On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:17:15 -0600, Da Rock
wrote:
Yes, thats true. That was tested in the paper: a cyrus? using sql
database backend performed faster in searches and lookups. But writing
and deleting was a drag, and you lose the shell; but I'm not sure that
thats such a problem as one c
On 03/10/12 08:21, Mark Felder wrote:
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 14:33:53 -0600, Weldon Godfrey
wrote:
I would highly recommend looking at Dovecot. I have used courier for
several ISPs then switched to Dovecot on my last install. Its
ability for
caching the index per user is of great performance
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 14:33:53 -0600, Weldon Godfrey
wrote:
I would highly recommend looking at Dovecot. I have used courier for
several ISPs then switched to Dovecot on my last install. Its ability
for
caching the index per user is of great performance advantage if you
choose
to leverag
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Bill Campbell
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 1:46 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: imap server performance benchmarks
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012, Da Rock wrote
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012, Da Rock wrote:
> I'm reconsidering my current setup (postfix/courier) for imap and I was
> doing some research on performance comparisons between imap server
> setups. I stumbled on this article just just about fell of my chair
> laughing when I read the last article on
--As of March 9, 2012 12:44:55 PM +1000, Da Rock is alleged to have said:
I'm reconsidering my current setup (postfix/courier) for imap and I was
doing some research on performance comparisons between imap server
setups. I stumbled on this article just just about fell of my chair
laughing when I
On 09/03/2012 03:44, Da Rock wrote:
I'm reconsidering my current setup (postfix/courier) for imap and I
was doing some research on performance comparisons between imap server
setups. I stumbled on this article just just about fell of my chair
laughing when I read the last article on future benc
same Outlook 2003.
In the FreeSBD7 system, outcommented in /etc/inetd.conf the line
imap4 stream tcp nowait root /usr/local/libexec/imapd imapd
and did
# /etc/rc.d/inetd reload
Then set up a new mailaccount in Outlook 2003 for this FreeSBD7 mailbox in
EXACTLY the same way in the way I did for
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:27:32 +0100 (CET)
Pieter Donche wrote:
> I want to access a mailbox on a FreeBSD7 server via IMAP from Outlook
> 2003. I had a setup for accessing a mailbox on a Solaris server via
> IMAP from the same Outlook 2003.
>
> In the FreeSBD7 system, outcommented in /etc/inetd.c
Have you recompiled your sendmail with SASL support?
It's in the handbook:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/smtp-auth.html
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ques
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 08:09:10 -0800
Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At any rate, *where* is the IMAP stuff stashed on aristotle? A
> mail app called "dovecot" is installed. Is the password stuff
> kept somewhere in plaintext?
for dovecot, check /usr/local/etc/doveco
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 08:09:10 -0800
Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sending failed:
> Your SMTP server does not support PLAIN. Choose a different
> authentication method. The server responded: "5.7.0 authentication failed"
> The message will stay in the 'outbox'
Chris Kottaridis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have been using pop to download email messages. I'd like to switch to
> imap.
>
> My mail server is running FreeBSD 5.3
>
> The imap executable is in /usr/local/libexec and inetd.conf is setup
> right. I can telnet to port 143 I am talking to the im
On 11/1/07, Thomas Abthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try adding the following you /etc/make.conf
>
> WITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT=yes # imap-uw
> WITH_ENTOURAGE_BRAIN_DAMAGE=yes # imap-uw
>
>
> On 01/11/2007, Michael Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just installed imap-uw and saslauthd on my bo
Try adding the following you /etc/make.conf
WITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT=yes # imap-uw
WITH_ENTOURAGE_BRAIN_DAMAGE=yes # imap-uw
On 01/11/2007, Michael Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just installed imap-uw and saslauthd on my box. I'm having trouble
> getting it to accept plain text logins (in
Worked like a charm!
Thanks!
(the self-signed thing is OK.. but there was no way I was going to show it
to the VP with the 'Domain Name Mismatch' error.)
From: Tommy Scheunemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: brad davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: imap-uw / cclient
On Jul 16, 2007, at 5:20 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jul 16, 2007, at 3:04 PM, Sean Murphy wrote:
Does the IMAP protocol support storing the sent folder from
thunderbird and the local addressbook on the IMAP server? In case
a computer fails? I want to use dovecot or UW-IMAP instead of POP
On Jul 16, 2007, at 3:04 PM, Sean Murphy wrote:
Does the IMAP protocol support storing the sent folder from
thunderbird and the local addressbook on the IMAP server? In case
a computer fails? I want to use dovecot or UW-IMAP instead of POP
to protect my users data and wanted a clearer idea
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Tinguely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 11:39 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: imap-uw manuals - configuration
Supplementary
>
> Are there any messages in /var/log/debug.log ?
>
> /usr/li
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Tinguely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 11:39 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: imap-uw manuals - configuration
>
>
> Are there any messages in /var/log/debug.log ?
>
> Since telnet is
Stabbing some more into the dark ...
You can check if inetd is executing the command:
$ telnet -KN 127.0.0.1 143
it should reply something like:
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to 127.0.0.1.
Escape character is '^]'.
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4REV1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS STARTTLS
AUTH=LOG
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Tinguely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 10:52 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: imap-uw manuals - configuration
>
>
>
> Stabbing some more into the dar
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Tinguely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 7:16 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: imap-uw manuals - configuration
>
>
> >
> > inetd.conf includes:
> > pop2 stream tcp nowai
Le 05/01/2007 à 07:00:37-0800, Vizion a écrit
> I am gaving some difficulty with my pop server -- There are no man pages for
> imap-uw -- can anyone point me to some guidance..
>
> Here are some details:
>
> /etc/rc.conf includes:
> inetd_enable="YES"
>
> inetd.conf includes:
> pop2 stream
Le 05/01/2007 à 07:00:37-0800, Vizion a écrit
> I am gaving some difficulty with my pop server -- There are no man pages for
> imap-uw -- can anyone point me to some guidance..
>
> Here are some details:
>
> /etc/rc.conf includes:
> inetd_enable="YES"
>
> inetd.conf includes:
> pop2 stream
From: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using imap-uw and so I am familiar with the
"DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE" email which stays on the server.
I find this annoying, so my question is whether -all- imap servers
in the ports have this message that appears. If not, maybe
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> David Banning
> Sent: zondag 15 oktober 2006 18:49
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: imap "DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE" question
>
>
> I am using imap-uw and so I am familiar with the
> "DON'T DEL
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006, David Banning wrote:
>I am using imap-uw and so I am familiar with the
>"DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE" email which stays on the server.
>
>In my case, I read my mail -on- the server so I see this email all the
>time. Since I use imap as well, deleting it only causes it to come
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Jonathan Chen wrote:
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 03:16:26PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone configure imap-uw to accept plaintext passwords? The options listed
in the doumentation do not work. I have tried various combi
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 03:16:26PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Has anyone configure imap-uw to accept plaintext passwords? The options
> > listed
> > in the doumentation do not work. I have tried various combinations of
> > PASSWDTYPE, SSLTYPE,
On Sep 18, 2006, at 3:16 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone configure imap-uw to accept plaintext passwords? The
options listed
in the doumentation do not work. I have tried various combinations of
PASSWDTYPE, SSLTYPE, and WITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT with no success.
Or is there a better ima
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 03:16:26PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Has anyone configure imap-uw to accept plaintext passwords? The options listed
> in the doumentation do not work. I have tried various combinations of
> PASSWDTYPE, SSLTYPE, and WITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT with no success.
>
> Or is t
I tried to install cyrus-imapd, courier-imapd and dovecot, in this order.
:-)
Dovecot has my preference. I could install it in a few minutes, and it was
very easy to configure. At least it is easier than courier, for me. :-)
One thing to note here, and I've never looked into dovecot, so maybe i
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Nagy László Zsolt wrote:
Thank you for your responses!
I tried to install cyrus-imapd, courier-imapd and dovecot, in this order. :-)
Dovecot has my preference. I could install it in a few minutes, and it was
very easy to configure. At least it is easier than courier, for m
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Nagy L?szl? wrote:
Hello,
I tried cyrus-imapd, but I'm unsatisfied. Their website was down for a day.
Now it is up, but the pages were not updated after 2003. They had a majordomo
list but it is not functioning. I found another mailing list but nobody
answers. I do not
On 7/11/06, Nagy László <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I tried cyrus-imapd, but I'm unsatisfied. Their website was down for a
day. Now it is up, but the pages were not updated after 2003. They had a
majordomo list but it is not functioning. I found another mailing list
but nobody answers.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Gábor Kövesdán wrote:
Jaime wrote:
Looking in /var/log/messages, I find lines like this:
Jul 11 21:28:47 atlas kernel: pid 81702 (imapd), uid 1001: exited on
signal 11
Are you using any CFLAGS in /etc/make.conf?
I don't remember chang
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Gábor Kövesdán wrote:
Jaime wrote:
Looking in /var/log/messages, I find lines like this:
Jul 11 21:28:47 atlas kernel: pid 81702 (imapd), uid 1001: exited on signal
11
Are you using any CFLAGS in /etc/make.conf?
I don't remember changing anything in there. Check
Jaime wrote:
When trying to move a message from my INBOX folder to another
folder, I usually (4 out of 5?) find that the imapd process has
crashed. SquirrelMail is nice enough to tell me this:
ERROR: Connection dropped by IMAP server.
Query: COPY 18238,18255 "mail/Trash"
Looking in /
On Jul 11, 2006, at 12:35 PM, Erik Nørgaard wrote:
It seems that dovecot wins the votes - but does it support virtual
domains? Any tips on migration?
That all depends on how you store your user data. It is not dovecot
or courier issue. I have both courier and dovecot working in
paralle
On 7/11/2006 12:20 PM, Javier Henderson wrote:
I saw a dramatic improvement in speed with both Thunderbird and
Squirrelmail after switching from mbox to maildir.
How did you handle the transition from mbox to maildir?
-jav
For my POP users, I didn't. I leave everyone's 'inbox' in /var/mail
It seems that dovecot wins the votes - but does it support virtual domains?
I think it does not, but I do not need it. I can use postfix and
mydestination, virtual_maps. This is enough for me.
Any tips on migration?
Yes, it looks easy. I created these namespaces in dovecot.conf:
namespace
Javier Henderson wrote:
I saw a dramatic improvement in speed with both Thunderbird and
Squirrelmail after switching from mbox to maildir.
How did you handle the transition from mbox to maildir?
-jav
I just moved one of our mail servers over to postfix and dovecot using
maildir. There is a
Pete Slagle wrote:
> Nagy László wrote:
>
>> Are there any alternative IMAP servers that have good support (e.g.
>> working mailing list, up-to-date documentation), and can share IMAP
>> folders between users?
>
> I was a satisfied courier-imap user for several years. A few months ago
> I switc
Thank you for your responses!
I tried to install cyrus-imapd, courier-imapd and dovecot, in this
order. :-)
Dovecot has my preference. I could install it in a few minutes, and it
was very easy to configure. At least it is easier than courier, for me. :-)
Thanks again.
Laszlo
Nagy László wrote:
> Are there any alternative IMAP servers that have good support (e.g.
> working mailing list, up-to-date documentation), and can share IMAP
> folders between users?
I was a satisfied courier-imap user for several years. A few months ago
I switched to dovecot because it is fas
I saw a dramatic improvement in speed with both Thunderbird and
Squirrelmail after switching from mbox to maildir.
How did you handle the transition from mbox to maildir?
-jav
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
On 7/11/2006 11:18 AM, Greg Groth wrote:
On 7/11/2006 9:29 AM, albi wrote:
Erik Norgaard wrote:
I would like to ask a couple more in depth questions pertaining to this
conversation. We recently switched from POP3 & Outlook Express to IMAP
using IMAP-UW & Thunderbird. Personally I have had
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 11:07, Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to "Nagy László" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Are there any alternative IMAP servers that have good support (e.g.
> > working mailing list, up-to-date documentation), and can share IMAP
> > folders between users?
>
> > dovecot -- early stag
On 7/11/2006 9:29 AM, albi wrote:
Erik Norgaard wrote:
Regarding cyrus documentation: I think they have stopped maintaining the
documentation and moved to use the wiki - unfortunately, you don't
stumble into the wiki first :(
i can happily recommend Dovecot, really easy to install (Cyrus real
In response to "Nagy László" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hello,
>
> I tried cyrus-imapd, but I'm unsatisfied. Their website was down for a
> day. Now it is up, but the pages were not updated after 2003. They had a
> majordomo list but it is not functioning. I found another mailing list
> but no
Erik Norgaard wrote:
> Regarding cyrus documentation: I think they have stopped maintaining the
> documentation and moved to use the wiki - unfortunately, you don't
> stumble into the wiki first :(
i can happily recommend Dovecot, really easy to install (Cyrus really
isn't), supports both Maildir
Reko Turja wrote:
The downside of Cyrus is the abysmal documentation, but once you get
hang of it, it's one fine IMAP/POP server. And of course there's project
wiki at
http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu/
which definitely is updated after 2003 :)
I too can recommend cyrus-imap which I have use
- Original Message -
From: "Nagy László" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 4:29 PM
Subject: IMAP server alternatives
Hello,
I tried cyrus-imapd, but I'm unsatisfied. Their website was down for
a day. Now it is up, but the pages were not updated after 2003. They
On Sunday 26 February 2006 14:26, Perttu Laine wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have problem with imap. Works fine if blackhole (tcp) is set to 0, but I
> set it 1 or 2 imap stops responding (timeouts). Dovecot imap and freebsd
> 5.4. So. What could be case here?
I suspect that it's trying to do something to
Perttu Laine wrote on Sunday 26 February 2006 14:37:
> Oh damn. It was problem with dummy sysadmin only (me). I tried to connect
> localhost instead of real hostname and dovecot didn't answer there. So.
> You all can forget earlier posts. :)
>
I have a bad memory anyway :-)
_
Oh damn. It was problem with dummy sysadmin only (me). I tried to connect
localhost instead of real hostname and dovecot didn't answer there. So. You
all can forget earlier posts. :)
--
kpn @ IRCnet
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http:/
On 2/26/06, Kees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have problem with imap. Works fine if blackhole (tcp) is set to 0, but I
> > set it 1 or 2 imap stops responding (timeouts). Dovecot imap and freebsd
> > 5.4. So. What could be case here?
> Strange, I use FreeBSD-5.4 and dovecot with imap as well, b
Perttu Laine wrote on Sunday 26 February 2006 13:26:
> Hello!
>
> I have problem with imap. Works fine if blackhole (tcp) is set to 0, but I
> set it 1 or 2 imap stops responding (timeouts). Dovecot imap and freebsd
> 5.4. So. What could be case here?
Strange, I use FreeBSD-5.4 and dovecot with
Jose Borquez wrote:
> SECURITY REPORT:
> This port has installed the following binaries which execute with
> increased privileges.
> /usr/local/libexec/mlock
>
> What can I do to minimize this security risk? Do I create an mlock user?
In fact, every port that installs a suid-binary wil
Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
On 19 Oct Frank Staals wrote:
Don't be so certain about that. "fstaals.net" *is* a valid hostname,
and its IP-address can easily be found via DNS, and it can be
connected to.
The MX-configuration of my domain is pointing to fstaals.net , to add
an subdomain for my sma
On 19 Oct Frank Staals wrote:
> >Don't be so certain about that. "fstaals.net" *is* a valid hostname,
> >and its IP-address can easily be found via DNS, and it can be
> >connected to.
> >
> The MX-configuration of my domain is pointing to fstaals.net , to add
> an subdomain for my small mailserver
albi wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 10:46:23 +0200
Frank Staals <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Common Name (FQDN of your server) []: fstaals.net
Common Name (default) []: localhost
When I try to connect with my mail-client ( thunderbird ) it states that
the mail-certificate doesn't match with the
Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 03:49:15PM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
Common Name (FQDN of your server) []: fstaals.net
The first answer that come to my mind is that your IMAP{ server is
certainly NOT called "fstaals.net", but it should rather be
"imap.fstaals.net" or
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 10:46:23 +0200
Frank Staals <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Common Name (FQDN of your server) []: fstaals.net
> Common Name (default) []: localhost
>
> When I try to connect with my mail-client ( thunderbird ) it states that
> the mail-certificate doesn't match with the server I
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 03:49:15PM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> > Common Name (FQDN of your server) []: fstaals.net
>
> The first answer that come to my mind is that your IMAP{ server is
> certainly NOT called "fstaals.net", but it should rather be
> "imap.fstaals.net" or "mail.fstaals.net" or s
> Common Name (FQDN of your server) []: fstaals.net
The first answer that come to my mind is that your IMAP{ server is
certainly NOT called "fstaals.net", but it should rather be
"imap.fstaals.net" or "mail.fstaals.net" or something.
You must put the exact name of your server, as it is known by D
Thank you very much ; I will install freeBSD 5.3
Pierre Binelli
Gibraltar
- Original Message -
From: "Lowell Gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pierre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 5:46 PM
Subject: Re: IMAP SUPPORT
&qu
"Pierre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I neeed install imap-2004c1 in my freeBSD 5.2.1
You are trying to install an old version of the UW IMAP server on an
old (and officially unsupported -- it was released for "early
adopters," not production use) version of FreeBSD. I would recommend
that you
On 08/20/05 06:51 PM, Glyn Tebbutt sat at the `puter and typed:
> Louis LeBlanc wrote:
>
> That's great thanks very much
> Very extensive :)
I hope you find it useful. That rc has taken me years to tweak out -
it used to deliver mail to Cyrus mailboxes until I moved to Courier 2
or 3 years ago.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> On 08/20/05 04:17 PM, Glyn Tebbutt sat at the `puter and typed:
>
>>Louis LeBlanc wrote:
>>
>>>On 08/20/05 08:00 AM, David Kelly sat at the `puter and typed:
>>>
>>>
On Aug 20, 2005, at 6:15 AM, Pat Maddox wrote:
>
On 08/20/05 04:17 PM, Glyn Tebbutt sat at the `puter and typed:
> Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> > On 08/20/05 08:00 AM, David Kelly sat at the `puter and typed:
> >
> >>On Aug 20, 2005, at 6:15 AM, Pat Maddox wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>I run courier-imap, works really well for me.
> >>
> >>I'm reading this th
I recommend Courier IMAP, largely for it's easy mysql database support.
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Holmes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 2:27 PM
Subject: IMAP Server suggestions
It's been a while since I've set up an IMAP server, but I would like to
d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> On 08/20/05 08:00 AM, David Kelly sat at the `puter and typed:
>
>>On Aug 20, 2005, at 6:15 AM, Pat Maddox wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I run courier-imap, works really well for me.
>>
>>I'm reading this thread because courier-imap works but
On 08/20/05 08:00 AM, David Kelly sat at the `puter and typed:
>
> On Aug 20, 2005, at 6:15 AM, Pat Maddox wrote:
>
> > I run courier-imap, works really well for me.
>
> I'm reading this thread because courier-imap works but I'm less than
> happy with maillog being flooded with:
>
> Aug 20 07
Hi Tim,
You can also check courrier-imap.
Afnog has an excellent how to at the link
http://ws.afnog.org/afnog2004/t1/mail/index.htm
Enjoy!
Simon
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 02:27:54 -0400
Tim Holmes wrote:
> It's been a while since I've set up an
On Aug 20, 2005, at 6:15 AM, Pat Maddox wrote:
I run courier-imap, works really well for me.
I'm reading this thread because courier-imap works but I'm less than
happy with maillog being flooded with:
Aug 20 07:41:12 Grumpy imapd: Failed to create cache file:
maildirwatch (dkelly)
Aug
I run courier-imap, works really well for me.
> On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 02:27:54 -0400
> Tim Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It's been a while since I've set up an IMAP server, but I would like to
> > do so again. Can anybody recommend which IMAP server to install? Any
> > suggestions on t
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 02:27:54 -0400
Tim Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's been a while since I've set up an IMAP server, but I would like to
> do so again. Can anybody recommend which IMAP server to install? Any
> suggestions on the matter would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
dovecot
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 02:27:54 -0400
Tim Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's been a while since I've set up an IMAP server, but I would
> like to do so again. Can anybody recommend which IMAP server to
> install? Any suggestions on the matter would be greatly
> appreciated. Thank you!
If
The accounts are kept in MySQL via a PostfixAdmin installation. Again, I can
deliver mail all day to any virtual host / account I setup in PostfixAdmin but
I am not able to get SquirrellMail to login to get the mail.
I am using the following group of applicaitons together:
imap-uw / squirrell
--On Wednesday, July 06, 2005 20:18:37 -0700 "M. Goodell"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I have successfully installed: imap-uw / squirrellmail / mysql / postfix
/ PostfixAdmin and have setup postfix virtual domain capability. Postfix
accepts mail for virtual hosts / accounts that I configu
Heinrich Rebehn wrote:
Hi List,
I have just installed imap-uw from ports, but when i try to read mail
using Mozilla, imapd crashes:
Jun 9 16:01:06 antsrv1 imapd
Jun 9 16:01:06 antsrv1 in free():
Jun 9 16:01:06 antsrv1 error:
Jun 9 16:01:06 antsrv1 chunk is already free
Jun 9 16:01:06 ant
It turns out that the authlibmysql.so file wasn't there anymore...it
doesn't get deleted every time the machine reboots, does it? That
wouldn't make any sense.
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 19:35:08 -0700, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've had Courier-IMAP working great with a MySQL database fo
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 11:45:09 -0700 (PDT), "Joshua Lewis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to set up my mail server with Postfix and wish to use IMAP.
>
> I tried asking the postfix mailing list this question and did not receice
> and feedback.
>
> Does Postfix have built in IMAP support
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 11:45:09AM -0700 or thereabouts, Joshua Lewis wrote:
>
> Does Postfix have built in IMAP support or do I have to use a third party.
> If I have to use a third party are there any suggestions?
>
Postfix does not have any kind of IMAP support.
My suggestion is to use Courie
In the last episode (Aug 11), Joshua Lewis said:
> I am trying to set up my mail server with Postfix and wish to use
> IMAP.
>
> I tried asking the postfix mailing list this question and did not
> receice and feedback.
>
> Does Postfix have built in IMAP support or do I have to use a third
> part
On Tuesday 25 May 2004 20:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hey all,
> I have looked into this before but never really found too much info on
> it. On one of my FreeBSD boxes I run Squirrelmail. I was told that
> there is a Imap Proxy server that can be ran on the local box to help
> with some s
"Clarence Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You could download Eudora for Windows and import
> the outlook email into Eudora. It stores the email in
> mbox format. I don't know if their mbox format is fully
> unix standard, but they are the same people that maintain
> the qpopper pop3 daemon, s
Cla.
- Original Message -
From: "Joshua Lokken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 4:47 PM
Subject: Fw: Re: IMAP server and client recommendations?
>
> From: Kevin Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 21 Apr
From: Kevin Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 21:42:00 -0700
To: Danny MacMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IMAP server and client recommendations?
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.613)
On Apr 21, 2004, at 21:22, Danny MacMillan wrote:
>Hello
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 15:40:40 +0100, Jim Hatfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 05:42:00 +0100, in local.freebsd.questions you
wrote:
Almost right, but not quite. You set up an IMAP server that stores
mail in the desired format, add the IMAP support to Outlook, and then
drag/drop
I have had good luck with uw-imap and dovecot. Dovecot seems to work better
in FreeBSD 5.21 though. I had problems with uw-imap crashing. Dovecot is
arguably more secure. The main drawback to dovecot is that it allows
multiple clients access to a mailbox at once. It works great for well
beha
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 05:42:00 +0100, in local.freebsd.questions you
wrote:
>Almost right, but not quite. You set up an IMAP server that stores
>mail in the desired format, add the IMAP support to Outlook, and then
>drag/drop the mail into the IMAP mailbox. There is no equivalent
>client-side e
* Danny MacMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [0423 05:23]:
> Hello.
>
> I have six or seven hundred megabytes of email imprisoned in a few .pst
> (Microsoft Outlook "Personal Folders") files. I've been looking for an
> alternative email client lately. Of course, the issue is converting these
> old m
Danny MacMillan wrote:
Hello.
I have six or seven hundred megabytes of email imprisoned in a few .pst
(Microsoft Outlook "Personal Folders") files. I've been looking for an
alternative email client lately. Of course, the issue is converting
these old messages so that they are usable by the ne
Danny MacMillan a écrit :
Is it feasible to use the IMAP server as a mail storage solution like
this? Can anyone recommend a good IMAP server (for FreeBSD of course)
and give me some tips on considerations for choosing one? I blush to
say it, but I've never even had an IMAP account.
Thanks i
On Apr 21, 2004, at 21:22, Danny MacMillan wrote:
Hello.
I have six or seven hundred megabytes of email imprisoned in a few
.pst (Microsoft Outlook "Personal Folders") files. I've been looking
for an alternative email client lately. Of course, the issue is
converting these old messages so th
samy lancher wrote:
I think IMAP_UW rejects non-encrypted logins by default. So I guess
LOGINDISABLED has got something to do with the default SSL support in IMAP-UW.
Is there any way to disable default SSL support, without actually reinstalling
cclient and IMAP with make variables WITHOUT_SSL or W
Hi, you are bit .. vague.
What's in your logs on the server itself?
What does it respond with when you are telnetting to the port?
Are you sure you should use /usr/local/etc/imapd? isn't that
/usr/local/libexec/imapd or something??
Hope that this gives us some more insight info so we can perhaps a
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
