Re: a simple question about ports

2003-03-04 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 01:42:31PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote: > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Cliff Sarginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > > On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:39:13PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote: > > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Cliff Sarginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > > > > Why are ports sometimes r

Re: a simple question about ports

2003-03-02 Thread Mike Meyer
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Cliff Sarginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:39:13PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote: > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Cliff Sarginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > > > Why are ports sometimes released, when they are uncompileable ? > > Lots of different reasons

Re: a simple question about ports

2003-03-02 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:39:13PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote: > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Cliff Sarginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > > Why are ports sometimes released, when they are uncompileable ? > > Lots of different reasons, the most likely one being that they > compiled file on the committers

Re: a simple question about ports

2003-03-02 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Mar 02), Cliff Sarginson said: > Why are ports sometimes released, when they are uncompileable ? More details please. -- Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the messa

Re: a simple question about ports

2003-03-02 Thread Mike Meyer
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Cliff Sarginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > Why are ports sometimes released, when they are uncompileable ? Lots of different reasons, the most likely one being that they compiled file on the committers box. http://www.mired.org/consulting.html Independe