{thread snip}
For those following/interested in this conversation, it's been moved to
freebsd-fs:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2013-March/016812.html
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2013-March/016813.html
And the long/more recent analysis I did of the problem state
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:10:20PM -0700, Reed A. Cartwright wrote:
> {snipped stuff about CAM and mps and ZFS deadman}
>
> Jeremy, I have a question about enabling kernel dumps based on my
> current swap config.
>
> I currently have a 1TB drive split into 4 geli encrypted swap
> partitions (Freebs
1. freebsd-fs is the proper list for filesystem-oriented questions of
this sort, especially for ZFS.
Ok, I'm assuming I should subscribe to that list and post there then?
2. The issue you've described is experienced by some, and **not**
experienced by even more/just as many, so please keep
Note that my issue seems to do with an interaction between the CAM
system and the MPS driver in 9.1. Thus it is more than likely
different than what you are experiencing Quartz.
Now that ZFS deadman has been incorporated into stable, I'll probably
give a 9.1 (i.e. 9/stable) another try.
Jeremy,
(Please keep me CC'd as I'm not subscribed to -questions)
Lots to say about this.
1. freebsd-fs is the proper list for filesystem-oriented questions of
this sort, especially for ZFS.
2. The issue you've described is experienced by some, and **not**
experienced by even more/just as many, so plea
Several people, including me, have an issue like this with 9.1. Your
best bet is to try 9.0.
Hmm... interesting. Is there any consensus as to what's going on?
Before anyone jumps to conclusions though, lemme just post the whole
issue so we're on the same page (apologizes if it turns out thi
Several people, including me, have an issue like this with 9.1. Your
best bet is to try 9.0.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Quartz wrote:
> I'm experiencing fatal issues with pools hanging my machine requiring a
> hard-reset. I'm new to freebsd and these mailing lists in particular, is
> this
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:49-0800, Devin Teske wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What's the difference between:
>
> zpool create -m /desired_destination POOL_NAME disk_device
>
> and
>
> zpool create -m none POOL_NAME disk_device
> zfs create -m /desired_destination POOL_NAME/foo
>
> We would prefer the former,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Denis Fortin wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> On a small system using FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE, ZFS is reporting an issue on a
> pool, that I am not certain is really an issue, but I don't know how to
> investgate...
>
> Here is the situation: I have created a ZFS pool on an
>On 8/15/2010 6:17 PM, Elias Chrysocheris wrote:
>> On Monday 16 of August 2010 01:56:10 Depo Catcher wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, I'm building a new file server. Right now I'm on FreeBSD 6.4/UFS2
>>> and going to go to 8.1 with ZFS.
>>>
>>> Right now I have 3 disks, but one of them has data on it. I'd
On 16/08/2010 8:56 AM, Depo Catcher wrote:
Hi, I'm building a new file server. Right now I'm on FreeBSD 6.4/UFS2 and
going to go to 8.1 with ZFS.
Right now I have 3 disks, but one of them has data on it. I'd like to setup
a RaidZ but have a question on how to do this:
Basically, I need to s
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Depo Catcher wrote:
>
> Hi, I'm building a new file server. Right now I'm on FreeBSD 6.4/UFS2 and
> going to go to 8.1 with ZFS.
>
in a few weeks, ZFS v15 will be MFC'd to RELENG_8 this is a much more
mature and stable ZFS
I would suggest that you run RELENG_8 af
On 10-8-2010 16:00, David Rawling wrote:
On 9/08/2010 2:52 AM, krad wrote:
So I ask you to ponder - at four o'clock in the morning, with mail
down, web servers down and all the disks holding your files failing to
mount - which file system or disk structure would you prefer to try to
troubles
On 9/08/2010 2:52 AM, krad wrote:
On 8 August 2010 16:51, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
On 8-8-2010 14:27, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Yes. It works very well.
On amd64 you'll get a pretty reasonable setup out of the box (so to
speak) which will
On 8 August 2010 16:51, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
>
> > On 8-8-2010 14:27, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> >
> >> Yes. It works very well.
> >> On amd64 you'll get a pretty reasonable setup out of the box (so to
> >> speak) which will work fine for
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> On 8-8-2010 14:27, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
>> Yes. It works very well.
>> On amd64 you'll get a pretty reasonable setup out of the box (so to
>> speak) which will work fine for most purposes.
>>
> One other thing comes to mind. I want a v
On 8-8-2010 14:27, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Yes. It works very well.
On amd64 you'll get a pretty reasonable setup out of the box (so to
speak) which will work fine for most purposes.
One other thing comes to mind. I want a very robus, fast rockl solid
*server*
It will be a file- email and webser
On 8-8-2010 14:27, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Yes. It works very well.
On amd64 you'll get a pretty reasonable setup out of the box (so to
speak) which will work fine for most purposes. Of course, if your
system has particularly demanding IO patterns, then you may have to
tweak some loader.conf or s
On Sunday 08 of August 2010 14:43:48 Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> Years back I ran FreeBSD, so I have some experience. The last couple
> of years I ran Solaris, followed by Opensolaris. I am very satisfied.
> However, considering the troubles after Oracle took over I have rebuild
> my server system u
On 8 August 2010 13:27, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 08/08/2010 12:43:48, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> > Years back I ran FreeBSD, so I have some experience. The last couple of
> > years I ran Solaris, followed by Opensolaris. I am very satisfied.
> > However, considering the troubles after Oracle took
On 08/08/2010 12:43:48, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> Years back I ran FreeBSD, so I have some experience. The last couple of
> years I ran Solaris, followed by Opensolaris. I am very satisfied.
> However, considering the troubles after Oracle took over I have rebuild
> my server system under FreeBSD-8
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 08:57 -0700, Amaru Netapshaak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am interested in using something like ZFS for its distributed nature. I run
> a file server
> with samba acting as a PDC. I also run a second server as a BDC. What I would
> like is a method for keeping both servers "share
In the last episode (Apr 10), Wael Nasreddine said:
> This One Time, at Band Camp, Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said, On Thu, Apr
> 10, 2008 at 01:14:02PM -0500:
> > You don't necessarily need ZFS for this; gmirror would work just as
> > well. You can split your 750GB drive into three
> > parti
This One Time, at Band Camp, Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said, On Thu, Apr
10, 2008 at 01:14:02PM -0500:
> You don't necessarily need ZFS for this; gmirror would work just as
> well. You can split your 750GB drive into three
> partitions/slices/whatevers:
> 160GB - mirror this with your physi
In the last episode (Apr 10), Wael Nasreddine said:
> Hello list,
>
> I have 3 external USB hard disks hooked to my server, serving media
> files via NFS, SSHFS and samba to my local network, laptops and
> Playstation 2, the sizes of these hard disks are 160Gb, 500Gb and
> 750Gb, the 160Gb has no
25 matches
Mail list logo
