I found a lightweight web server named "reptile". It supports Python
and PHP and has a good (ie, non-copyleft) license.
IIRC, I found it among a list of many web servers which support Python
(and/or ZOPE?) a link or two off the python.org home page.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ber 30, 2002 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: looking for a lightweight web server
> > On 10/30/02 at 9:38 AM Rotaru Razvan wrote:
> >
> > I am looking for a lightweight web server with php support to set
> > up on my FreeBSD system. It is very likely that the only use for
>
On 10/30/02 at 9:38 AM Rotaru Razvan wrote:
I am looking for a lightweight web server with php support to set
> up on my FreeBSD system. It is very likely that the only use for
> that web server will be phpMyAdmin so it should be multithreading
> and all that stuff.
> I want something small and v
On 10/30/02 at 9:38 AM Rotaru Razvan wrote:
|I am looking for a lightweight web server with php support to set up |on
my FreeBSD system.
|It is very likely that the only use for that web server will be
|phpMyAdmin so it should be multithreading and all that stuff. I want
|something small and very
> Well apache isn't quite lightweight. I was hoping to find something
> small, that eats as few recources as possible. I don't need cgi
> support, perl and other stuff like that. Only html+php.
> It's not like i don't like apache. I just think it's not suited for my
> kind of application.
> If you
eadache... :)
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Razvan
> > >
> >
> > What's wrong with apache?
> >
> >
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Rotaru Razvan wrote:
> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:58:05 -0800 (PST)
> From: Rotaru Razvan <[EMAIL
thttpd, works great, non forking, php can be compiled in
it is in the ports, lots of info on the website:
http://www.acme.com/software/thttpd/
Still being actively developed/maintained. Some very large sites use
it esp. for pictures, for which it seems to be super fast in
comparison with apache.
: "Rotaru Razvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John Bleichert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: Re: looking for a lightweight web server
> Well apache isn't quite lightweight. I was hopi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>> (10.30.2002 @ 0948 PST): Grant Peel said, in 0.3K: <<
> Hi,
>
> You may consider webmin. I uses its own miniserv.pl which hasn;t let me down
> yet. It also comes with PHP my admin, and it sounds like some of the other
> default modules might be of
Well apache isn't quite lightweight. I was hoping to find something
small, that eats as few recources as possible. I don't need cgi
support, perl and other stuff like that. Only html+php.
It's not like i don't like apache. I just think it's not suited for my
kind of application.
If you still think
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Rotaru Razvan wrote:
> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:38:06 -0800 (PST)
> From: Rotaru Razvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: looking for a lightweight web server
>
> Hello,
>
> I am looking for a lightweight web server with php support to set up on
> my Fr
I've never seen great reason to use anything other than Apache. Might not
fit your 'lightweight' tag, but it's not particularly taxing on resources,
and anyway the PHP element of your use is likely to the most resource
intensive.
Cheers
- Barry
--
Barry Byrne, IT Manager,
WBT Systems, Block 2,
12 matches
Mail list logo
