On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 05:24:51PM -0600, John wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 12:00:07AM +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> > John writes:
> >
>
> > J> Once upon a time, like version 7 Unix, login would simply make an
> > J> exec-family call to replace itself with the desired "shell" after
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony
> Atkielski
> Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 5:49 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Running top without a shell -- more questions
>
>
> Joh
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 11:54:00PM +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> Loren M. Lang writes:
>
> LML> Right now I have two login processes running, one for each virtual
> LML> console I am logged in at the moment, though my ssh login shells don't
> LML> have any login processes for them. My guess i
John writes:
J> No, there are HUGE security concerns. The big problem is that
J> many things have shell escapes. Top, as far as I know, does not.
But it's shell escapes that generally create the security concerns, no?
Except for things like buffer overflows, but of course all FreeBSD
software w
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 05:24:51PM -0600, John wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 12:00:07AM +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> > John writes:
> >
> > J> I am not seeing what you are seeing. I see a login process hanging
> > J> around with the regular shells, just like you are describing for top.
>
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 12:00:07AM +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> John writes:
>
> J> I am not seeing what you are seeing. I see a login process hanging
> J> around with the regular shells, just like you are describing for top.
>
> It has occurred to me that all my other logins are ssh, so ma
John writes:
J> I am not seeing what you are seeing. I see a login process hanging
J> around with the regular shells, just like you are describing for top.
It has occurred to me that all my other logins are ssh, so maybe that's
the difference. I don't have telnetd running at all.
J> There's no
Loren M. Lang writes:
LML> Right now I have two login processes running, one for each virtual
LML> console I am logged in at the moment, though my ssh login shells don't
LML> have any login processes for them. My guess is that there staying
LML> around for some cleanup work to do at logout. I th
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 12:53:43PM +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> I've set up a user account that has top for its shell (instead of one of
> the standard shells). As expected, when I log into this account, I
> immediately find myself in top, and if I stop top, I'm instantly logged
> out. That'
Loren M. Lang wrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 12:53:43PM +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
I've set up a user account that has top for its shell (instead of one of
the standard shells). As expected, when I log into this account, I
immediately find myself in top, and if I stop top, I'm instantly logge
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 12:53:43PM +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> I've set up a user account that has top for its shell (instead of one of
> the standard shells). As expected, when I log into this account, I
> immediately find myself in top, and if I stop top, I'm instantly logged
> out. That'
11 matches
Mail list logo
