On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 01:56:24AM -0500, parv wrote:
> in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote Jez Hancock
> thusly...
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 04:48:11PM +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote:
>
> (something about increasing vi knowledge & moving to vim or emacs)
>
> > The major benefits of vi over vim
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote Jez Hancock
thusly...
>
> On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 04:48:11PM +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote:
(something about increasing vi knowledge & moving to vim or emacs)
> The major benefits of vi over vim are multiple buffers and the concept
On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 04:48:11PM +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote:
> Hello. I have been using the vi that comes with FreeBSD for more than a
> year. I now can manage to use lots of vi features except the tag mode which
> I don't know clear about its concept (perhaps because of my bad English).
>
> Now
"Zhang Weiwu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Should I advance to vim right now or emacs, or is it that I didn't dig
> into vi deep enough to release its full power? I wonder how many
> programmers are still using 4BSD vi (compare to enchanced vi's)? Maybe
> none? Maybe many?
The vi in FreeBSD's ba
Zhang Weiwu wrote:
[ ... ]
> Should I advance to vim right now or emacs, or is it that I didn't dig
> into vi deep enough to release its full power? I wonder how many
> programmers are still using 4BSD vi (compare to enchanced vi's)? Maybe
> none? Maybe many?
There are reasonable people who use