I looked at pkgtools.conf, and I don't see a way to do what I want there.
My goal here is to make it *easy* for somebody to update the installed
ports on a machine.
Even if we could use MAKE_ARGS in pkgtools.conf to try and do this that
does not solve the problem I am seeing.
(There is a bigger
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 09:41:04PM -0600, Chris wrote:
Neither -x nor HOLD_PKGS is what I want.
Er..the thread started with a question from a user who *knows about -P
and uses it*, but doesn't want portupgrade to fetch packages in a
specific situation.
Kris
Again, from the m
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 07:38:10PM -0800, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> I think a fair number of people would like to see it.
>
> It would make it Lots Easier for people to upgrade their systems.
>
> There are packages where it makes lots of sense to use the prebuilt ones.
>
> Now that I think the only
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 09:41:04PM -0600, Chris wrote:
> >Neither -x nor HOLD_PKGS is what I want.
> >>Er..the thread started with a question from a user who *knows about -P
> >>and uses it*, but doesn't want portupgrade to fetch packages in a
> >>specific situation.
> >>
> >>Kris
> >
> >
> >
Chris wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 09:22:04PM -0600, Chris wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 06:53:09PM -0800, Harlan Stenn wrote:
Neither -x nor HOLD_PKGS is what I want.
I *want* to upgrade the software, I just do not want to FETCH prebuilt
packages for a
I think a fair number of people would like to see it.
It would make it Lots Easier for people to upgrade their systems.
There are packages where it makes lots of sense to use the prebuilt ones.
Now that I think the only feature I want is for it to "don't fetch if
there is a Makefile.local" I'll
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 09:22:04PM -0600, Chris wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 06:53:09PM -0800, Harlan Stenn wrote:
Neither -x nor HOLD_PKGS is what I want.
I *want* to upgrade the software, I just do not want to FETCH prebuilt
packages for any package th
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 09:22:04PM -0600, Chris wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 06:53:09PM -0800, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> >
> >>Neither -x nor HOLD_PKGS is what I want.
> >>
> >>I *want* to upgrade the software, I just do not want to FETCH prebuilt
> >>packages for any packag
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 06:53:09PM -0800, Harlan Stenn wrote:
Neither -x nor HOLD_PKGS is what I want.
I *want* to upgrade the software, I just do not want to FETCH prebuilt
packages for any package that has a Makefile.local file in the tree, as
a Makefile.local file means I wa
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 06:53:09PM -0800, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> Neither -x nor HOLD_PKGS is what I want.
>
> I *want* to upgrade the software, I just do not want to FETCH prebuilt
> packages for any package that has a Makefile.local file in the tree, as
> a Makefile.local file means I want to buil
Neither -x nor HOLD_PKGS is what I want.
I *want* to upgrade the software, I just do not want to FETCH prebuilt
packages for any package that has a Makefile.local file in the tree, as
a Makefile.local file means I want to build that package with local changes.
H
--
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 01:36:1
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 01:36:12PM -0800, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> Yes, but that means I have to remember to build and package the ports
> first, before I do anything else, and that implies I have to handle any
> changed prerequisite packages as well.
I thought that's what you were asking for.
> If
Yes, but that means I have to remember to build and package the ports
first, before I do anything else, and that implies I have to handle any
changed prerequisite packages as well.
If a way can be found to say "Do not fetch these packages" then this will
become a much easier process.
H
--
>> Is t
On Sunday 26 December 2004 03:04 am, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> I have a couple of ports where I am using a Makefile.local to
> provide some customizations for the local environment (I think
> they are for postfix+SASL, and apache2+the experimental modules,
> but I could be mistaken) where "stock" prebu
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 01:04:51AM -0800, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> Is there a way to tell portupgrade that it should not *fetch* prebuilt ports
> for these two packages? If the packages are already there I'm fine having
> them installed (as it means they were built using the Makefile.local values
>
On Sunday 26 December 2004 09:04, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> I have a couple of ports where I am using a Makefile.local to provide some
> customizations for the local environment (I think they are for
> postfix+SASL, and apache2+the experimental modules, but I could be
> mistaken) where "stock" prebuilt
16 matches
Mail list logo
