Re: building the 5.1 kernel

2004-09-01 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
Andrew, Is there any particular reason you're messing around with 5.1 rather than 5.2.1? Donald J. O'Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- On Wednesday 01 September 2004 06:42 am, Andrew wrote: < some stuff I deleted > -- ___ [EMAIL PRO

Re: building the 5.1 kernel

2004-09-01 Thread Adam Smith
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 01:24:11PM +0100, Dick Davies said: > > > > If no changes were made you don't need to recompile your kernel. > > Not true - what if there is a bugfix to an existing driver? Oh, of course :) -- Adam Smith Internode : http://www.internode.on.net Phone : (0

Re: building the 5.1 kernel

2004-09-01 Thread Andrew
Thanks for the reply Reply to your comments... MINIBSD - I am presently running regular ole freebsd 5.1. I eventually plan to rebuild the OS for an application. For now it is vanilla flavor freebsd. GENERIC - Agreed if no changes were made the kernel doesn't have to be rebuilt. I used the uncha

Re: building the 5.1 kernel

2004-09-01 Thread Dick Davies
* Adam Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [0959 12:59]: > On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 07:42:46AM -0400, Andrew said: > > I am trying to rebuild the 5.1 kernel. Using the Freebsd handbook as a > > guide. > > > > I am running freebsd 5.1 and as fyi have been building suse and redhat > > kernels for a while wi

Re: building the 5.1 kernel

2004-09-01 Thread Adam Smith
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 07:42:46AM -0400, Andrew said: > I am trying to rebuild the 5.1 kernel. Using the Freebsd handbook as a > guide. > > I am running freebsd 5.1 and as fyi have been building suse and redhat > kernels for a while without problems. But this is my first time > building the f