Kirk Strauser wrote:
> On Saturday 25 December 2004 12:29, Jay O'Brien wrote:
>
>
>>But it is there, so it will stay.
>
>
> I doesn't *have* to stay, though:
>
> 1) Add 'WITHOUT_X11="YES"' to /etc/make.conf .
> 2) Use You can use 'pkg_info -rR xorg-[whatever]' to see which ports depend
> on
On Saturday 25 December 2004 12:29, Jay O'Brien wrote:
> But it is there, so it will stay.
I doesn't *have* to stay, though:
1) Add 'WITHOUT_X11="YES"' to /etc/make.conf .
2) Use You can use 'pkg_info -rR xorg-[whatever]' to see which ports depend
on a each of the X.org ports.
For each "depend
On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 11:58:03 -0800, Jay O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
I ran portupgrade -a -N -vu -rR, and it tried several times
You dont need the -N switch, it's only used for new port installations,
not
upgrades. Using it carelessly is a bit dangerous, you may find youself
install
RW wrote:
> On Friday 24 December 2004 21:54, Jay O'Brien wrote:
>
>>Running FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2 #0, i386 P3-667MHz, 512MB RAM.
>>
>>This is my first experience using portupgrade.
>>
>>I ran cvsup successfully for ports-all. I ran pkg_version -v.
>>It showed a total of 28 ports, 20 needed updat
On Friday 24 December 2004 21:54, Jay O'Brien wrote:
> Running FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2 #0, i386 P3-667MHz, 512MB RAM.
>
> This is my first experience using portupgrade.
>
> I ran cvsup successfully for ports-all. I ran pkg_version -v.
> It showed a total of 28 ports, 20 needed updating. Of those,
>
Frank Staals wrote:
> Jay O'Brien wrote:
>
>
>>albi wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Jay O'Brien wrote:
>>>
>>>hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
Running FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2 #0, i386 P3-667MHz, 512MB RAM.
>>>
>>>- cut for brevity
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
-I didn't install xorg. Wh
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2004 at 01:54:04PM -0800, Jay O'Brien wrote:
>
>
>>I ran portupgrade -a -N -vu -rR, and it tried several times
>>to fetch X11R6.8.1-src1.tar.gz, each time taking over an hour,
>>and when the file failed, it failed showing a checksum mismatch.
>
>
>>I t
Jay O'Brien wrote:
albi wrote:
Jay O'Brien wrote:
hi,
Running FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2 #0, i386 P3-667MHz, 512MB RAM.
- cut for brevity
-I didn't install xorg. Why are the 16 xorg ports present?
a fresh FreeBSD 5.3 has xorg by default instead of XFree86
So
albi wrote:
> Jay O'Brien wrote:
>
> hi,
>
>
>>Running FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2 #0, i386 P3-667MHz, 512MB RAM.
>
> - cut for brevity
>
>>-I didn't install xorg. Why are the 16 xorg ports present?
>
>
> a fresh FreeBSD 5.3 has xorg by default instead of XFree86
>
So X is install
On Fri, Dec 24, 2004 at 01:54:04PM -0800, Jay O'Brien wrote:
> I ran portupgrade -a -N -vu -rR, and it tried several times
> to fetch X11R6.8.1-src1.tar.gz, each time taking over an hour,
> and when the file failed, it failed showing a checksum mismatch.
> I tried it again today, and it was ab
Jay O'Brien wrote:
hi,
Running FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2 #0, i386 P3-667MHz, 512MB RAM.
- cut for brevity
-I didn't install xorg. Why are the 16 xorg ports present?
a fresh FreeBSD 5.3 has xorg by default instead of XFree86
___
freebsd-questions
11 matches
Mail list logo