Re: i'm lost in named trouble.

2004-12-29 Thread Mark Magiera
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 14:00:04 +0100 (MET) Mipam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I configured plenty of nameservers also with bind9, but this time > i cannot figure out what's wrong anymore, i'm lost. > When i do host 127.0.0.1, i get a normal answer. > When i do host localhost, i get a normal

Re: i'm lost in named trouble.

2004-12-29 Thread Mipam
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Nelis Lamprecht wrote: > On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 14:39:44 +0100 (MET), Mipam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Nelis Lamprecht wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 14:00:04 +0100 (MET), Mipam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > controls { > > > >

Re: i'm lost in named trouble.

2004-12-29 Thread Nelis Lamprecht
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 14:39:44 +0100 (MET), Mipam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Nelis Lamprecht wrote: > > > On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 14:00:04 +0100 (MET), Mipam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > controls { > > > inet 127.0.0.1 port 953 > > > allow { 1

Re: i'm lost in named trouble.

2004-12-29 Thread Mipam
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Nelis Lamprecht wrote: > On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 14:00:04 +0100 (MET), Mipam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > controls { > > inet 127.0.0.1 port 953 > > allow { 127.0.0.1; } keys { "bla"; }; > > }; > > perhaps this should be: > > controls { >

Re: i'm lost in named trouble.

2004-12-29 Thread Nelis Lamprecht
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 14:00:04 +0100 (MET), Mipam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > controls { > inet 127.0.0.1 port 953 > allow { 127.0.0.1; } keys { "bla"; }; > }; perhaps this should be: controls { inet 127.0.0.1 port 953 allow { localhost; } keys