure
>
> Vizion wrote:
> > I am tryin
Vizion wrote:
I am trying to compile samba...
Is the cause something up with my kerberos installation (see errors below)?
If so I do not know how to fix it :-(
If not what and how can I fix it??
Is any more information needed to help identify the cause of the compile
failure?
Thanks in advan
Steve Franks wrote:
Hi,
Pretty much vanilla install as per the handbook. Had to change from
smbpasswd to tdbpasswd to get it working, but that's the only non-standard
operation I did.
Title says it all. Thought it might be a permissions problem, but I can
walk the whole tree when logged on to
On 8/2/06, Ivan Levchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello All,
Just tried to install samba3 from ports ( yes i just updated ports
with portsnap) and i got this error:
===> samba-3.0.23,1 broken IPC and code.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/net/samba3.
*** Error code 1
Whats up with it
I ran into the same problem when I was installing it, and I found this
answer:
> You need to run 'make config' and uncheck AIO and SMBSH options. They
> are broken at the moment and, possibly, won't even compile.
> Alternatively, you can just run 'make rmconfig' and compile port with
> the
Aguiar Magalhaes wrote:
List,
I´ve installed Samba3 on a FreeBSD 5.4 server. The
shared directories are see in winXP machines and
they´ve worked correctly using the local users
(created by adduser script with nologin)
In the same network, when I use the same users in
win9x machines, I´ve recei
Help please! I can't make my lab to university =(
P> subj.
P> I must setting up PDC: unix server and win-clients. But samba not
P> compiling =(
P> Samba 3.0.14a (and trying with 3.0.13)
P> krb5-1.3.4_2
P> openldap-2.2.15 with sasl
P> uname -a
P> FreeBSD freebsd53.localdomain 5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 15:19:46 +0100
"Colin J. Raven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> It would seem as if my HP psc2105 printer is recognised under
> FreeBSD-5.3, but of course there are some minor issues.
> Without reopening old wounds lpd(?) vs CUPS, this is what I'm getting
> from /var/log/me
Ok, I answer myself:
I get this achieved by installing port in /usr/port/sysutils/lookupd which emulates
nsswitch resolver. After that i made a symlink in /usr/local/lib from lkpd_nss.so.1 to
nss_dns.so.1 and all seems to work.
hope this will help.
regards,
Santo Natale
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 0
23 matches
Mail list logo
