On Thursday, March 27, 2003, at 07:50 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
Is that easier than "nslookup 1.2.3.4"?
Oops! I forgot that nslookup has a command line more. I usually use
it when I want an interactive mode. :)
Unfortunately, most of it was wrong :-(
To be fair, the question was lacki
AIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: Reverse DNS and single IP address space
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 11:20:34AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> > > zone "0.168.192.in-addr.arpa" {
> > > type
On Thursday, 27 March 2003 at 17:10:13 -0800, Victor Bondarenko wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 11:20:34AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>> zone "0.168.192.in-addr.arpa" {
>>> type slave;
>>> file "s/0.168.192.in-addr.arpa.bak";
>>> masters {
>>> 192.168.1.1;
>>> }
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 11:20:34AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> > zone "0.168.192.in-addr.arpa" {
> > type slave;
> > file "s/0.168.192.in-addr.arpa.bak";
> > masters {
> > 192.168.1.1;
> > };
> > };
>
> This is a slave entry. It would be more interesting to see
On Thursday, 27 March 2003 at 11:31:54 -0700, James Earl wrote:
> I'm in the process of setting up primary and secondary name servers.
> This is my first time setting up named so I'm kinda a newbie in this
> area.
>
> My question is in regards to in-addr.arpa entries in named.conf and
> zone files.
Thanks for the help everyone! From your suggestions, it appears
reverse DNS is setup properly. Now if only my ISP could provide as
good of support, as all of you provided me! :)
James
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm
Thanks for the help everyone! From your suggestions, it appears
reverse DNS is setup properly. Now if only my ISP could provide as
good of support, as all of you provided me! :)
James
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, James Earl wrote:
> On 2003.03.27 11:38 Victor Bondarenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 11:31:54AM -0700, James Earl wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Or, do I even need to worry about reverse DNS entries since my ISP
> > > already has them setup?
> >
> > If your ISP has reverse DNS
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 11:52:04AM -0700, James Earl wrote:
[...]
> I'm assuming if I can use nslookup [ip-address] to get my hostname,
> that reverse DNS on the ISP is setup properly. Is this an okay
> assumption?
Most likely, yes. Just to be safe, I would do something like
nslookup [ip-addr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
~
On 27-Mar-2003, James Earl wrote message "Re: Reverse DNS and single IP address
space"
~
> I'm assuming if I can use ns
> I'm assuming if I can use nslookup [ip-address] to get my hostname,
> that reverse DNS on the ISP is setup properly. Is this an okay
> assumption?
If you know enough about nslookup, then yes. I'd suggest "host
-v 1.2.3.4", though. Its a bit easier. :)
On 2003.03.27 11:38 Victor Bondarenko wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 11:31:54AM -0700, James Earl wrote:
[...]
> Or, do I even need to worry about reverse DNS entries since my ISP
> already has them setup?
If your ISP has reverse DNS for your IP(s), there's really no point in
you mapping them on yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
~
On 27-Mar-2003, James Earl wrote message "Reverse DNS and single IP address
space"
~
> Or, do I even need to worry about reverse DNS entries
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, James Earl wrote:
> Or, do I even need to worry about reverse DNS entries since my ISP
> already has them setup?
They have probably done the reverse lookup already. IIRC, the
reverse DNS for a single IP address can not be handed off to you by the
ISP without some inte
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 11:31:54AM -0700, James Earl wrote:
[...]
> Or, do I even need to worry about reverse DNS entries since my ISP
> already has them setup?
If your ISP has reverse DNS for your IP(s), there's really no point in
you mapping them on your own. Your network might see whatever yo
15 matches
Mail list logo
