On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 11:47 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> I'm wondering why you would
> prefere atacontrol?
I think everyone's been looking for an "official" solution.
--
Bruce Cran
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd
El día Tuesday, March 01, 2011 a las 09:15:01AM +, Bruce Cran escribió:
> On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 09:21 +0100, David Demelier wrote:
>
> > But I can still hear the noise every 10 seconds, I think atacontrol does
> > not totally close the APM feature of the device.
>
> atacontrol's spindown se
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 09:21 +0100, David Demelier wrote:
> But I can still hear the noise every 10 seconds, I think atacontrol does
> not totally close the APM feature of the device.
atacontrol's spindown setting doesn't change anything in the disk
itself: it just controls a timer in the ad(4) d
On 29/4/09 14:18, Alexander Popov wrote:
> Hi, Daniel,
>
> This is the output:
>
> Checking setuid files and devices:
>
> Checking for uids of 0:
> root 0
> toor 0
>
> Checking for passwordless accounts:
>
> Checking login.conf permissions:
>
> ***.home kernel log messages:
> +++ /tmp/security.G4Qu
On 4/29/09, Alexander Popov wrote:
>
> All FreeBSD system partitions are on a disk that I never try to spin down.
> It is weird that something in periodic daily tries to read from my data
> disks...
Than disable one by one until problem got fixed(easy to say than
done), if not than it is ata
bug.
All FreeBSD system partitions are on a disk that I never try to spin down. It
is weird that something in periodic daily tries to read from my data disks...
Alexander.
--- On Wed, 4/29/09, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
> From: Paul B. Mahol
> Subject: Re: atacontrol spindown
> To: aopo...@
d, 4/29/09, Daniel C. Dowse wrote:
> From: Daniel C. Dowse
> Subject: Re: atacontrol spindown
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Date: Wednesday, April 29, 2009, 3:07 PM
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
> Alexander Popov wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi, Daniel
lock keeps local time, as opposed to
> # UTC time. See adjkerntz(8) for details.
> 1,310-5 * * * rootadjkerntz -a
>
>
>
> --- On Wed, 4/29/09, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
>
>> From: Paul B. Mahol
>> Subject: Re: atacontrol spindown
>> To: aopo...@yahoo.c
nthly
#
# Adjust the time zone if the CMOS clock keeps local time, as opposed to
# UTC time. See adjkerntz(8) for details.
1,310-5 * * * rootadjkerntz -a
--- On Wed, 4/29/09, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
> From: Paul B. Mahol
> Subject: Re: atacontrol spindown
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
Alexander Popov wrote:
>
> Hi, Daniel,
>
> It must be periodic(8), but I have trouble identifying what exactly could be
> the trigger. If I look at /etc/defaults/periodic.conf, it has
> daily_clean_disks_enable="NO".
> With respect to daily checks, I j
On 4/29/09, Alexander Popov wrote:
>
> Hi, Daniel,
>
> It must be periodic(8), but I have trouble identifying what exactly could be
> the trigger. If I look at /etc/defaults/periodic.conf, it has
> daily_clean_disks_enable="NO".
> With respect to daily checks, I just have the default setup, nothin
any other configuration options that I should look at?
Thanks,
Alexander.
--- On Wed, 4/29/09, Daniel C. Dowse wrote:
> From: Daniel C. Dowse
> Subject: Re: atacontrol spindown
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Date: Wednesday, April 29, 2009, 1:50 PM
> On Wed, 29 Apr
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
Alexander Popov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> With FreeBSD 7.1 I've started using atacontrol spindown for my secondary
> disks (i.e. disks that are accessed very infrequently). Everything seemed to
> work nice until I noticed in my "daily security run output" lis
13 matches
Mail list logo
