On Friday 27 January 2006 14:03, Dimitar Vasilev wrote:
> 2006/1/26, Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Vincent Chen wrote:
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > > Why I have to restart ntpd to get connected? I don't have this problem
> >
> > with
> >
> > > release 4.7.
> >
> > I've seen this once and gotten the
2006/1/26, Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Vincent Chen wrote:
> [ ... ]
> > Why I have to restart ntpd to get connected? I don't have this problem
> with
> > release 4.7.
>
> I've seen this once and gotten the impression that ntpd had fired up
> before DNS
> was working, because the ntpd was
Vincent Chen wrote:
[ ... ]
> Why I have to restart ntpd to get connected? I don't have this problem with
> release 4.7.
I've seen this once and gotten the impression that ntpd had fired up before DNS
was working, because the ntpd was able to connect with local peers listed in the
/etc/hosts file.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 22 November 2004 03:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am having the same problem you mentioned here.
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-September/059279.
> html
>
> I was wondering if you ever found out the cause and/o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 24 September 2004 22:20, Dan Rue wrote:
> Heyo,
>
> I have a dual xeon machine on 5.3 beta 5 - and I am getting these ntpd
> messages in /var/log/messages non stop since I went up to 5.3:
>
> Sep 23 17:13:41 panther ntpd[467]: kernel time syn
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 06:36:31PM +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a few routers who don't have any 127.0.0.1, because their loopback has
> a a routable address so that I can use an IGP with them.
> Now, I guess that's the reason why ntpd is not working, and I was wondering
> how I c
