On Thu 2012-05-03 20:48:17 UTC+0200, Leslie Jensen (les...@eskk.nu) wrote:
> > Short answer: The patch level (-p3) displayed by uname -r after a
> > reboot will not change if freebsd-update has not touched the kernel.
...
> I have read similar answers and was partly aware of this.
>
> But I was
2012-05-03 20:35, andrew clarke skrev:
On Thu 2012-05-03 19:17:05 UTC+0200, Leslie Jensen (les...@eskk.nu) wrote:
After a reboot my system now has the following label
FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p3 #0
How come it downgrades the label from p6 to p3 when upgrading to p7.
This is a FAQ. There's a t
On Thu 2012-05-03 19:17:05 UTC+0200, Leslie Jensen (les...@eskk.nu) wrote:
> After a reboot my system now has the following label
>
> FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p3 #0
>
> How come it downgrades the label from p6 to p3 when upgrading to p7.
This is a FAQ. There's a thread about it here:
http://lists.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:41:50AM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
> On 01/24/11 06:38, Chip Camden wrote:
> >Quoth Chad Perrin on Sunday, 23 January 2011:
> >>On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 06:18:37AM -0500, Jerry wrote:
> >>>On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:31:40 +1000
> >>>Da Rock articulated:
> >>>
> was decided- where
On 01/24/11 06:38, Chip Camden wrote:
Quoth Chad Perrin on Sunday, 23 January 2011:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 06:18:37AM -0500, Jerry wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:31:40 +1000
Da Rock articulated:
Actually the consensus on this list _is_ to hit reply all- some only
get digest
Quoth Chad Perrin on Sunday, 23 January 2011:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 06:18:37AM -0500, Jerry wrote:
> > On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:31:40 +1000
> > Da Rock articulated:
> >
> > > Actually the consensus on this list _is_ to hit reply all- some only
> > > get digest or are not even subscribed, so the
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 06:18:37AM -0500, Jerry wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:31:40 +1000
> Da Rock articulated:
>
> > Actually the consensus on this list _is_ to hit reply all- some only
> > get digest or are not even subscribed, so they won't receive posts
> > only posted to the list. Unfortu
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, Da Rock wrote:
On 01/23/11 07:43, Gary Kline wrote:
something else, probly not related to my web/dns troubles is that for days
i seem to be getting "spammed" with multiple copies of some mail. these dup
mail are ones that i _have_ sub'd to. Just strange that this mail bu
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:31:40 +1000
Da Rock articulated:
> Actually the consensus on this list _is_ to hit reply all- some only
> get digest or are not even subscribed, so they won't receive posts
> only posted to the list. Unfortunately that can mean you can continue
> receiving replies not nece
On 01/23/11 11:37, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 10:25:05AM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
On 01/23/11 07:43, Gary Kline wrote:
something else, probly not related to my web/dns troubles is that for
days i seem to be getting "spammed" with multiple copies of some mail.
these dup ma
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 10:25:05AM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
> On 01/23/11 07:43, Gary Kline wrote:
> >
> >something else, probly not related to my web/dns troubles is that for
> >days i seem to be getting "spammed" with multiple copies of some mail.
> >these dup mail are ones that i _have_ sub'd to.
On 01/23/11 07:43, Gary Kline wrote:
something else, probly not related to my web/dns troubles is that for days i
seem to be getting "spammed" with multiple copies of some mail. these dup
mail are ones that i _have_ sub'd to. Just strange that this mail bug
happened at the same time that my bin
On 2/8/2010 12:30 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 08/02/2010 17:38, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>> My ordinary practice with production FreeBSD machines is to:
>>
>> - Regularly (weekly), update the sources, rebuild and reinstall world
>> and kernels.
>
> This implies you're running one of the -STABLE br
Tim Daneliuk writes:
> 3) If I do an in-place upgrade to 8.x (I'll probably wait until 8.1)
>and immediately follow it with a 'portupgrade -arR', will I be
>guaranteed that every port will be migrated to the very latest
>8.x libs?
You want 'portupgrade -af' instead. [You can add the
On 08/02/2010 17:38, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> My ordinary practice with production FreeBSD machines is to:
>
> - Regularly (weekly), update the sources, rebuild and reinstall world
> and kernels.
This implies you're running one of the -STABLE branches, rather than
-RELEASE: updates to -RELEASE hap
On Friday, 26 September 2003 at 17:58:45 -0700, Frank Jahnke wrote:
>
> Finally, I received a gentle admonishment to follow up to this list. My
> experience with mailing lists (mostly on Usenet over the last 15 years)
> has been that my public inquiries have given rise to a mixture of public
> and
Michael Dexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Having complete control over the build of my network OS is simply
> revolutionary... but I was hoping this revolution would not be so
> bloody.
You can get *that* with one of the supported update options. "make
release" was never intended for anybody
17 matches
Mail list logo
