Re: Freebsd 5.0 Named issue stops itself??

2005-03-23 Thread Chuck Swiger
Amandeep wrote: I am running FreeBSD 5.0 and named . The problem is that it named services are crahing every few hrs.. Here are some logs. Any ideas why named is doing that. 5.0? Please upgrade to FreeBSD-5.3 or later, and you will get a newer named with the base system that ought to work bett

Re: FreeBSD 5.0

2003-12-03 Thread jacob rhoden
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, WF Nix wrote: > Will FreeBSD 5.X run on a Pentium 133 with 48 megs of ram? > > I tried 5.0 before it was in -release and it wouldn't even boot...Just > wondering, thanks. It sure does! I run it on a machine for the exact same specs using sendmail/apache/samba/squid and a few

Re: FreeBSD 5.0

2003-12-03 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 12:10:09PM -0500, WF Nix wrote: > Will FreeBSD 5.X run on a Pentium 133 with 48 megs of ram? > > I tried 5.0 before it was in -release and it wouldn't even boot...Just > wondering, thanks. Yes, in general. If you encounter problems with the latest release then please repo

Re: FreeBSD 5.0

2003-12-03 Thread Daan Vreeken [PA4DAN]
On Wednesday 03 December 2003 18:10, WF Nix wrote: > Will FreeBSD 5.X run on a Pentium 133 with 48 megs of ram? > > I tried 5.0 before it was in -release and it wouldn't even boot...Just > wondering, thanks. I have a system here running 5.X with as little as 16MB of ram, so it should work. grtz,

Re: freebsd 5.0 and supporting USB 2.0

2003-08-03 Thread Lowell Gilbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I'm a newbie of freebsd (I used linux for a couple of years),I had just > assembled my new computer (Gigabyte 7VAXP with athlon XP2500+ ), I installed > a 5.0 release and is working fine and I'd like to know if I can set the > kernel to support usb 2.0 or I have to inst

Re: FreeBSD 5.0 install.... getty won't execute

2003-06-19 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Lucas Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just "tried" to upgrade from 4.8 stable to 5.0 release using the > following procedure > > make buildkernel > (error) > make buildworld > make buildkernel (worked this time) > make installkernel (worked after adding a device hint file) > reboot > > kern

Re: FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE and radiusclient-0.3.2

2003-06-08 Thread Lowell Gilbert
"Phil Yuska" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Howdy, > > When trying to execute radlogin I keep getting this error message: > > radlogin[13740]: rc_own_ipaddress: couldn't get own IP address > > I'm stumped, the hostname and ip address both resolve via nslookup and > dig > The radiusclient package

Re: FreeBSD 5.0 /etc/rc.d/ipsec

2003-06-03 Thread William Fletcher
Since I'm replying to my own post, 5.1 fixes the /etc/rc.d/ipsec problem. Thanks to Miguel Mendez for his useful input :-) On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 01:08:05PM +0200, William Fletcher wrote: > Hi, > > After one of my 5.0 machines rebooted moaning about it couldn't find > /etc/ipsec.conf I invest

Re: freebsd 5.0

2003-03-24 Thread taxman
On Monday 24 March 2003 05:27 pm, Pandele Stefan Cristian wrote: >Hello, > I download freebsd 5.0 release and i have installed it. > please tell me waht is the diffrence between STABLE CURRENT & RELEASE. When > i tried to install the driers for my video card (gf2 gts) i had a message > who sou

Re: freebsd 5.0

2003-03-24 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 12:27:54AM +0200, Pandele Stefan Cristian wrote: > >Hello, > I download freebsd 5.0 release and i have installed it. > please tell me waht is the diffrence between STABLE CURRENT & RELEASE. Please read the handbook where this question is answered. > When i tried to

RE: FreeBSD 5.0

2003-03-23 Thread Mike
they don't post the error and I am sure you will get a *nice* reply on how to fix it.. M;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg 'groggy' Lehey Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 7:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: FreeBSD Questions

Re: FreeBSD 5.0

2003-03-23 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Sunday, 23 March 2003 at 19:25:59 -0600, ! wrote: > On Sunday, March 23, 2003 7:42 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> On Sunday, 23 March 2003 at 18:32:41 -0600, <> wrote: >>> Hello, I just purchased the CD set yesterday and I was wondering is >>> there a patch regarding this issue if I install

Re: FreeBSD 5.0

2003-03-23 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Sunday, 23 March 2003 at 18:32:41 -0600, <> wrote: > Hello, I just purchased the CD set yesterday and I was wondering is > there a patch regarding this issue if I install the January 2003 CD. > "The initial freebsd 5.0 cd's and iso images have a flaw in them > related to bootable cd's, with the

Re: FreeBSD 5.0 Xft port broken

2003-03-21 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 12:19, Radhika S wrote: > Hi, > I have been trying to install Pango and Bluefish and i seem > to be coming up against a wall everytime my ports > collection tries to use/usr/ports/x11-fonts/Xft to build > Xft-2.1_3 > I cannot seem to find the package for this and It seems > li

Re: FreeBSD 5.0 and GeForce MX400

2003-03-18 Thread Henrik Hudson
On Tuesday 18 March 2003 18:26, art Miod wrote: > Hi! > I have GeForce MX400 video card... > And I can't run X under FreeBSD 5.0 ... > (I thing that it is problem which driver) > What can I do in thid situaction to have X ??? > Thank you. Are you trying to install the nvidia drivers or using the s

Re: Freebsd 5.0-RELEASE & named pipes

2003-03-10 Thread Borut Kurnik
bash-2.05b.004 here too. But -current might help. Borut On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 04:51, David Syphers wrote: > On Monday 10 March 2003 09:22 pm, Borut Kurnik wrote: > > I worked on 4.7 & still does (also on linux, netbsd, ... :-) ) > > > > This is NetBSD 1.6 > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# echo "te

Re: Freebsd 5.0-RELEASE & named pipes

2003-03-10 Thread David Syphers
On Monday 10 March 2003 09:22 pm, Borut Kurnik wrote: > I worked on 4.7 & still does (also on linux, netbsd, ... :-) ) > > This is NetBSD 1.6 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# echo "test" > f & > [1] 2383 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cat < f > test > [1]+ Doneecho "test" >f > > > And

Re: Freebsd 5.0-RELEASE & named pipes

2003-03-10 Thread taxman
On Monday 10 March 2003 10:22 pm, Borut Kurnik wrote: > Hi! > > The system doesn't wait for me to open the reader, I get the message > instantly. > > I worked on 4.7 & still does (also on linux, netbsd, ... :-) ) Ok then you may want to either use 4.7, or upgrade to -current and see how it does t

Re: Freebsd 5.0-RELEASE & named pipes

2003-03-10 Thread Borut Kurnik
Hi! The system doesn't wait for me to open the reader, I get the message instantly. I worked on 4.7 & still does (also on linux, netbsd, ... :-) ) This is NetBSD 1.6 [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# echo "test" > f & [1] 2383 [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cat < f test [1]+ Doneecho "t

Re: freebsd 5.0 + monitor settings

2003-02-25 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2003-02-25 13:08, Richard morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was wondering is it possible or if i can change the refresh rate > on XF86Config file. I've seen a line in the file that says > vertrefresh 50 - 120 i was wondering if i can just have one value > there and if that would change my re

Re: freebsd 5.0 + monitor settings

2003-02-25 Thread Willie Viljoen
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 21:08, someone, possibly Richard morris, typed: > I was wondering is it possible or if i can change the refresh rate on > XF86Config file. I've seen a line in the file that says vertrefresh 50 - > 120 i was wondering if i can just have one value there and if that would >

Re: freebsd 5.0 + apache + ddclient

2003-02-21 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Friday 21 February 2003 16:11, Bryan Cassidy wrote: > I'm thinking maybe this is the problem. > > use=if, if=ppp0 # via interfaces > > Should it be ppp0 or something else? I'm thinking that is the problem > but not sure. It depends on your internet interface... Min

Re: freebsd 5.0 + apache + ddclient

2003-02-21 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Friday 21 February 2003 13:57, Bryan Cassidy wrote: > The server is running fine but when my ip changes the ddclient script > doesn't update it at dyndns.org so that means when my ip changes i > have to go to dyndns.org and update it myself and thats getting kinda > old ya know? > > To Unsubscri

Re: freebsd 5.0 + apache + ddclient

2003-02-21 Thread Bryan Cassidy
The server is running fine but when my ip changes the ddclient script doesn't update it at dyndns.org so that means when my ip changes i have to go to dyndns.org and update it myself and thats getting kinda old ya know? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-quest

Re: freebsd 5.0 + apache + ddclient

2003-02-21 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Friday 21 February 2003 09:40, Bryan Cassidy wrote: > Hello. Now that I'm able to post to the -freebsd mailing lists I have > a questions. I am using FreeBSD 5.0-R with apache 1.3.27 and ddclient > 3.6.2 installed. Here is my ddclient.conf file > I don't get any errors in the logs or anything. W

Re: FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE and pcm

2003-02-08 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
[ Please do not top-post! ] On 2003-02-07 08:01, Lord Sith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Rod Person <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Yeah, I got tired of having no success with the modules so I >>> tried compiling the sbc and pcm drivers directly into the kernel. >>> >>> Suprise! It now works. >>> >>>

Re: FreeBSD 5.0 installation, boot: fatal trap 12

2003-02-07 Thread Oleksandr Konovalenko
Hi! Thank you very much for this hint with ACPI! In fact, "set hint.acpi.0.disabled=1" did not work, but I figured out to try acpi_load=disable and kernel did not panic! So, seems either problem with an ACPI driver in FreeBSD 5.0 or broken BIOS. --- Lord Sith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Have

Re: FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE and pcm

2003-02-07 Thread Lord Sith
ot;Lord Sith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE and pcm Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 17:49:33 -0500 On Thu, 06 Feb 2003 08:06:46 -0700 "Lord Sith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, I got tired of having no success with the modu

Re: FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE and pcm

2003-02-06 Thread Rod Person
On Thu, 06 Feb 2003 08:06:46 -0700 "Lord Sith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, I got tired of having no success with the modules so I tried compiling > the sbc and pcm drivers directly into the kernel. > > Suprise! It now works. > > So why doesn't it work with the KLMs? well as I understan

Re: FreeBSD 5.0 installation, boot: fatal trap 12

2003-02-06 Thread Oleksandr Konovalenko
> set hint.acpi.0.disabled=1 > boot I tried this, but got same error :-( --- Lord Sith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Have you tried booting without ACPI? > > I've had all sorts of problems with FreeBSD's ACPI. > In fact, I have yet to > install it on a box that it doesn't panic, hang or > bre

Re: FreeBSD 5.0 installation, boot: fatal trap 12

2003-02-06 Thread Lord Sith
Have you tried booting without ACPI? I've had all sorts of problems with FreeBSD's ACPI. In fact, I have yet to install it on a box that it doesn't panic, hang or break something. To do this, interrupt the kernel countdown and then do this: set hint.acpi.0.disabled=1 boot From: Oleksandr Konov

Re: FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE and pcm

2003-02-06 Thread Lord Sith
Yeah, I got tired of having no success with the modules so I tried compiling the sbc and pcm drivers directly into the kernel. Suprise! It now works. So why doesn't it work with the KLMs? From: Rod Person <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Lord Sith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subje

Re: FreeBSD-5.0 xl0 problem

2003-02-02 Thread Doug Reynolds
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 03:21:45 -0500, Roman wrote: >I currently installed FreeBSD-5.0 and having problem configuring xl >card. Dmesg shows that kernel picks it up: > >xl0: <3Com 3c905B-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xe400-0xe47f mem >0xe000-0xe07f irq 11 at device 9.0 on pci0 >xl0: Ethernet a

Re: FreeBSD 5.0 build

2003-02-02 Thread Bruno Clermont
On Sun, Feb 2, 2003, at 07:52 America/Montreal, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: Anything interesting in your /etc/make.conf file? NO_LIBC_R perhaps? On the 5.0 host, there is no /etc/make.conf and /etc/default/make.conf and no variable like those one specified in /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf se

Re: FreeBSD 5.0 build

2003-02-02 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2003-02-02 03:23, Bruno Clermont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I installed a fresh 5.0 system, grab a copy of 5.0 source, tried to > build and it failed. > > I don't know if it's a bug, I might be wrong, but I just want to know > if I'm doing it right, I tried to did it the same way as I used to

Re: FreeBSD 5.0 woes

2003-01-29 Thread Juless Grosse
Thank you all for your answers. Indeed I read the EAG, but didn't think that the performance penalty was so huge. Mabe this should be more emphasized? I'll try 4.7, as per all your suggestions, but the only remaining problem is how to deal with my huge (~100g) ext3 HD. I probably have around 26

Re: FreeBSD 5.0 woes

2003-01-28 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 04:38:10PM -0500, Juless Grosse wrote: > I installed FreeBSD 5.0 this weekend at home and > removed it five hours laters. Two problems made this > use of this OS prohibitive for me, although I was > hoping to stop using Debian and start using FreeBSD. Stick to the 4.x bran

Re: FreeBSD 5.0 woes

2003-01-28 Thread Bill Moran
Juless Grosse wrote: I installed FreeBSD 5.0 this weekend at home and removed it five hours laters. Two problems made this use of this OS prohibitive for me, although I was hoping to stop using Debian and start using FreeBSD. 1) Awful performance on the sound subsystem under heavy load. If I co

Re: FreeBSD 5.0 woes

2003-01-28 Thread Mike Meyer
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Juless Grosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > Can anybody here confirm if these are common problems, > and if there are any settings I might tune for their > removal? I really wish I could change to FreeBSD. The performance issue is easy, and in the early adopter's guide, w

Re: FreeBSD-5.0 xl0 problem

2003-01-28 Thread Alex
Dear/Beste Roman, Monday, January 27, 2003, 9:21:45 AM, you wrote: > I currently installed FreeBSD-5.0 and having problem configuring xl > card. Dmesg shows that kernel picks it up: > xl0: <3Com 3c905B-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xe400-0xe47f mem > 0xe000-0xe07f irq 11 at device 9.0 o

Re: FreeBSD-5.0 xl0 problem

2003-01-27 Thread Matt
> I currently installed FreeBSD-5.0 and having problem configuring xl > card. Dmesg shows that kernel picks it up: *snip* I also use 3com's with the xl driver and I have no such issues: xl0: <3Com 3c905B-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xe400-0xe47f mem 0xea00- 0xea7f irq 12 at device 15.0 o

Re: FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE in VMware

2003-01-26 Thread Greg Lehey
On Saturday, 25 January 2003 at 17:36:39 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 03:44:18PM -0800, nate wrote: >> Michael Ritchie said: >>> Not sure if this should be in -QUESTIONS or a report to VMware themselves, >>> but when attempting to run FreeBSD 5 within VMware Workstation 3.2

Re: FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE in VMware

2003-01-25 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 03:44:18PM -0800, nate wrote: > Michael Ritchie said: > > Not sure if this should be in -QUESTIONS or a report to VMware themselves, > > but when attempting to run FreeBSD 5 within VMware Workstation 3.2 on a > > Windows XP Pro host, the CPU usage sits at 100% -- whether the

Re: FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE in VMware

2003-01-25 Thread nate
Michael Ritchie said: > Not sure if this should be in -QUESTIONS or a report to VMware themselves, > but when attempting to run FreeBSD 5 within VMware Workstation 3.2 on a > Windows XP Pro host, the CPU usage sits at 100% -- whether there are any > processes undertaking heavy processing or not. T

Re: FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE in VMware

2003-01-25 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 09:31:51PM +0930, Michael Ritchie wrote: > Not sure if this should be in -QUESTIONS or a report to VMware themselves, > but when attempting to run FreeBSD 5 within VMware Workstation 3.2 on a > Windows XP Pro host, the CPU usage sits at 100% -- whether there are any > proces

Re: FreeBSD 5.0 Release requirements

2003-01-24 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2003-01-24 21:47, Mantas Kriauciunas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well I have some problems with ram, I have only 92 mb of it, and it is > just simple RAM. What are the requirements for the ram? 92 should be ok. > Like what would be the best? I know 1gb should be enough :) but I am > always le

Re: FreeBSD 5.0 Release requirements

2003-01-24 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jan 24), Mantas Kriauciunas said: > Well I have some problems with ram, I have only 92 mb of it, and it > is just simple RAM. What are the requirements for the ram? Like what > would be the best? I know 1gb should be enough :) but I am always > left with 2mb left... and that is

Re: freebsd 5.0 and snapshots

2003-01-23 Thread Axel Gruner
Hi. On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 18:30:07 -0500 Alan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am trying to get snapshots working on FreeBSD 5.0. I looked in the > handbook on the web and the file: > "/usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/README.snapshot" The Readme tells you: "To create a snapshot of your /var filesystem,

Re: FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE & disabling ssh access

2003-01-23 Thread Unix Tools
Hi, Add the line /sbin/nologin to /etc/shells Cheers - Original Message - From: "Mantas Kriauciunas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:09 AM Subject: FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE & disabling ssh access > Heya! > ermmm... I just Installed 5.0-RELEASE

Re: FreeBSD 5.0 - 4.8 question

2002-12-29 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 01:04:07PM +0100, dick hoogendijk wrote: > What will be the next step for me? I'm a bit confused, because I read > something about the new coming FreeBSD-5.0-RELEASE, but later on in 2003 > a new version 4.8 will come out. > > What's the difference between those two version