Re: problem mounting USB drive

2010-08-10 Thread Aiza
Adam Vande More wrote: On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Ott Köstner wrote: 2) After that... # ntfsfix /dev/da0s1 Mounting volume... OK Processing of $MFT and $MFTMirr completed successfully. NTFS volume version is 3.1. NTFS partition /dev/da0s1 was processed successfully. All ntfsfix does

Re: problem mounting USB drive

2010-08-10 Thread Adam Vande More
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Ott Köstner wrote: > 2) After that... > > # ntfsfix /dev/da0s1 > Mounting volume... OK > Processing of $MFT and $MFTMirr completed successfully. > NTFS volume version is 3.1. > NTFS partition /dev/da0s1 was processed successfully. > All ntfsfix does is mark it di

Re: problem mounting USB drive

2010-08-10 Thread Samuel Martín Moro
"or use the 'force' option" ntfsmount -o force, or something like that then, it would mount normally (without forcing) btw, I didn't check, is ntfsprogs' mkntfs (or whatever the name) working now? Samuel Martín Moro {EPITECH.} tek4 CamTrace S.A.S (+033) 1 41 38 37 60 1 Allée de la Venelle

Re: problem mounting USB drive

2010-08-10 Thread Ott Köstner
Adam Vande More wrote: On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Ott Köstner wrote: Adam Vande More wrote: On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Ott Köstner wrote: # ls -ld /mnt/BACKUP ls: /mnt/BACKUP: Argument list too long Some directories are not big at all. My question is, is i

Re: problem mounting USB drive

2010-08-10 Thread Adam Vande More
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Ott Köstner wrote: > Adam Vande More wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Ott Köstner wrote: >> >> >> >>> # df -H|grep da0 >>> /dev/da0s1 160G 26G134G16%/mnt >>> >>> ...but all commands result with an error like this... >>> >>> # l

Re: problem mounting USB drive

2010-08-10 Thread Ott Köstner
Adam Vande More wrote: On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Ott Köstner wrote: # df -H|grep da0 /dev/da0s1 160G 26G134G16%/mnt ...but all commands result with an error like this... # ls -l /mnt/BACKUP ls: /mnt/BACKUP: Argument list too long That generally means

Re: problem mounting USB drive

2010-08-10 Thread Adam Vande More
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Ott Köstner wrote: > Antonio Vieiro wrote: > >> >> The fact that the drive is working on Windows does not mean it's FAT32 >> formatted. It may as well be NTFS formatted ("man mount_ntfs"). >> >> Doublecheck you're running a FAT32 system: FreeBSD is saying you're

Re: problem mounting USB drive

2010-08-10 Thread Ott Köstner
Antonio Vieiro wrote: The fact that the drive is working on Windows does not mean it's FAT32 formatted. It may as well be NTFS formatted ("man mount_ntfs"). Doublecheck you're running a FAT32 system: FreeBSD is saying you're not. Thank You! Looks better now, but the volume is still unusable

Re: problem mounting USB drive

2010-08-10 Thread Antonio Vieiro
On 10/08/2010 17:32, Ott Köstner wrote: [...] In the /var/log/messages the following message appears: Aug 10 18:27:40 ott kernel: mountmsdosfs(): bad FAT32 filesystem The drive is OK and works fine with Windows. Also, USB flash thumb drives work fine, when used in the same manner with my FreeB