On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 03:00:45PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On Monday 29 November 2010 14:50:59 Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > I compiled some numerical libraries under my home
> > directory, including static and shared libs. The
> > shared lib is
> >
> > % ls ./src/libslatec.so.1
> > ./src/l
On Monday 29 November 2010 14:50:59 Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> I compiled some numerical libraries under my home
> directory, including static and shared libs. The
> shared lib is
>
> % ls ./src/libslatec.so.1
> ./src/libslatec.so.1
> %
>
> Now I'd like to test shared libraries, so I do
>
> %
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
|I compiled some numerical libraries under my home
|directory, including static and shared libs. The
|shared lib is
|
|% ls ./src/libslatec.so.1
|./src/libslatec.so.1
|%
|
|Now I'd like to test shared libraries, so I do
|
|% gfortran45 -o test01.x te
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
|I compiled some numerical libraries under my home
|directory, including static and shared libs. The
|shared lib is
|
|% ls ./src/libslatec.so.1
|./src/libslatec.so.1
|%
|
|Now I'd like to test shared libraries, so I do
|
|% gfortran45 -o test01.x te
On Dec 19, 2008, at 9:46 AM, Chris wrote:
I've bumped into a library I can't resolve and I must have a
disconnect
in how the linux_compat works because I can't see how it could be
solved.
I found that using FreeBSD Port fam for the daemon with openSUSE 10
fam 2.7.0 for my /compat/linux/l
On Dec 20, 2008, at 6:05 AM, Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:46:03 -0800 Chris wrote:
This question is may be better unswered at emulation@ ML.
Oops, I didn't ever notice that list as I've never needed Linux before.
I hate to trouble development lists with an operational issue
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:46:03 -0800 Chris wrote:
This question is may be better unswered at emulation@ ML.
> I've bumped into a library I can't resolve and I must have a disconnect
> in how the linux_compat works because I can't see how it could be
> solved.
> I have the following:
> * compat_linu
In the last episode (Aug 07), Maxim Khitrov said:
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Maxim Khitrov wrote:
> >> I take it that this happens because libmat.so is a linux binary,
> >> but is there any way to do what I'm after?
> >
> > You can't mix and match
Maxim Khitrov wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maxim Khitrov wrote:
I take it that this happens because libmat.so is a linux binary, but
is there any way to do what I'm after?
You can't mix and match Linux and FreeBSD code in the same binary. Yo
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maxim Khitrov wrote:
>
>> I take it that this happens because libmat.so is a linux binary, but
>> is there any way to do what I'm after?
>
> You can't mix and match Linux and FreeBSD code in the same binary. You will
> have
Maxim Khitrov wrote:
I take it that this happens because libmat.so is a linux binary, but
is there any way to do what I'm after?
You can't mix and match Linux and FreeBSD code in the same binary. You
will have to make a completely Linux binary, either by compiling on a
Linux system, or by i
On Apr 20, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Hyo geol, Lee wrote:
I had problem in linking error with __float128 conversion functions. I
am using FreeBSD/amd64 -current and test code is below.
[ ... ]
When I build above code, I got linking error. Is this just unsupported
functions or something missing in head
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 02:11:09PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
: I'm sure others can think of more points in support or linking to libc
: and against linking to it :-)
Most of what I want to do is low-level encryption... like copy protection
routines. I love those. So who needs libc for that
On 2005-08-30 11:43, Jonathon McKitrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:37:02PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>>On 2005-08-30 04:29, Jonathon McKitrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I'm doing some experimentation with assembly code based on the int80h.org
>>> tutorials. B
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:37:02PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
: On 2005-08-30 04:29, Jonathon McKitrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: >
: > I'm doing some experimentation with assembly code based on the int80h.org
: > tutorials. But since I am going to use malloc and some other functions,
: >
On 2005-08-30 04:29, Jonathon McKitrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm doing some experimentation with assembly code based on the int80h.org
> tutorials. But since I am going to use malloc and some other functions,
> I need to make my code link with libc rather than stand totally on its own.
>
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 03:10:13PM -0700, Simeon Nifos wrote:
> Hallo everybody,
>
> 1:) Suppose I have a Linux Library library.so.
> And I want to link it with my main.c compiled
> in FreeBSD. How can I achieve that?
You can't. You may not need to though. What are you really trying to
Thanks for the help.
now for a buildworld.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 02:37:10PM -0400, Gary Mulder wrote:
>
> >
> >Say you want to move /usr/local to live in /muz, where you have scads of
> >space. Do the following.
> > (I have my own naming convention that helps me keep track of things
> >
Say you want to move /usr/local to live in /muz, where you have scads of
space. Do the following.
(I have my own naming convention that helps me keep track of things
you can name things as you like - but try to be mnemonic).
or alternatively do (and preferably from single user mode, with a
>
> My /usr has grown short of room, so noobie question, will " ln -s /muz/newusr /usr"
> allow the system to use the new space or must I do something else?? This is a 5.2rc1
> box in need of updating. =)
Well, yes, sort of. It won't just add the space to the current space.
You would have to
Sheldon Hearn wrote:
Hi folks,
Can anyone suggest a way to link disk utilization to a process?
I can see whether my disks are busy with systat -vmstat, but I don't
know how to find out _which_ processes are causing the work.
Ideas?
You could enable kernel system accounting (please see sa(8) and
Hi Viktor,
--On Tuesday, September 16, 2003 07:16:30 PM -0700 Viktor Lazlo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think kernel.GENERIC is included by
default with each release to make sure you have a bootable kernel in the
event of problems with one you have compiled yourself and can be moved or
deleted i
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Gary wrote:
> Hello Mike,
>
> Tuesday, September 16, 2003, 11:58:31 AM, you wrote:
>
> >> dev/ad0s1a128990 86254 3241873%/
> >>
> >> -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4122347 Apr 3 04:53 kernel
> >> -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4122347 Apr 3 04:53 kernel.GENERIC
>
Hello Mike,
Tuesday, September 16, 2003, 1:59:11 PM, you wrote:
>> FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE #0: Thu Apr 3 10:53:38 GMT 2003
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
MM> If you "ls -l / | grep kernel", you'll notice that kernel and kernel.GENERIC
MM> are identical in size.
Yes, I see that on
> FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE #0: Thu Apr 3 10:53:38 GMT 2003
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
If you "ls -l / | grep kernel", you'll notice that kernel and kernel.GENERIC
are identical in size. If you were to ever build a new kernel, your current
would be moved to kernel.old, so it's rath
Hello Mike,
Tuesday, September 16, 2003, 11:58:31 AM, you wrote:
>> dev/ad0s1a128990 86254 3241873%/
>>
>> -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4122347 Apr 3 04:53 kernel
>> -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4122347 Apr 3 04:53 kernel.GENERIC
>>
>> I don't know which kernel is being used... De
Hello Mike,
Tuesday, September 16, 2003, 1:14:38 PM, you wrote:
>> How do I know which one is being loaded, can't seem to find it in dmesg.
MM> I think it's safe to assume that you're not booting kernel.GENERIC. You can
MM> specify other kernels at boot time, but if you're not doing that, you c
> How do I know which one is being loaded, can't seem to find it in dmesg.
I think it's safe to assume that you're not booting kernel.GENERIC. You can
specify other kernels at boot time, but if you're not doing that, you can
safely delete kernel.GENERIC. Some like having a generic kernel around
On Tuesday 16 September 2003 11:31 am, Gary wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
>
> Tuesday, September 16, 2003, 10:59:19 AM, you wrote:
> >> room under /usr) without any problem.
> >>
> >> Thanks for input..
>
> ALG> I don't think you should do this. In single-user mode, I don't think
> /usr ALG> would be mou
> dev/ad0s1a128990 86254 3241873%/
>
> -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4122347 Apr 3 04:53 kernel
> -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4122347 Apr 3 04:53 kernel.GENERIC
>
> I don't know which kernel is being used... Deleting one would surely help.
Unless you're specifying it at boot, you c
Hello Andrew,
Tuesday, September 16, 2003, 10:59:19 AM, you wrote:
>> room under /usr) without any problem.
>>
>> Thanks for input..
ALG> I don't think you should do this. In single-user mode, I don't think /usr
ALG> would be mounted; so the system wouln't have access to /usr/etc until you
ALG>
Hello Mike,
Tuesday, September 16, 2003, 11:04:55 AM, you wrote:
MM> Deleteing unused kernels would be a good start. What is the size of your /
MM> partition?
dev/ad0s1a128990 86254 3241873%/
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4122347 Apr 3 04:53 kernel
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 41
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Gary wrote:
> Hello Guys,
>
> It seems that on a remote box FBSD 4.8, my /dev/ad0s1a or / dir is at 73% capacity
> already, and this has me somewhat worried. I attribute this to the /etc
> dir inside of the / dir, as it contains many log files, etc... or perhaps
> the 2 ker
Deleteing unused kernels would be a good start. What is the size of your /
partition? Add most puzzling of all, why do you have logs in /etc? There
should be very little write activity on /, so the possiblilty of it filling
up shouldn't be much of a concern.
- Original Message -
From:
On Tuesday 16 September 2003 10:51 am, Gary wrote:
> Hello Guys,
>
> It seems that on a remote box FBSD 4.8, my /dev/ad0s1a or / dir is at 73%
> capacity already, and this has me somewhat worried. I attribute this to
> the /etc dir inside of the / dir, as it contains many log files, etc... or
> pe
Matthew,
> Why does linking an application such as java/javac to the /usr/local/bin/
> directory make the java and javac commands global? Whereas 'kmail' is not in
> there, but if I type it Kmail will launch anyways.
Do a "which kmail". You probably need to read about how FreeBSD (and
Linux an
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 02:54:24PM -0700, karl agee wrote:
> > sorta newbie question, I think, and not sure where to post it...so I put
> > it here.
> >
> > system: 5.0-current, lots of hard disk space.
> >
> > I am filling up / with stuff...so much so that the system is crashing
> > and r
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 02:54:24PM -0700, karl agee wrote:
> sorta newbie question, I think, and not sure where to post it...so I put
> it here.
>
> system: 5.0-current, lots of hard disk space.
>
> I am filling up / with stuff...so much so that the system is crashing
> and rebooting(!) when I
>
> sorta newbie question, I think, and not sure where to post it...so I put
> it here.
>
> system: 5.0-current, lots of hard disk space.
>
> I am filling up / with stuff...so much so that the system is crashing
> and rebooting(!) when I print. Problem seems to be that /usr directory
> is loc
39 matches
Mail list logo
