Re: {Spam?} Re: {Spam?} Re: patches and uname -a

2006-01-12 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Ceri Davies wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:04:07PM +0100, Roberto Nunnari wrote: I checked the patches (cpio.patch ee.patch texindex5x.patch) and none of them tries to change src/sys/conf/newvers.sh nor src/UPDATING There is an ipfw one as well. Cheers, Ceri Thank you Ceri, but I bel

Re: {Spam?} Re: patches and uname -a

2006-01-12 Thread Ceri Davies
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:04:07PM +0100, Roberto Nunnari wrote: > > I checked the patches (cpio.patch ee.patch texindex5x.patch) and none > of them tries to change src/sys/conf/newvers.sh nor src/UPDATING There is an ipfw one as well. Cheers, Ceri -- Only two things are infinite, the universe

Re: {Spam?} Re: patches and uname -a

2006-01-12 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Ceri Davies wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:26:22PM +0100, Roberto Nunnari wrote: Ceri Davies wrote: On 12 Jan 2006, at 12:32, Roberto Nunnari wrote: Hello. Please also answer to my mailbox as I'm not on the list. After upgrading by sources and build world, uname correctly reports the

Re: {Spam?} Re: patches and uname -a

2006-01-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/12/06, Roberto Nunnari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ceri Davies wrote: > > > That would work, but if you don't already have that string then there is > > a possibility that you don't have all the patches, so please only change > > it if you are %100 sure that you have. I cannot stress that

Re: {Spam?} Re: patches and uname -a

2006-01-12 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Ceri Davies wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:26:22PM +0100, Roberto Nunnari wrote: Ceri Davies wrote: On 12 Jan 2006, at 12:32, Roberto Nunnari wrote: Hello. Please also answer to my mailbox as I'm not on the list. After upgrading by sources and build world, uname correctly reports the

Re: patches and uname -a

2006-01-12 Thread Ceri Davies
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:26:22PM +0100, Roberto Nunnari wrote: > > Ceri Davies wrote: > > > >On 12 Jan 2006, at 12:32, Roberto Nunnari wrote: > > > >>Hello. > >> > >>Please also answer to my mailbox as I'm not on the list. > >> > >>After upgrading by sources and build world, uname correctly > >>

Re: patches and uname -a

2006-01-12 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Thank you Ceri and Jaap for your time. Ceri, edit src/sys/conf/newvers.sh and replace BRANCH="RELEASE-p23" with BRANCH="RELEASE-p24" would be enough?? Best regards. Ceri Davies wrote: On 12 Jan 2006, at 12:32, Roberto Nunnari wrote: Hello. Please also answer to my mailbox as I'm not on

Re: patches and uname -a

2006-01-12 Thread Ceri Davies
On 12 Jan 2006, at 12:32, Roberto Nunnari wrote: Hello. Please also answer to my mailbox as I'm not on the list. After upgrading by sources and build world, uname correctly reports the current version of the system Today for the first time I applied all the relevant patches instead and all w

Re: patches and uname -a

2006-01-12 Thread Jaap Boender
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Roberto Nunnari wrote: Does anybody know how can you make uname report the real version? What if you recompile the kernel after patching the system? Would that do the trick? As far as I know, uname gets the version information from the kernel. So yes, if you recompile the