sara lidgey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The machine won't boot from either drive connected as a master. I tried
> them one at a time. I'm guessing I'll have to boot from a CD but don't know
> the process. Any help is appreciated.
> Thanks,
> S.
>
Hmmm... I can only suggest using a livecd, for ins
Hi,
The machine won't boot from either drive connected as a master. I tried them
one at a time. I'm guessing I'll have to boot from a CD but don't know the
process. Any help is appreciated.
Thanks,
S.
Mikhail Goriachev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: sara lidgey wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've be
sara lidgey wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've been running a server using FreeBSD 5.3 and gmirror to mirror two
> identical IDE hard drives. Its been running great for over a year. But
> recently everything went down and when I reboot and put a monitor on it I get
> the following errors on screen:
On Saturday 21 May 2005 03:42, the author Thomas Hurst contributed to the
dialogue on Re: FreeBSD 5.3 Boot issues - reposted:
& * Vizion ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
&
& > This system has been built in a mini ATX case and has a Proxim Harmony
& > 802.11a Model 8150 PCI c
On Saturday 21 May 2005 03:42, the author Thomas Hurst contributed to the
dialogue on Re: FreeBSD 5.3 Boot issues - reposted:
& * Vizion ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
&
& > This system has been built in a mini ATX case and has a Proxim Harmony
& > 802.11a Model 8150 PCI c
* Vizion ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> This system has been built in a mini ATX case and has a Proxim Harmony
> 802.11a Model 8150 PCI card on (I am on a boat - then intention is to
> be able to disconnect it from the ships network, lug it to a position
> in range of a wireless network and do a por
I know this is going to be a hot in the dark for me since I left 4x behind
quite a long while ago, but I seem to remember reading something about
some compatibility issues between nis on 4x and 5x. There were changes
that could be made to work around it, but wow...I just don't remember
where I
Richard Verwayen wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 11.05.2005, 16:53 -0700 schrieb Dixit, Viraj:
>
>>Folks,
>>
>>I have accidentally changed the permissions to my directories on my test
>>system. Now I cannot login either on console using root or any other login
>>account. I simply cannot login, the per
Kris Kennaway a écrit :
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 02:24:51PM +0200, Herv? Kergourlay wrote:
I change the kernel with the following command
sysctl kern.corefile="/cores/%U/%P%N.core"
Make sure those directories exist and are writable by the user. They
won't be created automatically.
simon butsana wrote:
When trying to install FreeBSD 5.3 on my computer, I get the following error "No disks found".
But I can install without any problem Linux or Windows on that computer. The hard disk is IDE 160 GB (Western Digital).
Does anyone have an idea on a solution?
5.4 just came out,
Kris Kennaway a écrit :
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 02:24:51PM +0200, Herv? Kergourlay wrote:
I change the kernel with the following command
sysctl kern.corefile="/cores/%U/%P%N.core"
Make sure those directories exist and are writable by the user. They
won't be created automatically.
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 02:24:51PM +0200, Herv? Kergourlay wrote:
> >>I change the kernel with the following command
> >>sysctl kern.corefile="/cores/%U/%P%N.core"
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Make sure those directories exist and are writable by the user. They
> >won't be created automatically.
> >
> >
Kris Kennaway a écrit :
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 09:33:03AM +0200, Herv? Kergourlay wrote:
we are porting our product on FreeBSD 5.3
it's a backup product which is still running on FreeBSD 4.0
here's a list of questions after checking the documentation
1) PAM
it's working, the only problem is wit
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 09:33:03AM +0200, Herv? Kergourlay wrote:
> we are porting our product on FreeBSD 5.3
>
> it's a backup product which is still running on FreeBSD 4.0
>
> here's a list of questions after checking the documentation
>
> 1) PAM
>
> it's working, the only problem is with the
Am Mittwoch, den 11.05.2005, 16:53 -0700 schrieb Dixit, Viraj:
> Folks,
>
> I have accidentally changed the permissions to my directories on my test
> system. Now I cannot login either on console using root or any other login
> account. I simply cannot login, the permissions change has done it.
/etc/X11/xorg.conf to change the driver "nv" to
"nvidia"
enjoy the open gl screensavers!
Randy Dawson
- Original Message -
From: "Soheil Hassas Yeganeh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 1:21 AM
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 NVID
I had installed the nvidia-1.0.7174 from nvidia.
I had used 1.0-6113 from ports. It works nice. But i wanted just to
upgrade to the new NVIDIA Version.
On 03 May 2005 12:08:40 -0400, Lowell Gilbert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I have proble
Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have problem using NVIDIA-1.0.7174.
> It failed to load GLX. What i can do for this?
>
> This is a warnings and errors of my X.org log
>
> (WW) NV(0): Option "CursorShadow" is not used
> (EE) Failed to initialize GLX extension (NVIDIA X drive
On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 16:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> freebsd 5.3 is release and become stable version soon,
> i have a question, i wanna secure my freebsd box what should i do to optimize
> it?
>
Try the handbook:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/security.html
Rob
> Plug a USB mass-storage-type still camera, mount it, unplug it, and
> try to forcibly unmount it using 'umount -f'. The whole system hangs
> right away.
>
> Is it a known bug ?
I can confirm this. FreeBSD-5.3-RELEASE-p9.
Mark
--
PGP: http://www.darklogik.org/pub/pgp/pgp.txt
B776 43DC 8A5D EA
On Apr 8, 2005 12:00 PM, WOLOSCHAK, FRANK, JR (FRANK)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good Morning,
>
> I am having problems installing FreeBSD 5.3. It appears that the installation
> options do not include: "Configure XFree86 Server" and "Configure XFree86
> Desktop". I am aware that version 5.3 n
On Apr 8, 2005 10:00 AM, WOLOSCHAK, FRANK, JR (FRANK)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> QUESTIONS:
> 1) Why doesn't the FreeBSD 5.3 install give configuration options for the
> X-Windows server and desktop?
If you check out the handbook it states that the X installation has
been removed from the in
--On onsdag, mars 16, 2005 20.13.03 +0100 Peter Much
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:35:16PM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote:
!
! --On onsdag, mars 16, 2005 11.43.31 +0100 Peter Much
! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
!
! >! So, you're saying that pctclsh *can* access, but pgaccess
Hi,
>On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> i run into a problem on a FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE Applicationserver (2GB
>of RAM,
>> 4GB Swap, Dual XEON 3.06Ghz).
>> The box serves the "xfrce4-panel" for 80 Network Clients via ssh so
>the
>> Users can start OpenOffice.org and firefox
Hi,
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i run into a problem on a FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE Applicationserver (2GB of RAM,
4GB Swap, Dual XEON 3.06Ghz).
The box serves the "xfrce4-panel" for 80 Network Clients via ssh so the
Users can start OpenOffice.org and firefox from that panel.
It is go
Mario wrote:
># [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>>
>> kern.maxfilesperproc: 5898
>> kern.maxusers: 384
>>
>> My /boot/loader.conf looks like:
>> kern.maxfiles="65536"
>> kern.ipc.nmbclusters=64000
>> kern.ipc.nmbufs=256000
>> kern.maxproc=8192
>> kern.ipc.somaxconn=4096
>>
>>So i do not get it, imho the confi
# [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> kern.maxfilesperproc: 5898
> kern.maxusers: 384
>
> My /boot/loader.conf looks like:
> kern.maxfiles="65536"
> kern.ipc.nmbclusters=64000
> kern.ipc.nmbufs=256000
> kern.maxproc=8192
> kern.ipc.somaxconn=4096
>
> So i do not get it, imho the configuration is just fine, b
I have made some limited progress on the FreeBSD 5.3 Netserver problem
outline below.
I have been able to install FreeBSD 5.3 on a Netserver using the onboard
SCSI card. However it will not install if I use the HP 1si NetRaid card
for the SCSI drives.
So it appears to be having a problem with
John,
That did the trick. I built a new kernel with the GEOM_STRIPE
option and added an entry to my fstab to mount the volume(stripe) and
everything worked like a charm. In the end this turned out to be much
simpler than I had anticipated. I wish this information would have
been available in t
Nick Pavlica wrote:
>Andrea,
> I have started testing with gstripe and have had good results to
>this point. I'm still a little unclear about how to make my stripe
>persistent after a reboot? My server consists of three drives. A
>40GB drive that has the operating system and two 200Gb drives
Andrea,
I have started testing with gstripe and have had good results to
this point. I'm still a little unclear about how to make my stripe
persistent after a reboot? My server consists of three drives. A
40GB drive that has the operating system and two 200Gb drives that I'm
using for the raid
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:35:16PM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote:
!
! --On onsdag, mars 16, 2005 11.43.31 +0100 Peter Much
! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
!
! >! So, you're saying that pctclsh *can* access, but pgaccess *cannot*?
! >Odd... ! I would expect they'd both use the same lib to connect,
Hi Doug,
I will take a look at this. Have you used it on any production
servers? How does it compare to vinum/gvinum in terms of performance
reliability?
--Thanks!
Nick
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:04:31 -0600, Doug Poland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 02:01:06PM -0700, Nick
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 02:01:06PM -0700, Nick Pavlica wrote:
> All,
> I would like to set up a raid 0 volume on my 5.3 server using two
> identical SATA drives.After reading through a number of documents
> I noticed that there are two related utilities to do this, Vinum and
> Gvinum. Which u
Ups, forgot the mailinglist...
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 07:28:14PM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote:
Hi Palle,
I'm glad You are in with it!
! There is (and was in 5.3 release) a knob to build postgresql with Kerberos.
! WITH_HEIMDAL_KRB5=YES. Did you try that when building Po
Hi Peter,
There is (and was in 5.3 release) a knob to build postgresql with Kerberos.
WITH_HEIMDAL_KRB5=YES. Did you try that when building PostgreSQL? It would
probably do the same thing as you managed by trying around with the linker
command. Setting this knob to yes will add --with-krb5=/usr
it was said:
>I am following the directions in man jail to set up a jail on
my
>system:
>
>D=/here/is/the/jail
>cd /usr/src
>mkdir -p $D
>make world DESTDIR=$D
^
Try changing this line to "env DESTDIR=$D && make world"
>cd etc
>make distribution DESTDIR=$D
>mount_devfs devfs
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
ISP Informatique writes:
Hello, I recently have just passed a server of FreeBSD 4.2 to FreeBSD
5.3.
Why? The rule for production systems is to never fix what isn't broken;
what was wrong with FreeBSD 4.2 that required an upgrade to 5.3?
Sometimes you doesn't ha
ISP Informatique writes:
> Hello, I recently have just passed a server of FreeBSD 4.2 to FreeBSD
> 5.3.
Why? The rule for production systems is to never fix what isn't broken;
what was wrong with FreeBSD 4.2 that required an upgrade to 5.3?
--
Anthony
___
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 23:59 -0800, pete wright wrote:
> A couple of things will be neccessary to help us help you. Custum
> kernel, post or link to your KERNEL_CONFIG, or better yet a dmesg.
> Also I'd suggest testing this first w/o SMP enabled (not sure if SMP
> is even that helpfull with hyper
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 08:28:32 +0100, cyb <"cyb."@gmx.net> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> from time to time my FreeBSD freezes under heavy hdd load and only a
> hard reset will bring it back to life with fsck complaining about
> 'Softupdate Inconsistencies'.
>
> I had this behaviour on 5.3-RELEASE, 5.3-RELEA
On Sun, 2005-02-27 at 15:26, Ean Kingston wrote:
> On February 27, 2005 08:59 am, Robert Slade wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry if this is dumb question.
> >
> > I have a new install of FreeBSD on a single IDE drive. I have backed this
> > up so I am not too concerned about drive failure. I have now ad
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 01:59:35PM +, Robert Slade wrote:
> I have a new install of FreeBSD on a single IDE drive. I have backed this up
> so I am not too concerned about drive failure. I have now added 2, 250 Gbyte
> drives (ad3 and ad4) to hold data. I would like to mirror them using sofwar
On February 27, 2005 08:59 am, Robert Slade wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry if this is dumb question.
>
> I have a new install of FreeBSD on a single IDE drive. I have backed this
> up so I am not too concerned about drive failure. I have now added 2, 250
> Gbyte drives (ad3 and ad4) to hold data. I would l
> I have read the manual and searched the web for a simple way to do the above.
> The manual seems to cover complex solutions and may be somewhat behind the
> times.
Personally I would go for geom_mirror. See gmirror(8) ('man gmirror') for usage
instructions including examples. Creating a mirro
In the last episode (Feb 25), Tim Traver said:
> I have just started using the 5.X branch of FreeBSD, and needed to
> mount a hot swap drive in a second drive bay. In the past, I've
> simply run MAKEDEV, and it made the device files for me, and then I
> was able to mount the drive and I was on my w
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 05:27:16AM +0100, Jack Raats wrote:
> Yesterday I've install FreeBSD 5.3 on a machine. After compiling the kernel
> with device my, I can connect through the network with that machine.
> Everything works fine, but when I try to update the source tree or ftp-ing
> to a local
On February 10, 2005 04:53 pm, Jeff Behl wrote:
> >Any so-called "benchmark" comparing Linux to anything else (especially
> >windoze) has been polluted by the tradition in the linux/windoze world
> >of running their disks in the completely unsafe "asynchronous" mode so
> >popular with the ATA disk
Any so-called "benchmark" comparing Linux to anything else (especially
windoze) has been polluted by the tradition in the linux/windoze world
of running their disks in the completely unsafe "asynchronous" mode so
popular with the ATA disk drive manufacturers. This method means that
you never actu
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 04:22:02PM -0800, Matt Olander wrote:
> hey gang,
>
> We've got a customer that is considering a network expansion while moving
> from Linux to FreeBSD.
>
> They are big users of MySQL and have been running it on Linux.
>
> Most of the information that I've found is a bit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 16:44 -0800, Matt Olander wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 07:58:56PM -0500, Alec Berryman wrote:
Also, does anybody have any FreeBSD 5.3/MySQL benchmarks? I
searched the mailing lists but didn't turn up anything.
>>>
>>> There was an arti
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 16:44 -0800, Matt Olander wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 07:58:56PM -0500, Alec Berryman wrote:
> > > Also, does anybody have any FreeBSD 5.3/MySQL benchmarks? I searched
> > > the mailing lists but didn't turn up anything.
> >
> > There was an article posted to Newsforge t
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 07:58:56PM -0500, Alec Berryman wrote:
> > Also, does anybody have any FreeBSD 5.3/MySQL benchmarks? I searched
> > the mailing lists but didn't turn up anything.
>
> There was an article posted to Newsforge today about benchmarking
> MySQL on different operating systems.
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Matt Olander wrote:
> Also, does anybody have any FreeBSD 5.3/MySQL benchmarks? I searched the
> mailing lists but didn't turn up anything.
This was posted to some NetBSD lists today:
http://software.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=04/12/27/1243207&from=rss
This "Comparing MySQ
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Nick Pavlica wrote:
> I was wondering if any progress has been made in determining the cause
> of the poor disk I/O performance illustrated by the testing in this
> thread? Now that 5.3 is labeled as the production stable version, and
> 4.x is labeled as legacy, improving th
=
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Cotrina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Irina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 and sshd
>
> sshd is disabled by default in FreeBSD 5.3, e
sshd is disabled by default in FreeBSD 5.3, enable it by hand:
# /etc/rc.d/sshd start
Then, If you want it to be started at boot time, add the following line to
/etc/rc.conf :
sshd_enable="YES"
HTH
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Irina wrote:
> Hello at FreeBSD list.
>
> I have installed FreeBSD 5.3, ha
From: "Irina"
Hello at FreeBSD list.
I have installed FreeBSD 5.3, have not upgraded to STABLE yet. During the
installation I created a user account that is in the "wheel" group. After
the installation, logged in as that user at console with no problems. But
can not login using putty from my
Matt Rechkemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 05:01:53PM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> > > What configuration file should I execute this on? login.conf?
> >
> > Yes. Go back to /etc/login.conf and read the first few lines.
>
> Lowell, I can't thank you enough :-). I sh
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 05:01:53PM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> > What configuration file should I execute this on? login.conf?
>
> Yes. Go back to /etc/login.conf and read the first few lines.
Lowell, I can't thank you enough :-). I should have RTFP in the first place.
Now another question r
All,
I was wondering if any progress has been made in determining the
cause of the poor disk I/O performance illustrated by the testing in
this thread? Now that 5.3 is labeled as the production stable
version, and 4.x is labeled as legacy, improving the performance of
the 5.4+ distributions is
Matt Rechkemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 02:17:37PM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> >
> > It works for me; maybe you forgot to run cap_mkdb(1)?
>
> What configuration file should I execute this on? login.conf?
Yes. Go back to /etc/login.conf and read the first few l
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 02:17:37PM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>
> It works for me; maybe you forgot to run cap_mkdb(1)?
What configuration file should I execute this on? login.conf?
Thanks!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.
Matt Rechkemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi folks,
>
> I recently setup FreeBSD 5.3R on my P4 2.4 GHz system and have a slight
> problem with it not respecting the limits set in /etc/login.conf. The entry
> I've made in /etc/login.conf is below:
>
> bopm:\
> :openfiles=8192:\
>
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> >I/O (reads, writes at fairly large multiples of the sector size -- 512k is
> >a good number) and small I/O size (512 bytes is good). This will help
> >identify the source along two dimmensions: are we looking at a basic
> >storage I/O problem that's pre
At 08:14 PM 27/01/2005, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> My tests use the exact same disk layout, and hardware. However, I have
> had consistent results on all 4 boxes that I have tested on.
I am redoing mine so that I boot from a different drive and just test on
one large RAID5 partition so that the lay
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Nick Pavlica wrote:
> > The move to an MPSAFE VFS will help with that a lot, I should think.
>
> Do you know if this will find it's way to 5.x in the near future?
Hopefully not too quickly, it's fairly experimental. I know there's
interest in getting it into 5.x however.
> The move to an MPSAFE VFS will help with that a lot, I should think.
Do you know if this will find it's way to 5.x in the near future?
>
> Also, while on face value this may seem odd, could you try the following
> additional variables:
>
> - Layer the test UFS partition directly over ad0 ins
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Terry R. Friedrichsen wrote:
> Is anybody besides *me* having file system corruption problems with
> FreeBSD 5.3? I've looked around on several of the mailing lists and
> found no men- tion of this.
>
> I have two different platforms on which I'm trying to run FreeBSD 5.3.
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Robert Watson wrote:
> While it's not for the feint of heart, it might be interesting to see
> how results compare in 6-CURRENT + debugging of various sorts (including
> malloc) turned off, and debug.mpsafevfs turned on. One possible issue
> with the twe/twa drivers is that
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 01:47 PM 26/01/2005, Nick Pavlica wrote:
> >All,
> > With the recent release of 4.11 I thought that I would give it a
>
> Yes, I found the same thing basically. My test box is a P4 3Ghz with 2G
> of RAM on a 3ware 8605 controller with 4 drives in R
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 03:53:46PM -0700, Terry R. Friedrichsen wrote:
> I wrote:
>
> >> try running something that works the file system and simply turn off the
> >> system power in the middle of it.
>
> to which [EMAIL PROTECTED] replied:
>
> > This is expected if you don't turn off write cach
I wrote:
>> try running something that works the file system and simply turn off the
>> system power in the middle of it.
to which [EMAIL PROTECTED] replied:
> This is expected if you don't turn off write caching of the hard
> disks. It breaks the softupdates consistency model because data
> wr
At 01:47 PM 26/01/2005, Nick Pavlica wrote:
All,
With the recent release of 4.11 I thought that I would give it a
Yes, I found the same thing basically. My test box is a P4 3Ghz with 2G
of RAM on a 3ware 8605 controller with 4 drives in RAID5. Virtually every
test I did with iozone* showed a
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 12:42:47PM -0700, Terry R. Friedrichsen wrote:
>
> Thanks for responding to my inquiry. If it fits into your testing program,
> try running something that works the file system and simply turn off the
> system power in the middle of it.
This is expected if you don't turn
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 05:50:02AM -0700, Terry R. Friedrichsen wrote:
>
> Is anybody besides *me* having file system corruption problems with FreeBSD
> 5.3? I've looked around on several of the mailing lists and found no men-
> tion of this.
>
> I have two different platforms on which I'm tryin
That same thought ran thought my mind when I was testing. I started a
process that does heavy writing and literally pulled the plug during
the middle of the operation. I plugged it back in and the box came
back up without a hitch. I did all my testing on x86 boxes using SCSI
and IDE drives. I cu
Thanks for responding to my inquiry. If it fits into your testing program,
try running something that works the file system and simply turn off the
system power in the middle of it.
Twice, now, doing this on my Alpha has rendered the system unrecoverable at
boot time, necessitating a reinstall.
I have been testing 5.3 (Standard Install/Default settings) and
haven't had any file system corruption. However, the I/O performance
results from my testing currently show that there is a major
difference between 4.11 and 5.3 (4.11 is much faster!). I have a
suspicion that these issues may be rel
All,
With the recent release of 4.11 I thought that I would give it a
spin and com pair my results with my previous testing. I was blown
away by the performance difference between 4.11 and 5.3. Iostat
showed a difference of over 30Mb/s difference between the two. In
fact, it kept up or out per
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 05:50:02 -0700 (MST), Terry R. Friedrichsen wrote:
> Is anybody besides *me* having file system corruption problems with FreeBSD
> 5.3? I've looked around on several of the mailing lists and found no men-
> tion of this.
Not the same problem as you, but I've been getting freq
Matthias Buelow wrote:
Petri Helenius wrote:
Are you sure you aren't comparing filesystems with different mount
options? Async comes to mind first.
a) ext3 and xfs are logging filesystems, so the problem with
asynchronous metadata updates possibly corrupting the filesystem on a
crash doesn't ar
Petri Helenius wrote:
Are you sure you aren't comparing filesystems with different mount
options? Async comes to mind first.
a) ext3 and xfs are logging filesystems, so the problem with
asynchronous metadata updates possibly corrupting the filesystem on a
crash doesn't arise.
b) asynchronous met
Quoting Nick Pavlica ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I would like to start addressing some of the feedback that I have
> been given. I started this discussion because I felt that it was
> important to share the information I discovered in my testing. I also
> want to reiterate my earlier statement that
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> jeremy pedersen
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 6:22 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: FreeBSD 5.3 on Compaq ProLiant 1500
>
>
> I have an old Compaq ProLiant 1500 that I would like to
I didn't change any of the default mount options on either OS.
FreeBSD:
# cat /etc/fstab
# DeviceMountpoint FStype Options DumpPass#
/
PH> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:08:52 +0200
PH> From: Petri Helenius
PH> To: Nick Pavlica
PH> Are you sure you aren't comparing filesystems with different mount
PH> options? Async comes to mind first.
He _did_ say "as many default options as possible"... does Linux still
mount async by default?
Are you sure you aren't comparing filesystems with different mount
options? Async comes to mind first.
Pete
Nick Pavlica wrote:
All,
I would like to start addressing some of the feedback that I have
been given. I started this discussion because I felt that it was
important to share the informat
Oliver Fuchs wrote:
Maybe there is a performance problem with FreeBSD - but again that was not
his question.
I don't know why people are so obsessed with performance.. after all,
you can't really load stock Unix systems properly anyways (like, say, an
IBM mainframe, which you can keep at 90+% loa
Chris wrote:
In addition, was on OS running a window manager and the other not? Was
I seriously doubt that raw disk performance of such a test is noticably
affected by the existence of a window manager, or sshd...
mkb.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> Am Montag, 24. Januar 2005 06:17 schrieb Oliver Fuchs:
>
> > > In addition, was on OS running a window manager and the other not? Was
> > > one running ssh and the other not, was FBSD running Linux emu? ... Was
> > > one running (insert program) and th
Am Montag, 24. Januar 2005 06:17 schrieb Oliver Fuchs:
> > In addition, was on OS running a window manager and the other not? Was
> > one running ssh and the other not, was FBSD running Linux emu? ... Was
> > one running (insert program) and the other not...
>
> In addition to this:
> - how often
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005, Chris wrote:
> Oliver Fuchs wrote:
> >On Sat, 22 Jan 2005, Nick Pavlica wrote:
> >
> >
> >>All,
> >> This post is not about BSD VS. Linux and should not be taken that
> >>way. I think that "Flame Wars/Engineer Wars" are waste of time and
> >>energy. I was surprised by my te
Oliver Fuchs wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005, Nick Pavlica wrote:
All,
This post is not about BSD VS. Linux and should not be taken that
way. I think that "Flame Wars/Engineer Wars" are waste of time and
energy. I was surprised by my test results and didn't want to take
FBSD out of the loop just ye
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005, Nick Pavlica wrote:
> All,
> This post is not about BSD VS. Linux and should not be taken that
> way. I think that "Flame Wars/Engineer Wars" are waste of time and
> energy. I was surprised by my test results and didn't want to take
> FBSD out of the loop just yet. There
On Sun, 2005-01-23 at 10:13, Daniel S. Haischt wrote:
> AFAIK - The 2nd CD only contains additional software
> packages ...
>
> faisal gillani schrieb:
> > i installed freebsd 5.3 & the first cd installed
> > everything i needed , but i got 2 cds with freebsd , i
> > browsed it but couldent unders
AFAIK - The 2nd CD only contains additional software
packages ...
faisal gillani schrieb:
i installed freebsd 5.3 & the first cd installed
everything i needed , but i got 2 cds with freebsd , i
browsed it but couldent understand wat is it for
?
=
*º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨¨*¤ Allah-hu-Akber*º¤., ¸¸,.¤º
it was said:
>All,
> This post is not about BSD VS. Linux and should not be taken that
>way. I think that "Flame Wars/Engineer Wars" are waste of time and
>energy. I was surprised by my test results and didn't want to take
>FBSD out of the loop just yet. There may be flaws in my testing that
>
All,
This post is not about BSD VS. Linux and should not be taken that
way. I think that "Flame Wars/Engineer Wars" are waste of time and
energy. I was surprised by my test results and didn't want to take
FBSD out of the loop just yet. There may be flaws in my testing that
have led me to inac
it was said:
>However, after performing a number of I/O and Postgresql tests on
>different equipment, the performance proved to be considerably faster
>when using Fedora. Fedora with XFS was the clear performance winner
>in every test, followed by Fedora with EXT3, then FreeBSD. I was
>surpri
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
