"Dave Raven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I can solve the problem with the BIMAP - I'm just interested in
> finding out why it has to wait to resolve the host name when I'm telnetting
> directly to an ip address and I have no nameservers specified? Surely that
> can't be the way it has to
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 02:31:58PM -0700, Kevin Stevens wrote:
>
> Err -- no. The broadcast address is a function of the netmask.
> Specifically, looking at IPv4 addresses/masks as 32bit integers, the
> broadcast address has all ones where ever the net
PM
To: Dave Raven; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Urgent 4.9 networking problems
Post your ipf rules and ipnat rules and /etc/resolv.conf
resolv.conf should have your isp's dns server names. If not then
post rc.conf also. Give interface name of Nic card connected to
public internet. Has this net
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 02:31:58PM -0700, Kevin Stevens wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Dave Raven wrote:
>
> > # ifconfig fxp1
> > fxp1: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> > inet x.y.186.3 netmask 0xff00 broadcast x.y.186.255
> > inet x.y.186.1 netmask 0x broadcast x.y.186.1
> >
ether now?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Raven
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 5:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Urgent 4.9 networking problems
I have made further progress - thanks for all your steady replies. I
know it
might look
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Dave Raven wrote:
> The original ip 186.3 sets the broadcast - any aliases after that must
> have a /32 broadcast as they are aliases... That's correct isn't it
> (rest of list) ?
I don't believe so - it's the netmask which needs to be /32, which you did
correctly. See:
h
re the problem is
Thanks
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Stevens
Sent: 24 June 2004 11:32 PM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Urgent 4.9 networking problems
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Dave Raven wrote:
> # ifco
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Dave Raven wrote:
> # ifconfig fxp1
> fxp1: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> inet x.y.186.3 netmask 0xff00 broadcast x.y.186.255
> inet x.y.186.1 netmask 0x broadcast x.y.186.1
> inet x.y.186.15 netmask 0x broadcast x.y.186.15
> inet x.
riginal Message-
From: JJB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 June 2004 11:23 PM
To: Dave Raven; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Urgent 4.9 networking problems
Your symptoms are typical of DNS time outs.
Ping ip address does no DNS lookups.
Ping freebsd.org will not work either.
With out a l
Your symptoms are typical of DNS time outs.
Ping ip address does no DNS lookups.
Ping freebsd.org will not work either.
With out a lot more detail about your network environment, the best
I can say is look at how your network resolves DNS lookups.
Some times a ISP will change the ip address of th
result in an immediate negative response from the DNS
server, which should avoid the delay.
>
> Thanks again
> Dave
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gordon Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 24 June 2004 11:09 PM
> To: Dave Raven
> Subject: Re: Urgent 4.9 n
estions on further tests?
Thanks again
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 June 2004 11:09 PM
To: Dave Raven
Subject: Re: Urgent 4.9 networking problems
try ping -nR -c1 x.y.186.254
If you don't get the same "lag" then it is your D
12 matches
Mail list logo
