On Thursday 09 July 2009 01:44:14 Jonathan Chen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 10:20:41PM +0100, RW wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:00:28 +1200
> >
> > Jonathan Chen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:50:17PM +0200, dan wrote:
> > > > THat's the point !
> > > >
> > > > isnt that -R implied
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 10:20:41PM +0100, RW wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:00:28 +1200
> Jonathan Chen wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:50:17PM +0200, dan wrote:
> > > THat's the point !
> > >
> > > isnt that -R implied by -N ?
> > >
> > > From the portupgrade man page
> > >
> > >
>
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:00:28 +1200
Jonathan Chen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:50:17PM +0200, dan wrote:
> > THat's the point !
> >
> > isnt that -R implied by -N ?
> >
> > From the portupgrade man page
> >
> >
> > [...]
> > -N
> > --new
> > Install a new port/package when a specif
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:50:17PM +0200, dan wrote:
> THat's the point !
>
> isnt that -R implied by -N ?
>
> From the portupgrade man page
>
>
> [...]
> -N
> --new
> Install a new port/package when a specified package is not installed.
> Prior
> to the installation a new port/p
THat's the point !
isnt that -R implied by -N ?
From the portupgrade man page
[...]
-N
--new
Install a new port/package when a specified package is not installed.
Prior
to the installation a new port/package, all the required packages are
upgraded.
If this opt
Hi,
The missing switch is the -R parameter of portupdate.
I.e. portupgrade -vnyNbR
Regards,
Ivailo Tanusheff
Deputy Head of IT Department
ProCredit Bank (Bulgaria) AD
dan
Sent by: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
08.07.2009 14:05
Please respond to
mesli...@yahoo.fr
To
freebsd-questio
On Tue, 7 April 2009 16:17:40 Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2009, at 8:59 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:55 PM, new_guy wrote:
> >> Is there a way to use portupgrade without all the stopping for
> >> config questions?
> >
> > You could add:
> >
> > BATCH=yes
> >
> > to
On Apr 6, 2009, at 8:59 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:55 PM, new_guy wrote:
Is there a way to use portupgrade without all the stopping for config
questions?
You could add:
BATCH=yes
to /etc/make.conf.
Or use the --batch command line option to portupgrade.
Or use t
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, new_guy wrote:
Silly question... when I use portupgrade on gnome installs, it interrupts
itself a lot to prompt for config options. I normally take all the defaults.
Is there a way to use portupgrade without all the stopping for config
questions? I'd like to leave my laptop a
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:55 PM, new_guy wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Silly question... when I use portupgrade on gnome installs, it interrupts
> itself a lot to prompt for config options. I normally take all the defaults.
> Is there a way to use portupgrade without all the stopping for config
> questions? I
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 03:24:10PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
>
> What do we do about packages that "fail" to update?
>
> This is my first time running portupgrade, and am unsure what to think about
> the ones where there is a "configure error" or "uknown build error" or
> "install error"
>
> FYI -
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:13:19 -0800 (PST)
gahn wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I was doing "portupgrade -fa -y" remotely via ssh (desktop xp), it
> worked fine and was still running almost two days (7.1). But suddenly
> i lost power on my xp station, lost ssh connection to the freebsd7.1
> box.
>
> What sh
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Glen Barber writes:
>
>> > Never used screen. Does that mean it is too late and I have to
>> > start over again?
>>
>> Note that I said: "You *should* just be able to restart the
>> portupgrade, and (ideally) it should start where it lef
Glen Barber writes:
> > Never used screen. Does that mean it is too late and I have to
> > start over again?
>
> Note that I said: "You *should* just be able to restart the
> portupgrade, and (ideally) it should start where it left off."
Not according to my understanding of portu
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:29 PM, gahn wrote:
> Thanks Glen:
>
> So use "portupgrade -fa -y" again or a bit different knobs?
>
>
Please stop top-posting.
Continue with the command you had already used.
--
Glen Barber
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Thanks Glen:
So use "portupgrade -fa -y" again or a bit different knobs?
--- On Tue, 2/24/09, Glen Barber wrote:
> From: Glen Barber
> Subject: Re: portupgrade question
> To: ipfr...@yahoo.com
> Cc: "freebsd general questions"
> Date: Tuesday, February
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:25 PM, gahn wrote:
> Thanks Glen:
>
> Never used screen. Does that mean it is too late and I have to start over
> again?
>
Note that I said: "You *should* just be able to restart
the portupgrade, and (ideally) it should start where it left off."
Otherwise, yes, it is
Thanks Glen:
Never used screen. Does that mean it is too late and I have to start over again?
--- On Tue, 2/24/09, Glen Barber wrote:
> From: Glen Barber
> Subject: Re: portupgrade question
> To: ipfr...@yahoo.com
> Cc: "freebsd general questions"
> Date: Tuesday
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:13 PM, gahn wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I was doing "portupgrade -fa -y" remotely via ssh (desktop xp), it worked
> fine and was still running almost two days (7.1). But suddenly i lost power
> on my xp station, lost ssh connection to the freebsd7.1 box.
>
> What shall i do so
> Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 12:35:03 +1000
> From: Fraser Tweedale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> AN wrote:
> > I installed openoffice 2.4.0 from ports with:
> > make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA install clean
> >
> > Now, when I do a portupgrade it tries to install mozilla:
> >
> > To bu
* AN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-13-2008]:
> How do I portupgrade openoffice and get it to use the -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA
> option from the command line? What is the correct way to do this?
Look for references to MAKE_ARGS in $PREFIX/etc/pkgtools.conf.
--
Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
On Tue, 13 May 2008 17:54:15 -0500, AN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I installed openoffice 2.4.0 from ports with:
make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA install clean
Now, when I do a portupgrade it tries to install mozilla:
To build OOo, you should have a lot
of free diskspace (~ 11GB) and memory (~ 2GB).
If y
AN wrote:
I installed openoffice 2.4.0 from ports with:
make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA install clean
Now, when I do a portupgrade it tries to install mozilla:
To build OOo, you should have a lot
of free diskspace (~ 11GB) and memory (~ 2GB).
If you want SDK and/or solver, please type make sdk and/or ma
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:05:02PM +, AN wrote:
> I installed openoffice 2.4.0 from ports with:
> make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA install clean
>
> Now, when I do a portupgrade it tries to install mozilla:
>
> To build OOo, you should have a lot
> of free diskspace (~ 11GB) and memory (~ 2GB).
> If yo
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 13:18:11 +0100
Christopher Key <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I've gone for a portconf based solution for now, although, when I get
> the chance, I'll try to test how portupgrade behaves wrt
> dependencies.
Please don't forget to try switching to portupgrade-devel in that
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 07:56:52 -0400
Robert Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nikola Lecic wrote:
>
> >> So the /etc/make.conf option is better.
> >
> > It is definitively the most universal and IMHO it should appear
> > in the Handbook.
>
> I try to avoid setting things in make.conf th
Nikola Lecic wrote:
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:36:53 +0400 (GST)
Rakhesh Sasidharan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nikola Lecic wrote:
Yes, options are not saved that way and Vim's default is with X11.
Please make sure that the following lines exist in
your /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf:
MAK
Nikola Lecic wrote:
>> So the /etc/make.conf option is better.
>
> It is definitively the most universal and IMHO it should appear
> in the Handbook.
I try to avoid setting things in make.conf that do not need to
be set there. Why? Because - as far as I know - they will apply to
_eve
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:36:53 +0400 (GST)
Rakhesh Sasidharan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nikola Lecic wrote:
>
> > Yes, options are not saved that way and Vim's default is with X11.
> > Please make sure that the following lines exist in
> > your /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf:
> >
> > MAKE_ARGS =
Nikola Lecic wrote:
Yes, options are not saved that way and Vim's default is with X11.
Please make sure that the following lines exist in
your /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf:
MAKE_ARGS = {
'editors/vim' => 'NO_GUI=yes',
[... options for other ports ...]
}
Next time portupgrade
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 12:40:30AM +0200, Nikola Lecic wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 21:12:40 +0100
> Christopher Key <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've just CVSupped my ports collection and run 'portupgrade -ra'.
>
> Hello Christopher,
>
> 'portupgrade -a' is just enough, '-r'
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 21:12:40 +0100
Christopher Key <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've just CVSupped my ports collection and run 'portupgrade -ra'.
Hello Christopher,
'portupgrade -a' is just enough, '-r' means nothing here.
> One of the ports that was updated was vim, which had origi
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 17:12 +0100, RW wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:57:05 -0700
> "Michael S. Eubanks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Don't use the ``p'' option. Use something like ``-afrRPv''.
> >
>
> -Rr doesn't actually do anything in combination with -a
Make sense. I've been using th
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:57:05 -0700
"Michael S. Eubanks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't use the ``p'' option. Use something like ``-afrRPv''.
>
-Rr doesn't actually do anything in combination with -a
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 12:29 -0500, Jonathan Horne wrote:
> ive been using 'portupgrade -apP' on my systems lately (since i keep a
> central
> repository of packages i build for my systems; a good bulk of them are used
> across most/all of them).
>
> in situations where new packages are built
On Saturday October 21, 2006 at 08:29:05 (PM) Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
> Hi people,
>I just did the "portupgrade -rf pkg-config\*" to upgrade the apps, but i
> think some of the upgrades went wrong so there are a whole bunch ports
> skipped. I noticed glib20 has some compilation error, and probab
On 7/20/06, Nagy László <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After running
portupgrade -aP
I get this:
** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed)
! textproc/linux-expat (linux-expat-1.95.7_1) (install error)
* x11-fonts/linux-fontconfig (linux-fontconfig-2.2.3_4)
* x
D]>
Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List
Sent: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 21:29:10 -0400
Subject: Re: portupgrade question (solved)
> I did define the to environment variables. For some reason, wget
> works just fine on the same machine.
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:29:10PM -0400, Michael S wrote:
> I did define the to environment variables. For some reason, wget works
> just fine on the same machine.
Different defaults.
> Thanks a lot.
np.
Kris
pgpbQ76wJJ4Xj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I did define the to environment variables. For some reason, wget works
just fine on the same machine.
Thanks a lot.
On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 04:35:12PM -0400, Michael S wrote:
> wget works like magic. I used the defaults. fetch I guess is the
>
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 04:35:12PM -0400, Michael S wrote:
> wget works like magic. I used the defaults. fetch I guess is the
> FreeBSD default for "fetching" files from the web. It was having
> problems fetching files from FTP sites.
> No idea what the problem is.
Try setting FTP_PASSIVE_MODE. T
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006, Michael S wrote:
> Good day everyone!
>
> I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
> doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it
> works great. I updated the pkgtools.conf to reflect that, however
> portupgrade insists on using
wget works like magic. I used the defaults. fetch I guess is the
FreeBSD default for "fetching" files from the web. It was having
problems fetching files from FTP sites.
No idea what the problem is.
On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:38:36AM -0400, Mic
I had them set, but in lower case - $http_proxy and $ftp_proxy. wget
doesn't have a problem with that.
More precisely (applogies for not specifying in the first place) the
problem was retrieving files from FTP hosts. HTTP sites were fine.
On 6/7/06, Toni Schmidbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At
At Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:38:36 -0400,
Michael S wrote:
> I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
> doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it
> works great. I updated the pkgtools.conf to reflect that, however
> portupgrade insists on using fetch for
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:38:36AM -0400, Michael S wrote:
> Good day everyone!
>
> I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
> doesn't appear to cope with it very well.
What did you try? fetch works fine with proxies for the rest of us :)
Kris
pgpQqWxSTgnVY.pgp
Des
Thanks, I will definitely try it out.
On 6/7/06, Andrey Slusar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:38:36 -0400, Michael S wrote:
> I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
> doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it
> works great. I
Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:38:36 -0400, Michael S wrote:
> I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
> doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it
> works great. I updated the pkgtools.conf to reflect that, however
> portupgrade insists on using fetch for s
On Monday 29 March 2004 12:03 pm, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
> I recently ran a portupgrade on one of our servers. The following
> error and exchange came up:
>
> server# pkgdb -F
> ---> Checking the package registry database
> Stale dependency: portupgrade-20040325_1 -> openssl-0.9.7d
> (security/o
49 matches
Mail list logo
