use systat
Using 'systat -iostat' it shows mostly idle with 25-70 MB/s on the aacd0
array. Most of time above 50. Thanks for the help!
--
Robert
70MB/s can't be "mostly idle". or you meant CPU mostly idle.
changing to RAID-not5 will help. seeking why disk traffic is so high -
will help eve
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:17:09PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >After reading tuning, it suggests the SWAP should be double RAM.
> >According to dmesg...
>
> installing database on RAID-5 or asking if to add swap (when almost none
> is used)? what is more stupid? whould we vote?
That is not
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 22:49 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >> is used)? what is more stupid? whould we vote?
> >
> > That was my whole point of showing you the low usage. I take that as a
> > yes, RAID 1+0 would provide a dramatic difference in speed, thanks!
>
> the only adventage of RAID-5 is l
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 16:34 -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to Robert Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I don't know anything about amavisd's usage of databases. If it's doing
> a lot of small writes, then it's likely that getting off RAID 5 will make
> a marked difference.
I believe this
is used)? what is more stupid? whould we vote?
That was my whole point of showing you the low usage. I take that as a
yes, RAID 1+0 would provide a dramatic difference in speed, thanks!
the only adventage of RAID-5 is less "wasted" space than RAID-1. one and
the only adventage. write performa
In response to Robert Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 22:19 +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
> > Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> >
> > > real memory = 3220635648 (3071 MB)
> > > avail memory = 3150565376 (3004 MB)
> > >
> > > we have 3GB of RAM available with actually 4GB physical
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 22:19 +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> > real memory = 3220635648 (3071 MB)
> > avail memory = 3150565376 (3004 MB)
> >
> > we have 3GB of RAM available with actually 4GB physical RAM installed?
>
> If you're using a 32-bit (i386) kernel you need PA
In response to Robert Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 15:53 -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> > In response to Robert Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > I also have assumed in the past that db performance could be better if I
> > > get off the system RAID-5 and put it on
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 22:17 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > After reading tuning, it suggests the SWAP should be double RAM.
> > According to dmesg...
>
> installing database on RAID-5 or asking if to add swap (when almost none
> is used)? what is more stupid? whould we vote?
That was my whole
After reading tuning, it suggests the SWAP should be double RAM.
According to dmesg...
installing database on RAID-5 or asking if to add swap (when almost none
is used)? what is more stupid? whould we vote?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing l
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
real memory = 3220635648 (3071 MB)
avail memory = 3150565376 (3004 MB)
we have 3GB of RAM available with actually 4GB physical RAM installed?
If you're using a 32-bit (i386) kernel you need PAE. Or switch to 64-bit
(amd64).
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP di
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 15:53 -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to Robert Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I also have assumed in the past that db performance could be better if I
> > get off the system RAID-5 and put it on 1+0? The system has 4 SATA
> > drives.
>
> That will speed thing
In response to Robert Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> We have several postfix transport gateways on different networks all
> working with local amavisd-maia+SA using a remote postgresql backend at
> one location. I am getting delays in the queues on a gateway server at a
> remote site since we
13 matches
Mail list logo
