Re: Vulnerability

2013-09-30 Thread Jason Birch
This was announced on security-advisor...@freebsd.org on September 10th, 2013. The relevant commits, as taken from the announcement, are: Branch/path Revision - - stable/8/

Re: Vulnerability

2013-09-30 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Jerry writes: > Has this been rectified: > If you read the page at that link, you will find the answer. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list

Re: Vulnerability

2013-09-30 Thread staticsafe
On 9/30/2013 10:05, Jerry wrote: Has this been rectified: Yes. http://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-13:13.nullfs.asc http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=255442 -- staticsafe O< ascii ribbon campa

Re: Vulnerability Database,Compile ports under Security Warnings.

2010-05-24 Thread Frank Shute
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 10:29:45PM +0100, Luca Renaud wrote: > > Krb5-1.8.1 is object of a security warning,and I am not able to compile > it.It tells me to update the ports tree > and try again,which I have done several times but the same warning stands. > Is this port not yet security updated wit

Re: Vulnerability check disabled

2004-02-04 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 19:12:57 + Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 01:25:44PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 13:17, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > > On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 19:31:27 +1100 > > > Gautam Gopalakrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >

Re: Vulnerability check disabled

2004-02-04 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 21:26:01 +0200 Ion-Mihai Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [..] > >>> Type: FEATURE > > Title: Do not install ports with security vulnerabilities [..] > Now, maybe this could be clarified a little bit in CHANGES ? > > Like: > __ > > For using the new security feature of

Re: Vulnerability check disabled

2004-02-04 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 13:25:44 -0500 Joe Marcus Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 13:17, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 19:31:27 +1100 > > Gautam Gopalakrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Hope I'm not missing something obvious, bu

Re: Vulnerability check disabled

2004-02-04 Thread Ceri Davies
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 01:25:44PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 13:17, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 19:31:27 +1100 > > Gautam Gopalakrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Hope I'm not missing something obvious, but since today

Re: Vulnerability check disabled

2004-02-04 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 13:17, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 19:31:27 +1100 > Gautam Gopalakrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Hope I'm not missing something obvious, but since today morning, I've > > been getting wierd warnings when running make in the ports: > >

Re: Vulnerability check disabled

2004-02-04 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 19:31:27 +1100 Gautam Gopalakrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > Hope I'm not missing something obvious, but since today morning, I've > been getting wierd warnings when running make in the ports: > > [madras!/usr/ports/www/apache13]# make fetch-recursive > ===> Fe

Re: Vulnerability check disabled

2004-02-04 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 07:31:27PM +1100, Gautam Gopalakrishnan wrote: > Hello, > > Hope I'm not missing something obvious, but since today morning, I've > been getting wierd warnings when running make in the ports: Ports questions should be asked on ports@ Kris pgp0.pgp Description: PGP s

Re: vulnerability in su?

2003-11-09 Thread krs
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 10:49:35PM -0800, Derrick Ryalls wrote: > > > > while recently cvsup'ing my box here at home, i had a weird > > thing happen... > > > > i had already built world, built and installed the kernel, > > installed world (including all > > appropriate reboots), and when i bro

Re: vulnerability in su?

2003-11-09 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 08:23:25PM -0500, kirt wrote: > is this a known issue? i didn't search to hard for a fix or anything since i > quickly > fixed it myself, but i thought that a situation like that could make for some > interesting > (read *bad*) situations. It's certainly possible to c

RE: vulnerability in su?

2003-11-08 Thread Derrick Ryalls
> > while recently cvsup'ing my box here at home, i had a weird > thing happen... > > i had already built world, built and installed the kernel, > installed world (including all > appropriate reboots), and when i brought it back up, but > prior to running mergemaster, i > popped the jumper o

Re: Vulnerability in PHP Clarification?

2002-07-23 Thread Jason Porter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 http://www.php.net Has a security warning posted on their site. It affects 4.2.0 and 4.2.1. An update to 4.2.2 is highly recommended. chris wrote: | Can anyone clarify this a bit? I see that they state that 4.2.0 and 4.2.1 | are vulnerable. | If y