On 10/31/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/31/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/31/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 10/30/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 10/31/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > On 1
On 10/31/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/30/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/31/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 10/29/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 10/29/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> >
On 10/30/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/31/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/29/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 10/29/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Needless to say, this process wasn't much fun. What can I do
On 10/31/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/29/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/29/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Needless to say, this process wasn't much fun. What can I do to keep
> > > this from happening again? What can/can't I
On 10/29/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/29/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Needless to say, this process wasn't much fun. What can I do to keep
> > this from happening again? What can/can't I safely include in cron to
> > automate database and index mainten
I ended up deinstalling that apache installation (which I was not keen
on doing), and installing the apache20 port (which was the same
version (2.0.55) as the apache2 port ), and, thankfully, it's
working fine. I'm also now able to run both 'pkgdb -F'and 'portsdb
-Uu' without ANY errors (except f
On Oct 28, 2005, at 7:31 PM, John DeStefano wrote:
cd /usr/ports/www/apache20 && make deinstall && make clean && make
reinstall
See what happens.
Talk about strange:
# cd /usr/ports/www/apache20/
# make deinstall
===> Deinstalling for www/apache20
===> apache not installed, skipping
# m
On 10/29/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Needless to say, this process wasn't much fun. What can I do to keep
> this from happening again? What can/can't I safely include in cron to
> automate database and index maintenance?
>
cvsup or portsnap, then portsdb -uUF. Work under
an
On 10/28/05, Michael C. Shultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 28 October 2005 17:31, John DeStefano wrote:
> > On 10/28/05, Eric F Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > status report finished
> > > > ==
> > > > ==
> > >
On Friday 28 October 2005 19:51, John DeStefano wrote:
> On 10/28/05, Michael C. Shultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday 28 October 2005 17:31, John DeStefano wrote:
> > > On 10/28/05, Eric F Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > status report finished
> > > > > ===
On Friday 28 October 2005 17:31, John DeStefano wrote:
> On 10/28/05, Eric F Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > status report finished
> > > ==
> > > ==
> > > percentDone-=>0 = 100 - ( 100 * ( QTY_outOfDatePortsDb-=>1 /
> > > T
On 10/28/05, Eric F Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > status report finished
> > ==
> > ==
> > percentDone-=>0 = 100 - ( 100 * ( QTY_outOfDatePortsDb-=>1 /
> > TOTAL_outOfDatePortsDb-=>1 ) )
> > upgrade 0.3.0_0 info: ignoring ap
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: portupgrade stale dependencies
Date: Friday 28 October 2005 15:02
From: "Michael C. Shultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Friday 28 October 2005 13:29, John DeStefano wrote:
> On 10
status report finished
==
==
percentDone-=>0 = 100 - ( 100 * ( QTY_outOfDatePortsDb-=>1 /
TOTAL_outOfDatePortsDb-=>1 ) )
upgrade 0.3.0_0 info: ignoring apache-2.0.48, reason: failed during
(2) make
On 10/28/05, Michael C. Shultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 28 October 2005 05:53, John DeStefano wrote:
> > On 10/27/05, Michael C. Shultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thursday 27 October 2005 18:49, Eric F Crist wrote:
> > > > On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote:
>
On 10/27/05, Michael C. Shultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 27 October 2005 18:49, Eric F Crist wrote:
> > On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote:
> > > On 10/27/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> On 10/27/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>> Aft
On Friday 28 October 2005 05:53, John DeStefano wrote:
> On 10/27/05, Michael C. Shultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 27 October 2005 18:49, Eric F Crist wrote:
> > > On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote:
> > > > On 10/27/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >> O
On Friday 28 October 2005 00:25, Andrew P. wrote:
> On 10/28/05, Michael C. Shultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 27 October 2005 18:49, Eric F Crist wrote:
> > > On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote:
> > > > On 10/27/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >> On 10/
On 10/28/05, Michael C. Shultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 27 October 2005 18:49, Eric F Crist wrote:
> > On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote:
> > > On 10/27/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> On 10/27/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>> Aft
On Thursday 27 October 2005 18:49, Eric F Crist wrote:
> On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote:
> > On 10/27/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 10/27/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> After clearing out the ports, updating ports (with portsnap) and
> >>>
On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/27/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/27/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After clearing out the ports, updating ports (with portsnap) and
source, and rebuilding the system and kernel... it seemed the
ultima
On 10/27/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/27/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > After clearing out the ports, updating ports (with portsnap) and
> > source, and rebuilding the system and kernel... it seemed the ultimate
> > problem was actually a dependency of the
On 10/27/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<...snip...>
>
> After clearing out the ports, updating ports (with portsnap) and
> source, and rebuilding the system and kernel... it seemed the ultimate
> problem was actually a dependency of the package to apache1.3. After I
> ran 'pkgdb -
On 10/18/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/15/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/16/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'm trying to use portupgrade to update my installed ports. I ran into
> > > trouble with dependencies with ImageMagick and xor
On 10/15/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/16/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm trying to use portupgrade to update my installed ports. I ran into
> > trouble with dependencies with ImageMagick and xorg-libraries, and I then
> > followed the suggestion in UPDATING
On 10/16/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to use portupgrade to update my installed ports. I ran into
> trouble with dependencies with ImageMagick and xorg-libraries, and I then
> followed the suggestion in UPDATING to delete XFree86 the imake-4 packages,
> and install the
26 matches
Mail list logo