2009/1/30 Chris Rees :
> 2009/1/29 Jon Radel :
>>
>> Too much sanitation makes it hard to figure out your problem. However,
>> if that amnesiac. is actually amnesiac.com this probably relates to
>> the fact that DNS for amnesiac.com is horribly broken.
>>
>> dig +trace amnesiac.com
>>
>> shoul
2009/1/29 Jon Radel :
>
> Too much sanitation makes it hard to figure out your problem. However,
> if that amnesiac. is actually amnesiac.com this probably relates to
> the fact that DNS for amnesiac.com is horribly broken.
>
> dig +trace amnesiac.com
>
> should start you down the appropriate
2009/1/29 Jon Radel :
>
> Too much sanitation makes it hard to figure out your problem. However,
> if that amnesiac. is actually amnesiac.com this probably relates to
> the fact that DNS for amnesiac.com is horribly broken.
>
> dig +trace amnesiac.com
>
> should start you down the appropriate
Chris Rees said:
> For about four days now, I've had these emails stuck in my mailqueue,
> and I don't understand what the problem is. Sure it says it has a DNS
> failure, but what does it mean?
>
>
> Jan 29 16:03:19 amnesiac sm-mta[38492]: n0RM2Hlj021695: to=<**>,
> ctladdr= (80/80), delay=
Chris Rees wrote:
> For about four days now, I've had these emails stuck in my mailqueue,
> and I don't understand what the problem is. Sure it says it has a DNS
> failure, but what does it mean?
>
>
> Jan 29 16:03:19 amnesiac sm-mta[38492]: n0RM2Hlj021695: to=<**>,
> ctladdr= (80/80), delay=
