Re: portupgrade -arR fails -> port/pkg-system no longer usable

2004-03-24 Thread Ewald Jenisch
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 04:05:01PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Have had the same problem. Easiest solution is to cd to > /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade and make deinstall clean install > > Once that completes all is well again. > Hi Jon, Thanks much for the hint! It absolutely did the t

Re: portupgrade -arR fails -> port/pkg-system no longer usable

2004-03-22 Thread Kent Stewart
On Monday 22 March 2004 07:31 am, Ewald Jenisch wrote: > Hi, > > Doing a "portupgrade -arR" rendered my system (esp. the parts that > refer to ports/packages) more or less unusable. > > Here's what I did: > > System is running 4.9 > cvsup -g -L 2 ports-supfile > pkgdb -F > portsdb -Uu > cd /usr/por

Re: portupgrade -arR fails -> port/pkg-system no longer usable

2004-03-22 Thread Michael W. Oliver
On 2004-03-22T16:31:23+0100, Ewald Jenisch wrote: > So I tried > # pkgdb -F > /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:35:in `require': No such file to load -- pkgtools (LoadError) > from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:35 [snip] I believe that this is related to the bump of ruby from 1.6 to 1.8, but I could be wron

Re: portupgrade -arR fails -> port/pkg-system no longer usable

2004-03-22 Thread jon . mercer
Have had the same problem. Easiest solution is to cd to /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade and make deinstall clean install Once that completes all is well again. Jon Mercer http://www.achean.com > > Hi, > > Doing a "portupgrade -arR" rendered my system (esp. the parts that > refer to ports/package

Re: portupgrade -arR

2003-11-12 Thread Drew Tomlinson
- Original Message - From: "Jan Grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 2:37 AM > On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, William O'Higgins wrote: > > > Quite foolishly, I ran this command without thinking it through: > > > > portupgrade -arR > > > > It's been running for 15 hours or

Re: portupgrade -arR

2003-11-12 Thread Jan Grant
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, William O'Higgins wrote: > Quite foolishly, I ran this command without thinking it through: > > portupgrade -arR > > It's been running for 15 hours or so now, and I'm wondering how much > longer it is likely to take? I realize that "that depends" Well, "that depends"; many

Re: portupgrade -arR

2003-11-11 Thread Alex de Kruijff
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 06:24:31PM -0600, Chris wrote: > On Tuesday 11 November 2003 01:39 pm, Bjarne Wichmann Petersen wrote: > > On Tuesday 11 November 2003 18:33, William O'Higgins wrote: > > > Quite foolishly, I ran this command without thinking it through: > > > > > > portupgrade -arR > > > >

Re: portupgrade -arR

2003-11-11 Thread Chris
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 01:39 pm, Bjarne Wichmann Petersen wrote: > On Tuesday 11 November 2003 18:33, William O'Higgins wrote: > > Quite foolishly, I ran this command without thinking it through: > > > > portupgrade -arR > > Try the -n switch (ie. portupgrade -narR), this will show which ports

Re: portupgrade -arR

2003-11-11 Thread Bjarne Wichmann Petersen
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 18:33, William O'Higgins wrote: > Quite foolishly, I ran this command without thinking it through: > > portupgrade -arR Try the -n switch (ie. portupgrade -narR), this will show which ports will be upgraded without doing so. Bjarne ___

Re: portupgrade -arR

2003-11-11 Thread Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.
William O'Higgins wrote: Quite foolishly, I ran this command without thinking it through: portupgrade -arR It's been running for 15 hours or so now, and I'm wondering how much longer it is likely to take? I realize that "that depends" , but I've love some anecdotal hints if anyone's got some.