Hi.
See below.
>
> Lots of software sources are configured with GNU autotools, which is why
> a lot of third party software will only compile with GNU make. In the
> case of dealii, not only are its sources configured with autotools, but
> I looked at their docs and at http://www.dealii.org/develo
Written by Dima Sorkin on 07/26/07 16:37>>
Hi.
Thank you very much. See below.
Regards, Dima.
On 7/27/07, Nikola Lecic wrote:
No, make (BSD make) is a part of FreeBSD, gmake (GNU make) is a
third-party application, available through devel/gmake port.
They _are_ different.
Yes, I forgot there
Hi.
Thank you very much. See below.
Regards, Dima.
On 7/27/07, Nikola Lecic wrote:
No, make (BSD make) is a part of FreeBSD, gmake (GNU make) is a
third-party application, available through devel/gmake port.
They _are_ different.
Yes, I forgot there was an alias. See at the bottom of the mess
On 7/26/07, Dima Sorkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi.
I have a FreeBSD 6.2, installed it from the distribution disks, no
changes by me.
There is a "make" and a "gmake" installed on it. They report that they
are the same programm, but in fact they behave completely different.
In fact only "gmak
Hello,
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:26:28 +0300
"Dima Sorkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
> I have a FreeBSD 6.2, installed it from the distribution disks, no
> changes by me.
>
> There is a "make" and a "gmake" installed on it.
No, make (BSD make) is a part of FreeBSD, gmake (GNU make) is a
th
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 11:26:28PM +0300, Dima Sorkin wrote:
> Hi.
> I have a FreeBSD 6.2, installed it from the distribution disks, no
> changes by me.
>
> There is a "make" and a "gmake" installed on it. They report that they
> are the same programm, but in fact they behave completely different.
