On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 12:11:24AM +0200, Gabriel Rossetti wrote:
> Jerry McAllister wrote:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:07:58AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On 24/05/07, kalin mintchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> so nobody on this list knows anything about raid
Jerry McAllister wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:07:58AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>> On 24/05/07, kalin mintchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> so nobody on this list knows anything about raid?
>>> wrong list?
>>>
>>>
hi all..
i have a box in a remote
> -Original Message-
> From: kalin mintchev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2007 5:04 AM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: raid or not raid
>
>
> >
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of kalin mintchev
>> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 4:11 PM
>> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: raid or not ra
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of kalin mintchev
> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 4:11 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: raid or not raid
>
>
> > On Thu, May 24
> On Fri, 25 May 2007 04:37:25 -0400 (EDT)
> "kalin mintchev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> replying to your email down the thread...but using this content...
>
>> L(q) ops/sr/s kBps ms/rw/s kBps ms/w %busy Name
>> 0 6 66278.5 0 00.05.0|
On Fri, 25 May 2007 04:37:25 -0400 (EDT)
"kalin mintchev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
replying to your email down the thread...but using this content...
> L(q) ops/sr/s kBps ms/rw/s kBps ms/w %busy Name
> 0 6 66278.5 0 00.05.0| ad4
The a
On Fri, 25 May 2007 15:41:28 +0700 (ICT)
Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > how come there is ad4s1b and ad4s1c when those names don't appear in the
> > fstab or df?
>
because df shows mounted disks, and fstab what to mount. neither of them affect
b (usually swap) or c (as per Olivi
>> how come there is ad4s1b and ad4s1c when those names don't appear in the
>> fstab or df?
>
> Very often ad4s1b will be the swap and ad4s1c the full slice.
>
> That is not an absolute rule, but it is very much recommended (at
> least for ad4s1c) to keep it equivalent to the full slice.
but there
> how come there is ad4s1b and ad4s1c when those names don't appear in the
> fstab or df?
Very often ad4s1b will be the swap and ad4s1c the full slice.
That is not an absolute rule, but it is very much recommended (at
least for ad4s1c) to keep it equivalent to the full slice.
Olivier
___
> On Thu, 24 May 2007 19:11:27 -0400 (EDT)
> "kalin mintchev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> unless "at device 31.2 on pci0" points to some RAID evidence - which i
>> think it's false - than i read this as the ad6 disk sits there unused.
>> am i right?!
>
> FWIW, you can use gstat (as root) to see
On Thu, 24 May 2007 19:11:27 -0400 (EDT)
"kalin mintchev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> unless "at device 31.2 on pci0" points to some RAID evidence - which i
> think it's false - than i read this as the ad6 disk sits there unused.
> am i right?!
FWIW, you can use gstat (as root) to see if a certa
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 07:11:27PM -0400, kalin mintchev wrote:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:30:06AM -0400, kalin mintchev wrote:
> >>
> >> so nobody on this list knows anything about raid?
> >> wrong list?
> >>
> >> > hi all..
> >> >
> >> > i have a box in a remote hosting facility that claims
> On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:30:06AM -0400, kalin mintchev wrote:
>>
>> so nobody on this list knows anything about raid?
>> wrong list?
>>
>> > hi all..
>> >
>> > i have a box in a remote hosting facility that claims that the machine
>> has
>> > two discs raided in it but df and fstab show only on
On Thu, 24 May 2007, kalin mintchev wrote:
Also what type of RAID? If it's Hardware RAID _and_ it's using a 3ware
card,
doubt it. i don't see anything that ponts to that in the pciconf output..
you can install tw_cli from /usr/ports/sysutils. It's a nice
little utility and will show you
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:07:58AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 24/05/07, kalin mintchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >so nobody on this list knows anything about raid?
> >wrong list?
> >
> >> hi all..
> >>
> >> i have a box in a remote hosting facility that claims that the machine
>
On Thursday 24 May 2007 06:30:06 am kalin mintchev wrote:
> so nobody on this list knows anything about raid?
> wrong list?
>
> > hi all..
> >
> > i have a box in a remote hosting facility that claims that the machine
> > has two discs raided in it but df and fstab show only one disc with a
> > bun
On 24/05/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 24/05/07, kalin mintchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> please elaborate. do you mean that the raided disks will have another
> id/name rather than 'ad'?
Not knowing what hardware you have, I would still hazard
that a RAID device will
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:30:06AM -0400, kalin mintchev wrote:
>
> so nobody on this list knows anything about raid?
> wrong list?
>
> > hi all..
> >
> > i have a box in a remote hosting facility that claims that the machine has
> > two discs raided in it but df and fstab show only one disc with
On 24/05/07, Derek Ragona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 05:30 AM 5/24/2007, kalin mintchev wrote:
>so nobody on this list knows anything about raid?
>wrong list?
>
> > hi all..
> >
> > i have a box in a remote hosting facility that claims that the machine has
> > two discs raided in it but df an
On 24/05/07, kalin mintchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > i have a box in a remote hosting facility that claims that the machine
>> has
>> > two discs raided in it but df and fstab show only one disc with a
>> bunch of
>> > slices.
>> > under devices there is another name - ad6 - but it's
At 05:30 AM 5/24/2007, kalin mintchev wrote:
so nobody on this list knows anything about raid?
wrong list?
> hi all..
>
> i have a box in a remote hosting facility that claims that the machine has
> two discs raided in it but df and fstab show only one disc with a bunch of
> slices.
> under dev
> Also what type of RAID? If it's Hardware RAID _and_ it's using a 3ware
> card,
doubt it. i don't see anything that ponts to that in the pciconf output..
> you can install tw_cli from /usr/ports/sysutils. It's a nice
> little utility and will show you the status of your units/ports/drives
> a
>> >
>> > i have a box in a remote hosting facility that claims that the machine
>> has
>> > two discs raided in it but df and fstab show only one disc with a
>> bunch of
>> > slices.
>> > under devices there is another name - ad6 - but it's not mounted
>> anywhere.
>> > the one i see both in df an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/05/07, kalin mintchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
so nobody on this list knows anything about raid?
wrong list?
> hi all..
>
> i have a box in a remote hosting facility that claims that the
machine has
> two discs raided in it but df and fstab show only one disc
On 24/05/07, kalin mintchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
so nobody on this list knows anything about raid?
wrong list?
> hi all..
>
> i have a box in a remote hosting facility that claims that the machine has
> two discs raided in it but df and fstab show only one disc with a bunch of
> slices.
>
so nobody on this list knows anything about raid?
wrong list?
> hi all..
>
> i have a box in a remote hosting facility that claims that the machine has
> two discs raided in it but df and fstab show only one disc with a bunch of
> slices.
> under devices there is another name - ad6 - but it's not
27 matches
Mail list logo
