On 7/2/07, Jack Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From: Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: cpghost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: questions
>Subject: Re: kern.hz="100" stops high-pitched whine
>Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 09:46:19 -0400
>
>cpghost wr
Jack Stone wrote:
[ ... ]
A while ago, I noticed someone's kernel config that included:
hertz=2000 which made me wonder where this setting info comes from?
I've been using hertz=1000 however, with my much faster boxes, is this
appropriate now?
It depends on what you are doing: it is most usef
From: Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: cpghost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: questions
Subject: Re: kern.hz="100" stops high-pitched whine
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 09:46:19 -0400
cpghost wrote:
Are there any reasons NOT changing kern.hz from the
default 1000 back to 100?
Ian Smith wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 13:12:28 +0200 cpghost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using fan-less Soekris (266 MHz) and EPIA (500 MHz)
> boards with -STABLE. Those boards have been emitting a
> very high pitched annoying whine, similar to a dog
> whistle. Not everyone I asked could
Chuck Swiger wrote:
cpghost wrote:
Are there any reasons NOT changing kern.hz from the
default 1000 back to 100? With my typical mix of
desktop apps (EPIA) and networking / server (Soekris),
everything seems to be running just as smoothly with
100 Hz than with 1000 Hz (testing now for two weeks
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 13:12:28 +0200 cpghost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using fan-less Soekris (266 MHz) and EPIA (500 MHz)
> boards with -STABLE. Those boards have been emitting a
> very high pitched annoying whine, similar to a dog
> whistle. Not everyone I asked could hear it, but I was
cpghost wrote:
Are there any reasons NOT changing kern.hz from the
default 1000 back to 100? With my typical mix of
desktop apps (EPIA) and networking / server (Soekris),
everything seems to be running just as smoothly with
100 Hz than with 1000 Hz (testing now for two weeks
without problems). Ev
