Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 6:02 PM -0800 11/17/03, K Anderson wrote:
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
Are all the messages from the same process? And is that
process really 'inetd'? If so, what kind of entries do
you have in /etc/inetd.conf?
Woa, thanks for the quick response.
Just a matter of l
At 6:02 PM -0800 11/17/03, K Anderson wrote:
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
Are all the messages from the same process? And is that
process really 'inetd'? If so, what kind of entries do
you have in /etc/inetd.conf?
Woa, thanks for the quick response.
Just a matter of luck... :-)
Yes, the process is
Bill Campbell wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 4:47 PM -0800 11/17/03, K Anderson wrote:
Hey there all.
For quite some time I've been noticing messages on the primary
console as well as the message log.
inetd[630]: printer/tcp: bind: Address already in use
I have cups
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 4:47 PM -0800 11/17/03, K Anderson wrote:
Hey there all.
For quite some time I've been noticing messages on the primary
console as well as the message log.
inetd[630]: printer/tcp: bind: Address already in use
I have cups installed and happen to notice something
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>At 4:47 PM -0800 11/17/03, K Anderson wrote:
>>Hey there all.
>>
>>For quite some time I've been noticing messages on the primary
>>console as well as the message log.
>>
>> inetd[630]: printer/tcp: bind: Address already in use
>>
>>I have cups inst
At 4:47 PM -0800 11/17/03, K Anderson wrote:
Hey there all.
For quite some time I've been noticing messages on the primary
console as well as the message log.
inetd[630]: printer/tcp: bind: Address already in use
I have cups installed and happen to notice something in the
/usr/local/etc/rc.d
