(sorry for top post)
Heh, looks like the Alton Brown style of debugging ;D (for anyone that follows
his twitter feed)
--
Devin
On Aug 8, 2013, at 7:34 AM, william benton wrote:
> I am trying to mount a memory stick at the command line. I seem to be able to
> mount and unmount it but i can't
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:34 AM, william benton wrote:
> I am trying to mount a memory stick at the command line. I seem to be able
> to mount and unmount it but i can't copy files into the stick. please see
> the attached image for the commands I used and the results. If you have any
> suggestion
On 26/11/2010 18:24, Jack Raats wrote:
> It looks like that there may be a memory leak of my swap space with one
> of the processes that is running.
> Big question: How can I determine which process is responsible.
>
> Any suggestions?
Look for a process with a really big SIZE in top(1) ?
Look f
On 08/23/10 11:50, n dhert wrote:
> After a reboot of my FreeBSD 8.0-p4 system
> a vmstat shows:
> Mon Aug 23 08:40:00 CEST 2010
> procs memory pagedisks faults cpu
> r b w avmfre flt re pi pofr sr da0 pa0 in sy cs us
> sy id
> 1
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 03:57:28 Olivier Nicole wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since I upgraded that machine from 6.x to 7.3 I am hitting a memory
> limit with xz when trying to build/upgrade several ports.
>
> The error message looks like:
>
> /usr/local/bin/xz: /usr/ports/distfiles//libpng-1.4.1.tar.xz: M
> I have the same problem when I want to upgrade libtool from 15 to 22,
> thanks.
True, libtool is among the "several ports" affected. For libtool I
uncompressed "by hand" and so make accepted to complete, but it
defeats the purpose of portupgrade if one has to do everything by
hand.
> > Since I
I have the same problem when I want to upgrade libtool from 15 to 22,
thanks.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Olivier Nicole <
olivier.nic...@cs.ait.ac.th> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since I upgraded that machine from 6.x to 7.3 I am hitting a memory
> limit with xz when trying to build/upgrade several p
I have the same problem when I want to upgrade libtool from 15 to 22,
thanks.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Olivier Nicole <
olivier.nic...@cs.ait.ac.th> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since I upgraded that machine from 6.x to 7.3 I am hitting a memory
> limit with xz when trying to build/upgrade several p
Matthew Seaman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/02/2010 17:10, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Actually, I was thinking more along the lines of mounting a .iso as a
cd9660 filesystem. Which won't muck up the underlying .iso, but only
because it's read-only. You could mou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/02/2010 17:10, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
>> Actually, I was thinking more along the lines of mounting a .iso as a
>> cd9660 filesystem. Which won't muck up the underlying .iso, but only
>> because it's read-only. You could mount a FFS image read
Matthew Seaman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/02/2010 15:39, RW wrote:
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:12:22 +
Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 11/02/2010 14:53, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
I would like to know if there is a mount command that allows to
creat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/02/2010 15:39, RW wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:12:22 +
> Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> On 11/02/2010 14:53, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
>>
>>> I would like to know if there is a mount command that allows to
>>> create a memory disk that can be i
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:12:22 +
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/02/2010 14:53, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
>
> > I would like to know if there is a mount command that allows to
> > create a memory disk that can be initialized from a file. What I
Matthew Seaman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/02/2010 14:53, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
I would like to know if there is a mount command that allows to create a
memory disk that can be initialized from a file. What I am looking for
is something like mount_mfs -F, b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/02/2010 14:53, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
> I would like to know if there is a mount command that allows to create a
> memory disk that can be initialized from a file. What I am looking for
> is something like mount_mfs -F, but that does not modif
Mel Flynn wrote:
On Tuesday 01 September 2009 23:19:23 Michael David Crawford wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Well, my problem is that if I add up all I *can* see in top or ps it
never gets near the by now 3G plus memory shown as "Active". Maybe one
gig is accounted for,
I'm not that familiar
On Tuesday 01 September 2009 23:19:23 Michael David Crawford wrote:
> Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> > Well, my problem is that if I add up all I *can* see in top or ps it
> > never gets near the by now 3G plus memory shown as "Active". Maybe one
> > gig is accounted for,
>
> I'm not that familiar wit
In response to Per olof Ljungmark :
> Bill Moran wrote:
> > In response to Per olof Ljungmark :
> >
> >> Dan Nelson wrote:
> >>> In the last episode (Sep 01), Bill Moran said:
> In response to Per olof Ljungmark :
> > What is a good way to find out how memory is used? Have a 6.4 box wher
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Per olof Ljungmark :
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Sep 01), Bill Moran said:
In response to Per olof Ljungmark :
What is a good way to find out how memory is used? Have a 6.4 box where
memory is used by something but I fail to see what is using it -
In response to Per olof Ljungmark :
> Dan Nelson wrote:
> > In the last episode (Sep 01), Bill Moran said:
> >> In response to Per olof Ljungmark :
> >>> What is a good way to find out how memory is used? Have a 6.4 box where
> >>> memory is used by something but I fail to see what is using it - t
In the last episode (Sep 02), Per olof Ljungmark said:
> Dan Nelson wrote:
> > In the last episode (Sep 01), Bill Moran said:
> >> In response to Per olof Ljungmark :
> >>> What is a good way to find out how memory is used? Have a 6.4 box
> >>> where memory is used by something but I fail to see wh
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Sep 01), Bill Moran said:
In response to Per olof Ljungmark :
What is a good way to find out how memory is used? Have a 6.4 box where
memory is used by something but I fail to see what is using it - tried
different switches to ps(1), tried the stat tools b
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Sep 01), Bill Moran said:
In response to Per olof Ljungmark :
What is a good way to find out how memory is used? Have a 6.4 box where
memory is used by something but I fail to see what is using it - tried
different switches to ps(1), tried the stat tools b
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Well, my problem is that if I add up all I *can* see in top or ps it
never gets near the by now 3G plus memory shown as "Active". Maybe one
gig is accounted for,
I'm not that familiar with FreeBSD yet, but the kernel uses memory which
might not be charged against any
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Per olof Ljungmark :
What is a good way to find out how memory is used? Have a 6.4 box where
memory is used by something but I fail to see what is using it - tried
different switches to ps(1), tried the stat tools but a big chunk of
memory does not show at all.
In the last episode (Sep 01), Bill Moran said:
> In response to Per olof Ljungmark :
> > What is a good way to find out how memory is used? Have a 6.4 box where
> > memory is used by something but I fail to see what is using it - tried
> > different switches to ps(1), tried the stat tools but a big
In response to Per olof Ljungmark :
>
> What is a good way to find out how memory is used? Have a 6.4 box where
> memory is used by something but I fail to see what is using it - tried
> different switches to ps(1), tried the stat tools but a big chunk of
> memory does not show at all.
>
> A p
On Feb 19, 2009 4:21pm, Ivan Voras wrote:
Your question is vague.
Sorry, it was not intentional. I wasn't too sure how to ask the question.
A 32-bit process can only access 4 GB of memory, but all processes also
have a bit of memory "reserved" for the kernel. On FreeBSD the
access
af300...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running into a per process memory limit at work (on Windoze though),
> but I'm wondering what's the limit per process in FreeBSD for 32 bit
> systems, ie i386? Is it 4gb or 2? From stuff I found on the Net, I'm
> guessing 4gb, but wanted to ask anyway. It se
2009/2/18 :
> Hi,
>
> I'm running into a per process memory limit at work (on Windoze though), but
> I'm wondering what's the limit per process in FreeBSD for 32 bit systems, ie
> i386? Is it 4gb or 2? From stuff I found on the Net, I'm guessing 4gb, but
> wanted to ask anyway. It seems to be an i
Grant Peel skrev:
Hi all,
Does anyone have scripts they may be willing to share the parses any FreeBSD
utility (top, w, etc) suitable for using the output to use mrtg to show memory
and disk usage?
-Grant
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
Le Fri, 2 Jan 2009 10:47:32 -0500,
"Grant Peel" a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone have scripts they may be willing to share the parses any
> FreeBSD utility (top, w, etc) suitable for using the output to use
> mrtg to show memory and disk usage?
Mrtg needs a script that returns four lines :
-
Grant Peel wrote:
Does anyone have scripts they may be willing to share the parses any
FreeBSD utility (top, w, etc) suitable for using the output to use
mrtg to show memory and disk usage?
net-mgmt/net-snmpd ? Or even, perhaps the base system's bsnmpd (although
I'm not sure if this has suppo
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:45:18 -0400, Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Polytropon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I always thought I needed to modify the
> > file system so fsck_ffs could do its job, now I think I rather would
> > modify fsck_ffs so it would skip these errors I can't see a
Polytropon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have another problem trying to recover my data that has been "destroyed"
> (in fact, it's just inaccessible because the inode at the entry od my
> home directory died).
>
> I'm using a dd image which reproduces the exact error of the defective
> hard disk
At 01:16 AM 8/5/2008, Shyamal Shukla wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to validate my understanding of how malloc works by means
of the below C program which tries to corrupt essential information
maintained by malloc for free() operation.
The program allocates 4, 12 byte blocks (internally 16 by
On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 09:58:40 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 11:46:06 +0530, "Shyamal Shukla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> However, this does not happen. Can someone please correct my
>> understanding and provide me with a reference to the working of
>> mal
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 11:46:06 +0530, "Shyamal Shukla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to validate my understanding of how malloc works by means
> of the below C program which tries to corrupt essential information
> maintained by malloc for free() operation.
>
> The program alloc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Rahul wrote:
| Hello,
|
| I'm new to FreeBSD and really attracted to it because of the
| performance and stability it provides. So I am looking to develop a
| high performance system that may need to process over 100K UDP
| messages per second and b
On Friday 08 February 2008 13:41:44 Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
> Lachlan Michael wrote:
> >>Real puzzler. I'm surprised not to have at least one process growing,
> >>though. Maybe it's not using much CPU and you're not spotting it.
> >
> >Following you advice, as far as I can tell, the mailman qrunner p
Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
>
>You are also getting a stack trace from python when it exits with the
>"out of memory" error. ktrace is just showing python printing the stuff
>- it may be that the error also ends up in a log file somewhere - don't
>know where mailman logs, sorry. From that stack trace
Lachlan Michael wrote:
Real puzzler. I'm surprised not to have at least one process growing,
though. Maybe it's not using much CPU and you're not spotting it.
Following you advice, as far as I can tell, the mailman qrunner process
/usr/local/bin/python2.5 /usr/local/mailman/bin/qrunner
>>>How big does the mailman process actually get? top will tell you.
>>>
>>Mailman values don't budge. None of the mailman processes go over about
>>8.5M, which is what they are during idle time.
>>
> Real puzzler. I'm surprised not to have at least one process growing,
> though. Maybe it's not
Lachlan Michael wrote:
How big does the mailman process actually get? top will tell you.
Mailman values don't budge. None of the mailman processes go over about
8.5M, which is what they are during idle time.
Real puzzler. I'm surprised not to have at least one process growing,
tho
> Lachlan Michael wrote:
>
>># su mailman
>>This account is currently not available.
>>
>>I'm not sure about the syntax but limits -U mailman doesn't seem to make
>>the user mailman, but just use the class default.
>>
>>
> su -m mailman
>
> will do what you want.
Ah, thanks! That's a much better w
Lachlan Michael wrote:
# su mailman
This account is currently not available.
I'm not sure about the syntax but limits -U mailman doesn't seem to make
the user mailman, but just use the class default.
su -m mailman
will do what you want. However, to be sure what your limits are, I
would s
> On Feb 5, 2008, at 7:17 PM, Lachlan Michael wrote:
>>> On Feb 5, 2008, at 4:17 AM, Lachlan Michael wrote:
>>>
I have a question about debugging a memory error on FreeBSD.
When a user sends an e-mail with an attachment above about 500kB to
a very
small mailing list (4 memb
On Feb 5, 2008, at 7:17 PM, Lachlan Michael wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008, at 4:17 AM, Lachlan Michael wrote:
I have a question about debugging a memory error on FreeBSD.
When a user sends an e-mail with an attachment above about 500kB to
a very
small mailing list (4 members), Mailman on my server
> On Feb 5, 2008, at 4:17 AM, Lachlan Michael wrote:
>
>> I have a question about debugging a memory error on FreeBSD.
>>
>> When a user sends an e-mail with an attachment above about 500kB to
>> a very
>> small mailing list (4 members), Mailman on my server aborts processing
>> with the error
>>
> Barry just answered on Mailman list saying that the memory fault may
> be in Python for that matter
Thanks for forwarding that mail.
If it's a python problem I'm probably in big trouble, but since I can't
find evidence of other having the same problem with such small attachments
(and as no
On Feb 5, 2008, at 4:17 AM, Lachlan Michael wrote:
I have a question about debugging a memory error on FreeBSD.
When a user sends an e-mail with an attachment above about 500kB to
a very
small mailing list (4 members), Mailman on my server aborts processing
with the error
MemoryError : ou
Hello,
Barry just answered on Mailman list saying that the memory fault may
be in Python for that matter
[quote]
> Now to just work out the root cause of the memory errors ...
It's important to remember that Python's email parsing code sucks the
entire message text into memory and keeps larg
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:56:25PM -0700, Modulok wrote:
> I get the feeling Conky 1.4.8 (the sysutil), or one of the libs it
> links against, has a memory leak. I do not have any hard evidence yet
> (like a patch to fix it), but the memory consumption slowly climbs to
> what appears to be excessiv
At 11:26 AM 11/7/2007, Mario Lobo wrote:
On Wednesday 07 November 2007, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 11:39:55AM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote:
> > Hello;
> >
> > I'm running a qmailrocks install + DNS server here. Hosting 14 domains
> > and their respective e-mail accounts. Everything
On Wednesday 07 November 2007, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 11:39:55AM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote:
> > Hello;
> >
> > I'm running a qmailrocks install + DNS server here. Hosting 14 domains
> > and their respective e-mail accounts. Everything seems to be working
> > fine.
> >
> > The
At 08:39 AM 11/7/2007, Mario Lobo wrote:
Hello;
I'm running a qmailrocks install + DNS server here. Hosting 14 domains and
their respective e-mail accounts. Everything seems to be working fine.
The machine is:
--
FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Mon Sep 10 14:15:1
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 11:39:55AM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote:
> Hello;
>
> I'm running a qmailrocks install + DNS server here. Hosting 14 domains and
> their respective e-mail accounts. Everything seems to be working fine.
>
> The machine is:
>
> --
> FreeB
At 01:46 01/11/2007, you wrote:
>> No, i don't want to sell anything to anyone. I'm already on hackers
>> list but has very low traffic (9 messages last 5 days) and this is
>> a question list no ? ;-) I think that in this list are FreeBSD
>> *gurus*/hacks too which could say a "try it" or a "are
On 2007-11-01 02:06, Eduardo Morras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 01:38 01/11/2007, you wrote:
>> This is a 'general' questions list, with a fairly high level of traffic.
>> Many FreeBSD committers and team affiliates are subscribed, but there
>> are still a lot of knowledgeable people who are re
On 10/31/07, Steve Bertrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I think that in this list are FreeBSD
> > *gurus*/hacks too which could say a "try it" or a "are you crazy?"
> > answer. If other developers thinks that they need my rfc i'll add my
> > code to FreeBSD.
>
> Agreed, so could it be added as
On 2007-11-01 01:00, Eduardo Morras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm already on hackers list but has very low traffic (9 messages last
> 5 days) and this is a question list no ? ;-)
This is a 'general' questions list, with a fairly high level of traffic.
Many FreeBSD committers and team affiliates
At 01:45 01/11/2007, you wrote:
And is it better than bzip?
Depends on your concept of better. It doesn't compress more, it
compress/decompress faster, it's designed for memory to memory compression.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
At 01:38 01/11/2007, you wrote:
This is a 'general' questions list, with a fairly high level of traffic.
Many FreeBSD committers and team affiliates are subscribed, but there
are still a lot of knowledgeable people who are respected team members,
but are *not* subcribed here.
Maybe in a more app
> And is it better than bzip?
This is in essence why I tried to lead this thread off of this list.
The OP stated nothing of being 'better'. On top of that, the OP was
referencing libraries, not applications.
The OP is trying to get his own code under the BSD license and that is
great.
Asking w
>> No, i don't want to sell anything to anyone. I'm already on hackers
>> list but has very low traffic (9 messages last 5 days) and this is
>> a question list no ? ;-) I think that in this list are FreeBSD
>> *gurus*/hacks too which could say a "try it" or a "are you crazy?"
>>
> Even though you
> I think that in this list are FreeBSD
> *gurus*/hacks too which could say a "try it" or a "are you crazy?"
> answer. If other developers thinks that they need my rfc i'll add my
> code to FreeBSD.
Agreed, so could it be added as a port, or can you license the code
with the BSD license and post a
On 11/1/07, Eduardo Morras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 00:38 01/11/2007, you wrote:
> >Ouch! ...you are not trying to sell anything are you? It may be in
> >your best interest if you proceed to the hackers list, to initiate
> >conversation in a way that explains how your code will benefit a
> >
At 00:38 01/11/2007, you wrote:
Ouch! ...you are not trying to sell anything are you? It may be in
your best interest if you proceed to the hackers list, to initiate
conversation in a way that explains how your code will benefit a
cause, not slam other people (and their work) that are already
est
> I have some free time and want to do an memory pool. The idea is
> to have a memory zone of N KB (or several MB) compressed in memory. I
> have fast compression algorithms now that can release under BSD
> licence that are faster than hd i/o, so it take less
> compress/decompress a memory zone th
- use the PAE extension (but see §8.4.1 in the FreeBSD Handbook)
.
the inefficient solution.
.
- switch to the amd64 architecture.
the right solution.___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-que
Hi all,
i am maybe new to BSD. I had setup my DELL server 2900 to run freeBSD
7.0server but i have seen a message that ignored my 4GB of my memory
in my
server. Can somebody tell me what is happening and give me some idea so
that i can maximize my memory usage. My total memory is 8GB.
use fre
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 10:09:17PM +0800, TAJUL AZHAR Mohd Tajul Ariffin wrote:
> Hi all,
> i am maybe new to BSD. I had setup my DELL server 2900 to run freeBSD
> 7.0server but i have seen a message that ignored my 4GB of my memory
> in my server. Can somebody tell me what is happening and give m
"TAJUL AZHAR Mohd Tajul Ariffin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> i am maybe new to BSD. I had setup my DELL server 2900 to run freeBSD
> 7.0server but i have seen a message that ignored my 4GB of my memory
> in my
> server. Can somebody tell me what is happening and give me some idea so
>
At 01:15 AM 6/14/2007, cadastrosonline cadastrosonline wrote:
First of all,
"Each process has its own private address space. The address space is
initially divided
into three logical segments: text,
data, and stack. "
You would be wise to read up on Processors and assembly language
progra
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 11:36 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2007-06-14 01:15, cadastrosonline cadastrosonline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > First of all,
> >
> > "Each process has its own private address space. The address space is
> > initially divided
> > into three logical segments: te
On 2007-06-14 01:15, cadastrosonline cadastrosonline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First of all,
>
> "Each process has its own private address space. The address space is
> initially divided
> into three logical segments: text,
> data, and stack. "
>
> But if the address is just something like 3435
cadastrosonline cadastrosonline wrote:
First of all,
"Each process has its own private address space. The address space is initially
divided
into three logical segments: text,
data, and stack. "
But if the address is just something like 343556 then how does it
really work? The memory is di
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 02:10:16AM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> The true value of Wikipedia is that it can deal with controversial
> subjects. ...
on the other hand, for some instances it doesn't _deal_ with controversial
subjects, but only reflects the most common opinion. Currently(*) the
on (was Re: Discussion of the
> relativeadvantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not
> used?))
>
>
> On 27/04/07, Bart Silverstrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > We don't devote time and
> > resources into being "renaissance pe
On 27/04/07, Bart Silverstrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We don't devote time and
resources into being "renaissance people".
Human intelligence is hardly limited in that regard.
While I do not subscribe to the Colin Wilson theory,
the vast majority of people contain so little information
it is
n of therelative
> advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory>3.5GB not used?))
>
>
>
> On Apr 25, 2007, at 3:51 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
>
> > --On Wednesday, April 25, 2007 15:29:04 -0400 Thomas Dickey
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> O
On Apr 25, 2007, at 3:51 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Wednesday, April 25, 2007 15:29:04 -0400 Thomas Dickey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:15:03PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
No kidding. That professor should have his Wikipedia account
banned,
and the head of his de
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 03:59:43PM +0200, Svein Halvor Halvorsen
wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
A friend of mine going for his Dr. at CMU (Patrick Wagstrom:
GNOME guy)
describes an exercise where a professor intentionally injected
false
information into Wikipedia, then gave his students a research
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 01:48:46PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to Chad Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > If you had provided the guy's Wikipedia account, we'd be able to check
> > *your* sources -- wouldn't we? As long as you don't tell us the
> > necessary information for checking u
In response to Chad Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 09:17:32AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps this was all just a devious plan by me to make you all look like
> > fools by watching your argue about the importance of checking sources
> > while none of you checked yo
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 09:17:32AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
>
> Perhaps this was all just a devious plan by me to make you all look like
> fools by watching your argue about the importance of checking sources
> while none of you checked your sources ...
>
> Muhahaha ...
>
> In any event, it's be
Halvorsen
> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 7:00 AM
> >> To: Lee Capps
> >> Cc: Thomas Dickey; Bill Moran; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> >> Subject: Re: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the
> >> relative
> >> advantages/
: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the
relative
advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?))
Bill Moran wrote:
A friend of mine going for his Dr. at CMU (Patrick Wagstrom:
GNOME guy)
describes an exercise where a professor intentionally injected
Ivan Voras wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
> Does this test demonstrate usage of memory over 4G? It's my
understanding
> that PAE starts to suffer when it has to look at the memory over 4G
(which
> is the problem it's intended to solve)
>
> If your entire test fits in under 4G, you're not seei
erfection (was Re: Discussion of the relative
> advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?))
>
>
> Bill Moran wrote:
> >> A friend of mine going for his Dr. at CMU (Patrick Wagstrom: GNOME guy)
> >> describes an exercise where a professor inte
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 21:21:47 Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:58:55PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > I definitely agree that's suboptimal. I'd expand that to include other
> > sorts of pages, other than webpages, as well. It's pretty rare for this
> > particular brand of in
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:58:55PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> I definitely agree that's suboptimal. I'd expand that to include other
> sorts of pages, other than webpages, as well. It's pretty rare for this
> particular brand of intellectually lazy person to realize that about the
> printed page
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 03:29:04PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:15:03PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > No kidding. That professor should have his Wikipedia account banned,
> > and the head of his department should be informed of his vandalism. I
> > don't suppose you kn
--On Wednesday, April 25, 2007 15:29:04 -0400 Thomas Dickey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:15:03PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
No kidding. That professor should have his Wikipedia account banned,
and the head of his department should be informed of his vandalism. I
don't
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:15:03PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> No kidding. That professor should have his Wikipedia account banned,
> and the head of his department should be informed of his vandalism. I
> don't suppose you know the name of his Wikipedia account, or his legal
> name. . . .
yawn.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 03:59:43PM +0200, Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote:
> Bill Moran wrote:
> >>A friend of mine going for his Dr. at CMU (Patrick Wagstrom: GNOME guy)
> >>describes an exercise where a professor intentionally injected false
> >>information into Wikipedia, then gave his students a r
Bill Moran wrote:
A friend of mine going for his Dr. at CMU (Patrick Wagstrom: GNOME guy)
describes an exercise where a professor intentionally injected false
information into Wikipedia, then gave his students a research assignment
that involved that information. Apparently the number of student
On Apr 25, 2007, at 8:55 AM, Bill Moran wrote:
A friend of mine going for his Dr. at CMU (Patrick Wagstrom: GNOME
guy)
describes an exercise where a professor intentionally injected false
information into Wikipedia, then gave his students a research
assignment
that involved that informat
In response to Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 08:31:53AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> > (of course, everyone knows that Wikipedia is the ultimate source of
> > information and is infallible, right?)
>
> hardly. I'd expect that most intelligent readers would have encou
In response to RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:56:09 -0700
> "Don O'Neil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I just built a new server with an Athlon 64 x2, >
> >
> >...
> >
> > What if I want to install more than 4GB? This mobo supports up to 16
> > GB... Do I need to go to the A
1 - 100 of 234 matches
Mail list logo
