Sagara Wijetunga wrote:
Charlie Kester wrote:
On Fri 04 Dec 2009 at 22:38:22 PST Sagara Wijetunga wrote:
Michael Powell wrote:
Sagara Wijetunga wrote:
[snip]
We use /usr/bin/less from ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/less, the
less-382.tar.gz, unpatched.
Why?
Does the less need to be patched in Free
In the last episode (Dec 05), Sagara Wijetunga said:
> Dan Nelson wrote:
> >
> > Since your output differs from mine, the manpages are getting damaged
> > before they reach /usr/bin/less.
> >
> > Have you maybe installed your own copy of GNU groff? The original
> > source enables ANSI escapes in m
Charlie Kester wrote:
On Fri 04 Dec 2009 at 22:38:22 PST Sagara Wijetunga wrote:
Michael Powell wrote:
Sagara Wijetunga wrote:
[snip]
We use /usr/bin/less from ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/less, the
less-382.tar.gz, unpatched.
Why?
Does the less need to be patched in FreeBSD? If so, is there such
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Dec 05), Sagara Wijetunga said:
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Dec 04), Sagara Wijetunga said:
We have an issue on Tomahawk Desktop (an upcoming FreeBSD-based distro)
that all man pages malformed.
Eg. man tar shows as follows:
1mNA
On Fri 04 Dec 2009 at 22:38:22 PST Sagara Wijetunga wrote:
Michael Powell wrote:
Sagara Wijetunga wrote:
[snip]
We use /usr/bin/less from ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/less, the
less-382.tar.gz, unpatched.
Why?
Does the less need to be patched in FreeBSD? If so, is there such a
patch exist?
Uhmm
In the last episode (Dec 05), Sagara Wijetunga said:
> Dan Nelson wrote:
> > In the last episode (Dec 04), Sagara Wijetunga said:
> >>
> >> We have an issue on Tomahawk Desktop (an upcoming FreeBSD-based distro)
> >> that all man pages malformed.
> >>
> >> Eg. man tar shows as follows:
> >> 1mNAME0
Michael Powell wrote:
Sagara Wijetunga wrote:
[snip]
We use /usr/bin/less from ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/less, the
less-382.tar.gz, unpatched.
Why?
Does the less need to be patched in FreeBSD? If so, is there such a
patch exist?
Uhmm, this may sound a little strange, but why
Sagara Wijetunga wrote:
[snip]
>
> We use /usr/bin/less from ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/less, the
> less-382.tar.gz, unpatched.
Why?
> Does the less need to be patched in FreeBSD? If so, is there such a
> patch exist?
>
Uhmm, this may sound a little strange, but why not use the one included as
p
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Dec 04), Sagara Wijetunga said:
Hi FreeBSD community
We have an issue on Tomahawk Desktop (an upcoming FreeBSD-based distro)
that all man pages malformed.
Eg. man tar shows as follows:
1mNAME0m
1mtar 22m-- format of tape archive files
1mDESCRIPTI
In the last episode (Dec 04), Sagara Wijetunga said:
> Hi FreeBSD community
>
> We have an issue on Tomahawk Desktop (an upcoming FreeBSD-based distro)
> that all man pages malformed.
>
> Eg. man tar shows as follows:
> 1mNAME0m
> 1mtar 22m-- format of tape archive files
>
> 1mDESCRIPTION0m
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 22:02:41 +0800 Sagara Wijetunga wrote:
> Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:50:31 +0800 Sagara Wijetunga wrote:
> >
> >> We have an issue on Tomahawk Desktop (an upcoming FreeBSD-based
> >> distro) that all man pages malformed.
> > What is the base FreeBSD vers
Boris Samorodov wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:50:31 +0800 Sagara Wijetunga wrote:
We have an issue on Tomahawk Desktop (an upcoming FreeBSD-based
distro) that all man pages malformed.
What is the base FreeBSD version?
FreeBSD 7.2
Eg. man tar shows as follows:
1mNAME0m
Hi,
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:50:31 +0800 Sagara Wijetunga wrote:
> We have an issue on Tomahawk Desktop (an upcoming FreeBSD-based
> distro) that all man pages malformed.
What is the base FreeBSD version?
> Eg. man tar shows as follows:
> 1mNAME0m
> 1mtar 22m-- format of tape archive files
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
