On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 23:07:04 +0200
Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
> On 23 Aug 2012, at 17:26, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 07:51:10 -0700
> > Krims G wrote:
> >
> >> Hello, I've been looking at the /etc/group and have noticed that some
> >> groups have root included in them,
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 23:07:04 +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
> On 23 Aug 2012, at 17:26, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 07:51:10 -0700
> > Krims G wrote:
> >
> >> Hello, I've been looking at the /etc/group and have noticed that some
> >> groups have root included in them,
On 23 Aug 2012, at 17:26, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 07:51:10 -0700
> Krims G wrote:
>
>> Hello, I've been looking at the /etc/group and have noticed that some
>> groups have root included in them, for example "operator". Is it not
>> implied that root has access to all th
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 07:51:10 -0700
Krims G wrote:
> Hello, I've been looking at the /etc/group and have noticed that some
> groups have root included in them, for example "operator". Is it not
> implied that root has access to all things and groups? What is the purpose
> of adding root to a group