Re: Routed and netmask...

2007-02-05 Thread Nikos Vassiliadis
On Saturday 03 February 2007 22:08, Thiago Esteves de Oliveira wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using "FreeBSD 6.2 Stable" with routed to connect networks(gateway) > > >THE INTERNET > | > | > > | eee.eee.eee.0/26 | > --

RE: Routed and netmask...

2007-02-03 Thread Grzegorz Pluta
> The top interface address is wrong. It cant be eee.eee.eee.11 with /26 > mask. > The lowest address with this mask is 193. Ops... I'm wrong here ofcourse... The address is correct ;] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.

RE: Routed and netmask...

2007-02-03 Thread Grzegorz Pluta
If eee.eee.eee.0/26 is a separate network (wich i guess it is) there needs to be a routing device there too. How can a packet find its way to the internet? The router sees only eee.eee.eee.o network on its port (not mentioning the iii.iii.iii.0 network from wich the packet travels) It is also poss

Re: routed vpn between two freebsd machines

2005-09-16 Thread Frank Mueller - emendis GmbH
10.8.0.1 is your servers IP! According to the manpage the parameter "server 10.8.0.0 255.255.255.0" sets therouter to 10.8.0.1. Why do you push a route to 192.168.2.0/24 ??? Do you have such a subnet? Greetz, Ice dave schrieb: Hello, My apologies if this is a repost i didn't see it go thro

Re: routed daemon

2005-05-17 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Jim Pazarena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can the routed daemon co-exist with a CISCO router which, by default, > also responds to routing requests? > > The reason I ask, is that I accidentally installed routed, and it > was running, and my whole network came to a grinding halt, until > I de-act

Re: routed(8)

2004-04-22 Thread Thomas Beer
Try to put two lines in /etc/gateways if=fxp2 passive if=fxp3 passive Cheers Tom > Is it possible to have routed(8) ignore certain ethernet interfaces. > > For example, on a device with fxp[0-3], I only need routed to > interact with fxp[0-1], and to ignore the existence of fxp[2-3]. > > TIA, >

Re: routed

2003-12-15 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:33:20 -0800 (PST) Valerian Galeru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I want to understand about these routing tables I > run route flush (to remove all routes, gateways...). > Yes, all the routes are deleted(i try a web browser > and i get an error), but when i run netstat -r

Solved! Was: Re: routed 'forgets' it's path (or something)

2003-06-27 Thread freeBSD
Odd, but the soo simple solution which however I can't explain was to do a: route add default 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1 is my gateway) If someone can explain how the system could work for a while after the route daemon was started and then suddenly forget all routing tables it would be great, h